Sunday, August 25, 2019

The Affordable Housing Crisis

The New Republic isn't a publication that I read very often, but recently this article, The New American Homeless, appeared on my Facebook feed. It was a sad and uncomfortable look at how families get caught on the downward spiral to homelessness.  The story of this family's journey took place in Atlanta, GA, but it could and does happen in many cities and smaller towns across the nation.

From the article:
"Last August, Cokethia Goodman returned home from work to discover a typed letter from her landlord in the mailbox. She felt a familiar panic as she began to read it. For nearly a year, Goodman and her six children—two of them adopted after being abandoned at birth—had been living in a derelict but functional three-bedroom house in the historically black Peoplestown neighborhood of Atlanta. It was ...at $950 a month, not including utilities—just barely affordable on the $9 hourly wage she earned as a full-time home health aide. 
"...When her lease expired at the end of the month, it would not be renewed. No explanation was legally required, and none was provided. “You think you did everything you’re supposed to do,” she told me, “and then this happens."
Eventually, Goodman came across a listing for a house in Forest Park, which was a 20-minute drive from their current neighborhood. ...A move to this place would further strain her budget. Her rent would increase by $50, and because her clients were in Atlanta, she would spend more on gas as well. At the house, the landlord, an affable 79-year-old man named Abdur-Rahim Dib Dudar, gave her a hurried walk-through. In exchange for the first month’s rent and a $1,000 security deposit, in cash, he agreed to forgo a credit check and any other requirements. Goodman decided that she had no choice but to take the place. "
Though the house was dilapidated, Goodman coaxed her kids into helping her spruce it up. But it was worse than it had initially seemed: The sinks were clogged up, one of the two toilets wouldn’t flush, the floors seemed to be sagging, a shower head was falling out of the wall, and, when Goodman went to plug in a lamp, the socket, she said, “caught on fire.”

In a short time, this house was declared uninhabitable, and Ms. Goodman and her kids sought shelter in a motel for a few days. Long story short, she lost her job. There was no room in available shelters or low income housing, and Goodman and her family found themselves on the streets or couch surfing with reluctant relatives. As of this reading, they still had not found permanent housing.

From the article:
"If the term "working homeless" has not yet entered our national vocabulary, there is reason to expect that it soon will. Hidden within the world of homelessness has always been a subset of individuals, usually single parents, with jobs; what’s different now is the sheer extent of this phenomenon. For a widening swath of the nearly seven million American workers living below the poverty line, a combination of skyrocketing rents, stagnant wages, and a lack of tenant protections has proved all but insurmountable. Theirs, increasingly, is the face of homelessness in the United States: people whose paychecks are no longer enough to keep a roof over their heads."

Lest we think that urban areas are the only places where this could happen, here is a look at how rents have risen in the past several years in smaller towns. I am an occasional volunteer with the local St. Vincent de Paul Society. One of the most frequent requests the organization gets is for assistance with rent. A few years ago the rent amounts were around $500 for a house, somewhat less for an apartment. Seemingly overnight, these amounts have doubled, stressing the resources of the various aid agencies.
We live on a street of 1950s era tract homes. The size of these houses are 800-1000 sq. feet, not counting the basements. Most have 2-3 bedrooms and 1 bathroom. The houses are mostly in decent shape. There was a family living next door for a couple of years. Recently they moved out, saying they couldn't afford the rent increase. The rent is now $1300 a month. The house was rented immediately.  We are lucky, we have owned our place for 24 years and the mortgage payments are less than half of what people are paying for rent now.
Of the Democratic candidates for president, Sanders and Buttigieg have said that housing is one of their priorities. Warren has said that she has a plan (of course). So far she is the only one who does. But realistically much of the solution is going to have to happen on the local level.

44 comments:

  1. At the federal level, housing subsidies are slated for cuts: "Under the proposal, direct rental assistance payments — including Section 8 Housing and housing vouchers for homeless veterans — would be cut by at least $300 million, to $19.3 billion. Additionally, housing for the elderly — known as the Section 202 program — would be cut by $42 million, nearly 10 percent. Section 811 housing for people with disabilities would be cut by $29 million, nearly 20 percent. Money available for Native American housing block grants would fall by $150 million, more than 20 percent." https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-administration-considers-6-billion-cut-to-hud-budget/2017/03/08/1757e8e8-03ab-11e7-b1e9-a05d3c21f7cf_story.html

    At a time when the elderly population and number of veterans is growing this seems like a bad time to be cutting subsidies for those in straits.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And Trump appointed Ben Carson as head of HUD. He might be a neurosurgeon, but he knows zip about the department he's supposed to run. Except he thinks that people can bootstrap themselves out of poverty, they just need enough gumption.

