Bonus track: a homily I didn't give yesterday: Uniting under Peter

 For the second month in a row, I prepared a homily I didn't give.  In fact, I prepared two I didn't give.  I am going to share one of them here.  

You may recall that last month, I wasn't happy with what I had prepared, so I completely rewrote it, very shortly before I was to give it.  

This month, the circumstances were different: I was scheduled to preach; but I also was scheduled to serve as a deacon with a visiting priest. We get quite a few visiting priests on weekends these days, as our large-ish parish (2,800 registered families) only has one priest and we have five masses scheduled every weekend.  At least in our parish, and I think at other parishes, it is considered the courteous thing to do to give the visiting priest the option of preaching at masses for which he's scheduled.  Our rota of visiting priests is fairly stable so I know most of them, and so on deacon preaching weekends, it's not uncommon for me to work out with the visiting priest ahead of time which of us will preach. 

But in this case, the visiting priest was new to me and to the parish.  He is an instructor at the seminary, which suggested (to me, anyway) that he is sharp and might have some interesting things to share with our congregation.  So I quickly deferred to him.

Here is the one I came prepared to give:

It's time to say who I am

I gave this brief homily yesterday.  That day's readings, the 21st Sunday in Ordinary Time, Cycle A, are here.

This homily was meant to tie into a special occasion: at the mass at which I preached, we baptized a 14 year old young man who had been receiving private instruction.  During the homily, I addressed him ("Jared") directly.  I kept the homily quite brief so the mass+baptism wouldn't run too long.

Too few babies and too many old folk

Recently two subjects come up repeatedly at news sites---the decline in births and the rapidly increasing popuation of elderly and their care needs. They allude also to the "sandwich" generation - middle aged people still working, still raising kids, still seeing to their children's educations and aso caring for their aging parents. The articles about caring for aging parents are heavily focused on the crushing experience of caring for parents with advanced dementia/Alzheimers. The Catholic church has spent millions fighting legal abortion for more than 50 years, to little effect. Now the church is battling another morally challenging issue--assisted dying. This article asks some good questions--what is the Church, not just the institution but THE church—the laity, the parish—going to offer those who see no viable course to escape non-stop pain and suffering other than death?

 https://www.ncronline.org/opinion/guest-voices/beyond-saying-no-church-s-answer-assisted-suicide 

ChatGPT Explains Certain Memory Problems

 There are certain phenomena I see over and over again living here in the Old Folks Home. I asked ChatGPT to help me understand some of them, and I thought the response might be of interest to others. Here's my question and ChatGPT's response. 

My Question

I am curious about the behavior of some of the people in my assisted living facility. There are a number of people whom one would judge, from dealing with them, aren't too far mentally impaired. But when it comes to meals there is a curious phenomenon. For each meal we have two seatings. Breakfast is served at 8 and again at 9, lunch at 12 and again at 1:00, and dinner at 5 and again at six. There is assigned seating and so you eat with the same people at every meal. Now, there are some people who eat dinner at 5, and then they show up for the 6 o'clock seating and are sometimes get very angry when they are told they have already eaten. At other times, they don't seem to be bothered at all. I wonder what goes on in their heads. Do they remember from one day to the next that this happens frequently? Don't they know when they arrive at the second seating that the people they eat with every day are not at the table? Could they be given some kind of note taking device that they could refer to to track for themselves whether they have eaten or not? As far as I can tell, their memories seem to work reliably for other purposes. Is there some reason they can remember many other things, but fail in specific tasks again and again? 

ChatGPT's Response

Yes. What you are describing is quite plausible in people with mild or moderate cognitive impairment, and one of the most striking things about memory disorders is precisely their unevenness. A person can seem perfectly lucid in conversation, remember many facts, recognize everyone around them, and yet repeatedly fail at something as seemingly simple as remembering whether they ate dinner an hour ago.

The key is that "memory" isn't a single mental faculty. Different systems handle different kinds of remembering. Someone may retain old memories, vocabulary, social skills, familiar routines, and recognition of people remarkably well while having much more difficulty forming and retrieving memories of recent events. Eating dinner at 5:00 is an event that has to be encoded as something like, "I ate tonight's dinner about 45 minutes ago." If that memory doesn't get firmly encoded, then at 6:00 there may simply be no accessible memory of having eaten.

Funeral rites in Illinois

 So many priests and bishops live lives that are so different than the lives of lay Catholics that they are often completely tone deaf. Hence the distorted théologies about contraception, marriage, and women.  So they come up with rules surrounding the most important events of people’s lives  that drive people out the doors. They did it with marriage prep, and marriages in the church are at historic lows. .  Now it’s not weddings, but funerals.  Infant/ child baptism rules are also extremely burdensome from based on what I was told  about the requirements for the two grandchildren who are baptized Catholics. More reasons among dozens to allow married priests and ordain women priests. They understand real life better than these cold- hearted celibates. 

https://www.ncronline.org/news/illinois-bishop-bars-family-eulogies-same-day-vigils-under-new-funeral-policies

The sedevacancy

No, I'm not talking about the SSPX. It's about Mitch McConnell's Senate seat.  Wasn't today supposed to be the deadline when a special election could be scheduled to fill McConnell's seat unless they could prove that he would be able to fulfill his duties? So far, crickets.

Kentucky governor Andy Beshear has repeatedly asked for McConnell's staff to confirm his actual condition. Some commenters have said he should just march into McConnell's hospital room and verify  what is going on. Which of course he legally can't do.  Not to mention it is not even known at this point which hospital or rehab facility McConnell is in.

My take is that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats want to change the status quo.  The Republicans, because they might lose a special election, or Thomas Massie might run as an Independent, and win. The Democrats, because with McConnell missing in action, it's one less Republican in the Senate.  In any event someone else will be elected in November, McConnell's status notwithstanding. I haven't heard that the Democrats have a candidate yet. They would be well advised to concentrate on that.

My peeps

I feel solidarity with NPR listeners today.