This is my homily for today, the 3rd Sunday of Easter, Cycle B. The readings for today are here.
Tradition says that St. Luke was a physician. But in today’s Gospel reading of Jesus’s post-resurrection appearance to this room full of his disciples, Luke sounds more like a lawyer than a doctor. He marshals evidence intended to prove something which admittedly can be hard to accept: that this man Jesus of Nazareth rose from the dead.
I assume most of us are here today because we believe. We accept, with a heart of faith, that Jesus’s passion, death and resurrection really happened; and that they constitute Good News for us. When we hear these Gospel stories, they reinforce our faith. They help us to believe.
But not everyone believes. And even in the hearts of us who profess to believe, there can be difficulties and doubts. A part of us remains skeptical, perhaps especially about this seemingly far-fetched claim of Jesus rising from the dead. The skeptical person approaches this, not from a heart of faith, but from a different angle. The skeptic needs to be persuaded.
To be sure, the skeptic may be willing to concede that there once was a man named Jesus of Nazareth; that he made enemies of powerful people; and that these powerful people had him arrested, put on trial, tortured, and then killed. After all, that isn't very hard to believe. There are precedents for such things. That has happened to others before it happened to Jesus. And it has happened afterward.
It continues to happen today: in our own day, authoritarian regimes continue to arrest, torture and kill dissidents and troublemakers. I’ve preached before about the assassination of St. Oscar Romero, the archbishop of San Salvador who was killed by the Salvadoran military regime - shot down while celebrating mass. I’ve preached about Jean Donovan, the lay American woman who, together with three American religious sisters, was kidnapped, raped and murdered by the same brutal Salvadoran regime. There are many other contemporary examples. The name Jamal Khashoggi is pretty well-known, the Saudi journalist who apparently was tortured and killed by a Saudi death squad in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul a few years ago. You may have heard the name Alexei Navalny, the Russian activist and dissident whom Russian agents nearly killed with the terrible nerve agent Novichok last year. Navalny recently was arrested and imprisoned, and the Russian government won’t let his doctors see him. His health is said to be declining - he may well be dying in prison. You may have heard of Jimmy Lai, the Hong Kong media mogul and pro-democracy protest leader. The Chinese government recently sentenced him to prison for his pro-democracy activities, and is considering charging him with other crimes which would ensure that he stays in prison until he dies. Yes, the Roman occupiers of Judea 2,000 years ago crucifying a Jewish troublemaker: that’s not difficult for a skeptic to believe.
It’s the Resurrection which is hard to believe. There is plenty of precedent for authoritarians killing a troublemaker, but one of the troublemakers rising from the dead? That’s hard to believe.
This is where today’s Gospel passage comes in. You see, in order to remain skeptical, the skeptic has to be able to explain away this post-resurrection appearance to an entire roomful of witnesses. If Jesus was dead, then what was he doing, seemingly alive, in this room?
Well, the skeptic might reply, what all these witnesses saw wasn’t really the risen Lord; it was an imposter. Or it was a ghost: a spirit, an apparition of some sort.
And in fact, in Luke’s telling of this story, the latter is exactly what his disciples thought at first: the Gospel account tells us that “they were startled and terrified and thought they were seeing a ghost.” That is not surprising. As we’ve noted: there is no precedent for rising from the dead. People may not immediately understand it, much less accept it.
And so Luke the lawyer goes to work. In support of his case, he has Jesus offering three pieces of evidence to show that it’s really him, and that he literally is in the flesh. First, Jesus shows these witnesses his hands and his feet, which bear the wounds from his being nailed to the cross. That’s pretty good evidence that it’s him and not some imposter. Next, Jesus invites the witnesses to touch him, because a ghost doesn’t have flesh and bones. Then he asks them for something to eat, and proceeds to eat some fish in their presence. Everyone knows that ghosts don’t need to eat anything.