      Delete
    2. That Section 8 housing subsidy funding that Jean mentioned is funded by Congress, so Trump can't unilaterally slash it. It's still worth calling out the malice he shows toward anyone who is poor.

      Even at current funding levels, there is a multi-year waiting list in this suburban area. I'm skeptical that government programs, even with greatly increased funding, can eliminate the problem of affordable housing in any dramatic way. It may be that the opposite would occur: pouring guaranteed federal money into the housing market could serve to inflate it. College tuition funding would face the same risk (it may be happening already, now that the federal government has basically taken over college loans).

      Delete
    3. I tried to help my elderly uncle get into low-income apartment housing on Section 8/202, and it was a nightmare. Once you are approved, you have a limited time to find something before they rescind the assistance. When you are dealing with a skow, stubborn old person, the situation is untenable. He ended up marrying the woman who was taking care of him. Another set of problems.

      Jim makes a good point that bags of government money can make things worse by inflating housing prices. The government also can't possibly oversee the quality of all the homes for which subsidies are paid, and there are slumlords who take advantage of that.

      Delete
  2. Around here, the woman who is the subject of the article, as a single mom with six children, would be put at the top of the list for emergency housing assistance, e.g. at Catholic Charities or other aid organizations that provide that assistance. I haven't had time yet to read the article, so I don't know whether she's exhausted those avenues already. There isn't nearly enough of such housing available - those programs tend to rely on landlords willing to make units available.

    Housing is expensive. Small, nickel-and-dime organizations like Katherine's Saint Vincent de Paul or our parish's Outreach ministry (which used to be a St. Vincent de Paul) can't afford to pay for a client's housing expenses, month after month after month. Like Katherine's group, we can occasionally swing a one-time emergency shot of money, to pay a full month's rent or at least part of a month. We also have to take the approach that, if the client has no hope of paying the following month's rent (because of insufficient or no income), we won't assist for the current month - it's just flushing good money down the toilet to delay the inevitable. I know that sounds harsh, but the money will be spent to keep someone else in a home, or to keep someone else's lights turned on or water running. We don't have enough to pay for everyone that wants help.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jim, yes, our local SVDP can only do one-time rent assistance. And if it's not going to even help them stay in the house, we try and encourage them to find something less expensive. If there is something less expensive. If they're on disability, that opens up some options. Of course it's nigh to impossible to jump all the hoops to qualify for disability.
      One of the best options if they have a steady job and meet other qualifications is Habitat for Humanity. But that won't solve the problem of an immediate eviction. Because HfH either builds basic houses, or renovates an existing house. The client is required to put in a certain amount of sweat equity. Locally there were a bunch of houses that had to be moved from a site where there is a railroad overpass going in. Several of these became Habitat projects in a new location. One hears some griping about how people are being "given" houses. Which isn't true; the clients have low interest mortgages that they have to pay back. But the total cost is kept low by volunteer labor and donated materials.

      Delete
  3. We have The Lord's Place, which provides temporary housing for people like Ms. Goodman. That takes off the time pressure in finding a new place. Of course, it is not a permanent solution. It used to be the Island's (Palm Beach) second or third favorite charity, and it still has the head of a powerful law firm behind it.

    But notice that Ms. Goodman was employed, at a generous $9 an hour, in one of the country's fastest-growing industries, home health care. That is an hourly wage obviously calculated to attract the best possible care for your loved one. Obviously.

    As for finding a place to live on $9, we have cops and school teachers enduring long commutes to find affordable housing on their paychecks, which (no thanks to recent Legislatures) somewhat exceed $9 an hour. Our community association has worked long and hard to get some "workforce housing" built in this county. In fact, the County Commission established by law that developers must include housing affordable to cops and teachers in their new developments or pay into a kitty for others to build it. Of course, when every new development sells homes "from the high $300s" to "from the mid-$400s," nobody is putting in rentals or starter homes, and everybody is paying into the kitty. Which has grown to an interesting size. Now, as to were it might be spent to build workforce housing, the developers of those $399,000 homes say, "Nowhere near my development."

