Update 31-Aug 4:10 pm CDT - Jean mentioned in the comments that she has heard different takes on this Bible passage in non-Catholic churches that members of her husband's family attend. So I asked ChatGPT to also write a Southern Baptist sermon on the same passage. I've pasted it below the Catholic homily that begins right after the break.
-----
Last weekend, the second reading at Sunday mass was what might be the single most controversial passage in the Bible: St. Paul's discourse in Ephesians which contains the notorious line, "Wives should be subordinate to their husbands out of reverence for Christ".
I didn't preach last weekend, but I sat in the deacon's chair for two masses. One reader (a man) read the long version of the reading, which includes the phrase in question. From my seat, I have a good view of the congregation, and I observed a couple of husbands nudging their wives or snickering toward them, with the wives striving to put up the appearance of being good sports about it. At the other mass, the reader (a woman) clearly had misgivings about reading that passage from the pulpit. She asked me before mass if she could read the short version, which has cut out the line about wives being subordinate. I told her it was fine with me but she should check with the priest, in case he was planning to address the passage directly in his homily. He told her to please read the short version.
Of course, no homilist is obligated to preach on that passage, even when it is one of the appointed readings. In my experience, most homilists see the path of prudence as avoiding that reading with the proverbial ten-foot pole. This second priest did briefly and cautiously allude to the passage, characterizing it as a call for spouses to love one another. That strikes me as in harmony with what St. Paul wrote, but it takes a bit of reflection and unpacking to get there.
As you know, occasionally I ask the ChatGPT artificial intelligence engine to crank out a homily. One can find the texts and videos of many homilies (from humans) on the Internet, but as a general rule, I don't crib from other homilies when I preach. I do consult sources, but I consider it part of the homilist's job to pray, reflect and struggle with the text him/herself, and produce an original work on it. But in my opinion, ChatGPT did such a good job explaining this passage that I'd happily read it aloud from the pulpit. I'm pasting it below the break, and would welcome your thoughts on it.