Taken together, this is pretty convincing evidence. We know that Jesus died, because many people witnessed his death on the cross. We know he was laid in the tomb, because the highly respectable Joseph of Arimathea said so. We know the tomb was empty a couple of days later, because that is what some women witnessed. And now we have these reports from an entire roomful of witnesses who not only have seen Jesus alive again, but squeezed his hand and embraced him, and watched him eat.
The only logical conclusion is that this is no imposter, but really is Jesus of Nazareth; and that it’s not just his ghost, but all of him: the enfleshed, embodied man. He died, and yet here he is alive again.
This is the essence of the Good News: Jesus of Nazareth was tortured and murdered by the ruling regime, which isn’t remarkable; and then he rose from the dead, which is remarkable. In fact, it’s unprecedented. A skeptic might be forgiven for doubting it really happened, but according to the evidence we just examined, it would seem to be irrefutable.
In today’s Gospel story, the disciples are still wrapping their heads around all this. Yet they do get the chief point: Jesus who was dead is now alive. And we’re told that they were “incredulous for joy and were amazed”.
There is so much more we could say about Jesus’s rising from the dead: what it means for us and our lives, what it means for our loved ones, what it means for all of humanity, what it says about God and how much he loves all of us. But right now, we’re still in the Easter season. We have the rest of the liturgical year, and the rest of our lives, to unpack what all of this means. For now, let’s just join the disciples in their celebration. Jesus who was dead is alive. The disciples’ incredulous joy and amazement are infectious. Let’s not get vaccinated against this infection: let’s let that joy and amazement infect us, and let it fill our hearts. Let our hearts and our beings overflow with rejoicing: Jesus, arrested and executed by the authoritarians, has risen from the dead. Thanks to St. Luke, attorney for the defense, it’s proven and irrefutable.
Luke's is my favorite gospel for a lot of reasons. The post resurrection accounts are some of them.
ReplyDeleteThere are some who interpret the resurrection as a purely spiritual event, that we don't really need it to be actually physical. And if God had chosen to do things that way, he certainly could have. But the problem would be the lie and the cover-up, the misrepresentation of the bodily resurrection as something that actually happened. It is said that all the disciples except John died as martyrs. Not many people would be willing die for a lie.
Right. "I believe in the resurrection of the body." We recite those credal formulas so often we stop pondering their meaning.
DeleteSince I am the resident skeptic, I suppose it's up to me to comment and ask the obvious (and familiar) questions. The eating of the fish and the demonstration of wounds was supposed to "prove" that it was Jesus in his physical body (the same one that was buried) in the room and not a ghost or spirit body. So how did he get in? The door was firmly locked and bolted and apparently he didn't knock on the door and request to come in. A real human body can't just pass through walls.
ReplyDeleteAlso, why did his closest friends and disciples not recognize him when meeting him before the locked room event? (at the tomb, on the road to Emmaus and even when he initially appeared 'in their midst" in the locked room)
The Transfiguration accounts give us some clues that our glorified bodies are transformed beyond our earthly state. Those accounts also lead me to believe that the people who lived before Jesus didn't have to wait in some kind of holding pattern. Moses and Elijah are spoken of as glorified also, eternity is different than earthly time.
DeleteIn the Emmaus account, I liked the way it is expressed in the King James translation, that the eyes of Jesus' companions on the road were "holden". That they were prevented from recognizing Jesus at first in order for him to make a point. Mary Magdalen at the tomb was also prevented from recognizing him until he said her name.
Hmmm. If Jesus' body was "glorified" then why did his wounds still show? And if his body after rising was as bloodied as it was when buried, why didn't anyone who met him on the road to Emmaus notice that this man needed a doctor!
DeleteGood spin. Those who come up with these kinds of explanations could find good jobs in DC.
Basically these explanations are conceding that it really wasn't Jesus "real" body that the witnesses were seeing.
;)
Or that his real body was really transformed. Right now I could do with a transformed and glorified body that didn't always have something that ached!