    Incidentally, the median house price in this county is way more than the median income can afford, under the old rules-of-thumb on bank lending. The ratio is about back to where it was at the start of the Great Recession. But not to worry; banks are issuing 30-year mortgages on property they know will be under water in 30 years. The rationale seems to be that the mortgagees will either sell or refinance before the water reaches them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On our way to our favorite walking place, the lake north of town, we have noticed that there are lots of mini-mansions, recently constructed and still under construction, on little acreages. We wondered where all these people work, since most people here work in factories or food processing plants where the pay isn't that great.

      Delete
    2. Tom, about home healthcare jobs, I used to work in that field when our kids were in lower grade school. The hours were flexible, so that I could work the hours when they were in school, and be home when they were home. Which was a positive. But it was gig work, and the pay was lousy. You didn't get paid for your commuting time between clients unless it was out of county (we lived in Colorado at the time). I don't know how anybody could support a family doing that unless your spouse was the primary breadwinner.

      Delete
    3. Tom - you're definitely putting your finger on a big part of the problem. I've concluded that building contractors basically have zero interest in building affordable housing. I still cling, if not religiously, at least tenaciously, to free market theory, and that theory says that, when there is an unfilled need in the marketplace, someone will come forward to fill it. So why doesn't that happen in the case of affordable housing? I'm usually not much for conspiracy theories, but I do suspect the answer has something to do with the collaboration between developers and local government. As Tom notes, nobody is in favor of having "affordable housing" (i.e. poor people) living in their local communities. For local governments, it's a political loser; for developers, it's not nearly as profitable as McMansions. That's my conspiracy theory for today.

      Delete
    4. Right now, I'm paying $20/hr at 16hr/wk for quality home care for my mother. Luckily, I can afford this. Not going through an agency maximizes reward/work. I'm really glad that when I wanted to buy a Nissan 280Z, I bought a Chevy Nova instead. Old Stan thanks Young Stan. Also, if I won the lottery, I'd pay her $100/hr. There is great positive value in this work.

      Delete
    5. My son is friends with a guy who works full-time being a handyman for older people and those who aren't handy. He charges $25 an hour and has a full schedule.

      Delete
  4. It is possible to provide affordable housing to the poor and still maintain a profit. These structures will persist for hundreds of years, are tornado proof, low maintenance. They are even fit for the coming climate catastrophe. The flimsy houses we build in this country need expensive maintenance. Even the Habitat houses have a limited shelf life and will not stand up to what is coming.

    https://www.monolithic.org/rentals

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stanley, that's interesting. They kind of remind me of Flintstone houses, or hobbit ones. I think they make more sense than the so called little houses that you see all over the media. Those always turn out to be either glorified campers, or yuppie playhouses. In the northwest, I think it may be Seattle, they have "villages" of little houses out of shipping containers. Basically those are campers. They don't have plumbing or electricity. So, I guess they are shelter from the elements, but still don't solve the problem of homelessness.
      BTW, have you seen the stories in news about stone houses in the Outer Hebrides from 5000 years ago that they have excavated? They definitely were built to last. They look cozy and even had some built-ins.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, but they are excavating, measuring and photographing those houses on a crash basis because the rising ocean is threatening the one place in the world I would still like to see.

      Delete
    3. Stone lasts . It's not flammable. Termites break their mandibles on it. If they're not inundated, those Outer Hebrides homes could probably be put up for sale.

      Delete
    4. Huh. I thought we were all going to be living in shipping containers.

      Delete
  5. just be happy that you don't live in/around San Francisco and are a renter: https://www.rentcafe.com/average-rent-market-trends/us/ca/san-francisco/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yikes, how does anyone afford that? I'm guessing there are a lot of commuters, if thete are any cheaper areas nearby.

      Delete
    2. How far away is Hayward? Or has it gone Frisco?

      Delete
    3. Hayward is 8 miles east of San Francisco and about the same distance south of Oakland. The entire SF Bay Area is expensive as hell, but not quite as bad as SF. I live in a small town completely surrounded by Oakland and the local rents mirror those in SF.

      Katherine: a problem for SF is that that police officers, fire fighters, nurses, teachers, etc. simply cannot afford to live there if they are renters and have to endure quite long commutes (up to 2 hours each way). Here is a link to some articles on how California school districts are thinking of addressing the problems: https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=yYNlXcP7O4vUsAWMlbzgCQ&q=subsidized+housing+for+teachers+in+california&oq=subsidized+housing+for+teachers&gs_l=psy-ab.1.1.0l2j0i22i30l3.2716.10205..13758...2.0..0.268.4581.0j31j2......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i131j0i70i249.9503K1PoaA8

      Delete
    4. It looks from the links that some of the school districts are thinking of owning homes or apartments for teachers to live in. Interestingly, that is how some districts with an opposite problem have gone. Some small towns which haven't much in the way of perks to attract teachers have built houses for the teachers to live in as part of their benefits. The shop and construction classes built the homes as part of their class (under supervision). So, two birds with one stone.

      Delete
  6. Here's an interesting concept, homes from recycled plastic. Would kill two birds with one stone; the housing shortage, and waste plastic.
    The first example is a conventional-appearing home that would fit in any neighborhood. However these homes are lower cost alternatives which have been built in Columbia. Seems like there could be more research into this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Popular Mechanics, in its September 1951 issues, ran a pretty-well-known (at least by comedians) article entitled, "Your Next Home Will Be Built of Molasses". If you go to this link and click on p.110 you can see it.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=49gDAAAAMBAJ&q=molasses#v=snippet&q=molasses&f=false

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting item from Popular Mechanics from the year I was born. The link has the word "false" on the end. So maybe some people didn't think the article was serious?

      Delete
  8. Change of subject, meant especially for Jim and Katherine. One of the editors of the WaPo's Acts of Faith newsletter has asked for suggestions for music for some of their features. Perhaps you should send in your ideas?

    The Washington Post
    Acts of Faith
    Religion headlines that matter.


    By Julie Zauzmer
    Email Julie.Zauzmer@WashPost.com

    I asked you last week about the names we use, for God and for policy, and I received some interesting responses. My favorite was from reader Ron Kaufman: "The one thing I wanted to say about our politicians is that I would like them to stop using the word 'fight.' They are going to 'fight' for this and 'fight' for that.... I did not elect a politician to 'fight.' I elected a politician to 'work' for us. Work is productive. Fighting accomplishes little."

    Most of the responses I received to last week's email were actually about the YouTube link that I included in the note! A lot of you want this newsletter to come with musical accompaniment more often.

    What songs do you recommend? Anything from hymns to pop songs that express faith -- send me ideas for songs that can set the backdrop for this religion newsletter if you'd like.


    I too like the comment by Ron Kaufman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anne, thanks! I confess I haven't any immediate suggestions for Music To Read Newsletters By. Except that I think it needs to be instrumental-only; people who claim to be able to multitask are liars: the human brain can really only focus on one thing at a time, so one can listen to uplifting lyrics, or read a newsletter, but not both simultaneously.

      Delete
    2. If the music is meant to be a backdrop to the newsletter, I agree with Jim that instrumental is probably best. And I'm guessing they would want music which isn't identified with a particular denomination, but is religious in character.
      Here are a few suggestions: Handel's Pastorale from the Messiah. Der Tag Der Ist So Freudenreich by JS Bach. And Bach's Jesu Joy of Man's Desiring is always lovely. Thomas Tallis' If Ye Love Me is a vocal piece, but it is meditative, and I don't think the lyrics would be distracting. Don't know if that helps, just my two bits worth.



      Delete
    3. And here is a more contemporary one that I recently discovered, O God, You Search Me by Bernadette Farrell. It is vocal rather than instrumental, but I found it very moving and touching; maybe others would also.
      And with that, I'd better quit messing around on youtube, that's a tempting time-sink.

      Delete
    4. Jesu Joy of Man's Desiring would have been a good choice some years ago. But lately, on the heels of Pachibel's Canon (or maybe vice versa) it has become cliche. I think it even turned up in a TV commercial a few years ago. I have it on a dulcimer. Why not?

      Delete
    5. Tom, "Jesu Joy" is never out of style, I will always love it! Pachelbel's Canon got popular when it was used for a Kodak commercial, back when Kodak was still a thing. It's pretty, but difficult for an amateur like me to play.