DeleteAnne, I think you're asking reasonable questions. And I think Katherine is offering the reasonable answers: that the post-resurrection glorified body is different in important ways than our bodies before death.
DeleteMaybe we won't recognize our spouses right away, either, after the resurrection!
Katherine, it sounds like Jesus’ body didn’t get the full glorification treatment - the nail and spear wounds were still there.
DeleteNot sure that a glorified body is “ real” in the sense that our bodies are real before we die. Sounds like the post-death bodies are spiritual rather than material. Passing through walls isn’t something real human bodies can do, but a spiritual body could do it. And apparently it can change its appearance at will. No cosmetic surgeon needed.
Just guessing that Jesus retained the nail marks and spear wound as ID, to prove it was really him. He used them to convince Thomas, and by extension, people in the future. I always think of that Caravaggio painting, "The Incredulity of Thomas", when that Gospel reading comes up.
DeleteJim, will someone please assure us all that when our glorified bodies are handed out our weight will be ideal, the crooked nose perfectly straight, more importantly, the crippled legs will be healthy, and that all of us will be perfected. Is that why we won’t recognize our spouses? We will all look perfect? No more bad hair days?
ReplyDeleteRight - Jesus kept the marks of his wounds. I guess youthful perfection isn't what we'll end up with?
DeleteAs you noted, Jesus sort of appears out of nowhere, and then nobody recognizes him. Seems the laws of physics don't apply. Maybe that's because after we die, we're pulled out of the constraints of time and space? I'd need a Stephen Hawking to tell me if that's possible with a physical body.
IOW - “ resurrection of the body” doesn’t really refer to normal, human bodies - which are physical. To use the word “body” is thus a bit misleading.
DeleteWhat has interested me about the resurrection narratives is that they contain usually in the same narrative both continuity and discontinuity with the historical Jesus.
ReplyDeleteThe disciples usually do not recognize Jesus immediately. It usually takes them some time. Their initial impression is that he is some other human being, neither an angel nor a ghost. They usually recognize him in some word or gesture that connects this person in front of them with the historical Jesus. Once they do recognize him it is obvious that he is a transformed person, not simply someone that has been resuscitated as in the healing miracles. Yet he still has many things in common with the Jesus they knew.
I think this may give us an idea about our own resurrected lives. We may not immediately recognize the people with whom we have spent a lot of our lives. They may not immediately recognize us.
I remember only a few homilies. One impressive one was by a visiting priest. He called it the miracle of the Good Shepherd. He started by describing a former housekeeper in another state. She initially loved Richard Nixon, but then came to hate him as Watergate unfolded. He had to turn off the TV when Nixon came on. He pointed out that God obviously wanted the conversion of Nixon. Maybe that would come about and so she might have to spend all eternity with Richard Nixon. “Never” she replied. “Look, there are not really a lot of other options” he replied.
Then he said. “Think of that terrible boss! That horrible neighbor! They may end up being saved, and we will have to spend all eternity with them. How is He going to do it? That is what I call the miracle of the Good Shepherd.” He then promptly began the Creed as if to say “I guess we have to take that on faith because I sure don’t see how it is possible.”
So maybe in the resurrected life we will not recognize our terrible boss, and he might not recognize us as his lousy employee. However maybe in encounters with this person we might get some glimpse of the good person that they were at times, just as they might recognize in us some of our gestures or words when we were at our best. Maybe we really never knew each other.
Jack, I think you are right that we will see things that we didn't know about people, including people we didn't like. What is the saying, "To understand all is to forgive all."
DeleteI also think heaven is a big place, "many mansions". We won't have to be in one another's faces constantly. That would kind of be purgatory.
Just an additional thought on resurrection. The perfect metaphor for me is the transformation of the caterpillar to a butterfly. The caterpillar is sealed into a dark place, and virtually nothing remains of its former body, but from that body comes the creature that bursts forth, spreads its beautiful wings, and flies away. I hope I can fly in heaven!
ReplyDelete