      Delete
  9. "Sheep May Safely Graze", even just the title makes my BP go down.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We had that piece for our wedding. My brother had a friend who was an organist who was willing to play for us for a bottle of Chivas Regal. He did a lovely job. On the other hand, my cousin had the same piece at his wedding, and it was penance to listen to. Some guy who fancied himself an organ builder had constructed a pipe organ out of vacuum cleaner parts and bourdon tubing for their church.

      Delete
    2. I have a funny image in my head for that organ. Kind of a Hoover Calliope.

      Delete
  10. Back to topic: 1A had a program on affordable housing--more duplexes/triplexes, co-housing, higher density housing, gentrification, etc.

    Lots of proposed solutions, but without price controls in highly desirable areas you just get more housing, not necessarily cheaper housing.

    As an oldster, living in a co-housing area--very small homes built around a common park/"back yard" appeals to me. I do NOT want be ghettoized into an area strictly for old people. I want to be able to hold a neighbor baby, pet a neighbor dog, hear kids playing, and tell teenagers they're going to wreck their hearing of they don't dial down their sub-woofer.

    Worth a listen. https://the1a.org/shows/2019-08-28/1a-across-america-yimby-can-density-increase-affordable-housing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One sees a lot of duplexes being constructed here. They are popular with seniors, especially if yard maintenance is included in the rent.
      I wouldn't mind living in a neighborhood like you describe around a common green area. What I don't want, anytime, ever, is to have to share an assisted living or nursing home room with another person (other than my husband). Just brings back memories of college roommate hell. I suppose if I'm too mentally out of it to know the difference it won't matter. But the thought of having to share a room with a stranger is what motivates me to keep our long term care insurance current.

      Delete
    2. My mother-in-law lived for two years listening to a poor soul with dementia crying out incoherencies day and night. There are strict regulations against moving dementia patients, and a bed with a more with-it patient never arose.

      This goes far beyond college roommate hell. It's why suicide is so high among elders.

      Delete
    3. My mother-in-law lived for nearly 4 years in an assisted living apartment. It was small, but she had it to herself, and got along well. At the end declining health issues forced her to move into full nursing care. Her first roommate was a lady who was depressed, and insisted on having the curtains closed at all times. Her next roommate was someone who talked. All. The. Time. It was actually a blessing in disguise when my MIL got a yeast infection and regulations said she had to be in a room by herself. I agree, these things can be way worse than college roommate hell.

      Delete
    4. That's so sad, Katherine. I fear that levels of privacy and care will erode as our population ages. And everyone hates visiting nursing homes, so loneliness for residents is high.

      Before my mom died, we were wrangling about her situation. She wanted me to move in with her on weekdays. I didn't have the stamina to have two part-time homes 50 miles apart. I wanted her to move to an apartment near me so am could visit every day, but she said that she wouldn't survive a move.

      There's a whole other dimension of the housing crisis.

      Delete
    5. I fear loss of privacy worse than I fear loneliness. I notice that hospitals now rarely have people sharing rooms, which is probably good. It would be really hard to rest with strangers and their visitors around, not to mention increased infection risk. I was only half joking about the "college roommate hell". I had some not-great experiences, and our sons had some downright bizarre ones. We ponied up for a single dorm room for our oldest boy's last semester. He said it was the best present he ever got. Sometimes purgatory is other people.

      Delete
    6. I am with you on privacy. Also, private rooms cut down on the spread of flu and other diseases.

      After a C-section, I had a roommate. The woman was up all night talking to relatives on the phone. About 3 a.m., a harridan of a lactation counselor, who was likely a Church Lady somewhere, came in.

      The next day, my roommate's toddlers came to visit, and they tore all over the place, banged the nursing rocker against the wall, and wanted to see The Boy and cough in his face.

      The morphine had worn off by then, so I bundled up the baby and sat down by the nurses station until they found me a private room.

      Delete
    7. When I had my younger son the hospital was full, and the room they gave me was the one with padded walls that was for psych admissions. It was single occupancy, so fine with me. My grandmother came to visit us and was indignant on my behalf that they had put me in the "lockup", as she called it. I thought it was kind of funny.
      My mom told the story of when she had one of my brothers, of having a chain smoking roommate, who was also a maternity patient. I can't believe they used to let people smoke in the hospital in the '50s.

      Delete
    8. Oh, heck yah! Smokers in maternity right through the 70s. Helped you lose that baby weight!

      Delete