Tuesday, February 6, 2024

Why is gay marriage so antithetical to African Culture?


THE SOCIO-CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF POLYGAMY IN AFRICA


Abstract: In contemporary African societies several African institutions which were of great significance have been subjected to Western categories and as such relegated to the background. One of such indigenous institutions that have been considered “sin” or anti-social is the polygamous family system. Using an ethnographic survey, this study, “The Socio-Cultural Significance of Polygamy in Africa” attempts to explore the significance of the polygamous family system in the social and cultural milieu of Africa. The study discovered that polygamy serves as an agent of moral control in that society. It therefore, recommends that Christian denominations should divorce themselves of Eurocentric categories and accept polygamist in their midst since the Bible did not out rightly condemn polygamy.


In Africa, tradition and religion are synonymous; and the cultural values of the people are tied to their belief system.  In this vein therefore, polygamy as an African institution, becomes an acceptable institution. The practice of polygamy in Nigeria is associated with economic and social values. 

In most indigenous African societies, a man believes that having male children enhances his position and prominence in the community, and his name in addition remains immortalized. Thus, if the first wife bears only female children, the tendency will be to contract another marriage for the expressed purpose of raising male children.

However, the rules guiding polygamy are strict and as such it was not regarded as a form of licentiousness or evil. A number of things make people become polygamous. Many people have their reasons for it; some may be circumstantial, others are willful and premeditated. It was not only in the pre-modern days that the issue of male child pushed one to polygamy, 

Mrs. Calista Ofoma (interview 20/12/2017), who got married at 15 and gave birth to nine female children by ‘the time he was 29, married a second wife for her husband, She did this because her husband wanted a male child, There are two things that led to this polygamous marriage: first the woman was tired of bearing children; second, the pressure from her husband’s family was too much. Even today, pressures from outside the family usually lead people to contract a second wife.

Trobisch (1978) report on one Omodo’s motive for taking a second wife as being
different from his reason for taking the third one; for the first one, his wife led him to that. Omodo’s wife was so overburdened, with both domestics and farm work that she wanted a helper. Omodo’s wife was not the only wife that had had such problem. This is common in Africa. The African woman is overburdened with much responsibility, usually, the man clears the bush and pays for hoeing, but the wife has to do the rest of the work: planting, weeding, and conveying the yam tubers to the ban. After these things, it is also her duty to plan for ‘the daily meals; get wood and water, care for the children and prepare food, while the man most of the time, would sit outside his hut enjoying the air or meet with his age group in the village hall, for social life. Therefore, some African men take to polygamy in order to alleviate the first wife’s problem of overworking. In some cases, the idea is suggested by the first wife.

Omodo married the third wife because her husband, Omodo’s brother, had died. This is an entirely different situation. This shows how important it is to find out one’s motive for being polygamous. It is obvious in Africa how a widow is exposed to untold problems and difficulties. A widow is the most pitiful woman in Africa. A widower will find it easier to marry another wife but not so with the widow. The situation seems worse in the church. Many churches do not have provisions for’ the widows ...even those who are widows indeed as the Bible directs (1 Tim.5:3) are overlooked by the church. The church would only be on the lookout to see when she (the widow) will misbehave — either by sexual immorality or by marrying a non-believer of the Christian faith, they will then suspend or excommunicate her.

To Africans, marriage and procreation are regarded as an aid towards the partial recapture or attainment to the lost immortality. In this sense, it follows logically that, the more wives a man has, the more children he is likely to have and the more children he has the stronger his power over mortality, Therefore, marriage in Africa involves more than two individuals.

an African feels that he has been “born again” among his descendants. Consequently, he is remembered after he had died physically and therefore enters his personal immortality, for the Africans, “children are the glory of marriage”, and so the more they are, the more the glory. A marriage in Africa is regarded “incomplete, valueless and unconsummated if it there is no child, especially a male child (Onunwa 1990:21). It is through this institution of marriage that the society seeks to face the challenge of death and preserve its fading image. The children born in the family are an assurance of the continuity of the generation. This, then, is one of the reasons for polygamy in Africa.

For kings and rulers, as in the case of Solomon and Ahab of the Judeo-Christian Bible and most of the African Chiefs, the opportunity of marrying several wives has an important political function. It helps them to form alliances with powerful kinship groups which might try to seize power from those who hold it. Marrying women from different lineages helps the chief to manipulate allies and “practice a large scale policies which the princely families of Europe could not carry out only within the narrow limits of monogamy (Maquet 1975:74). In those days (and even today) kings and chiefs solidify agreements, contracts, and treaties by marrying, sometimes the princess of the other community or the tribe concerned. This alliance stands indissoluble. Politically, a polygamist stands a better chance to influence people in the community because it will be easier to get his in-laws form allegiance with him. Most of the chiefs, village heads and community heads in Africa today are polygamists.

In many parts of Africa a man is not permitted to have sexual intercourse with the wife within the advanced stage of pregnancy and lactating period. The husband abstains from sexual relationship at least from latter pregnancy until the baby begins to walk and is weaned. Under this situation, the man is left either to remain single within this period or revert to concubineage or prostitution. Therefore, polygamy tends to solve the problem of sexual starvation in view of the fact that he can go into his other wives if one is not  disposed.

In case of sickness in the family, a polygamous family stands a better chance, to render help to the one who is sick and other mutual service among themselves. Conversely, co-wives’ rivalry and feud do not allow such assistance. For example, if any member of the household is sick, that is, one of the wives, other members of the family will assist her in cooking and fetching water, especially if her children are still small. Another benefit of this comes when one wife gives birth there are other wives to help and even care for other children of hers until she regains her vitality. If one wife dies, others are available to take care of her children, and in case of barrenness as already mentioned, “Others bear children for the family, so that the torch of life is not extinguished.

My Summary
 
1. African culture has strong differences in sexual roles, and places great value on having children, especially male children. One can see why the religion of the O.T., where polygamy and divorce were tolerated would have a strong appeal to many Africans. The O.T. was formed in a very similar agrarian economy. The writer of this article is essentially arguing that Christianity should go with this and approve of polygamy.  

2. One can see why African cultural values would have great abhorrence for gay males. They are not contributing to having children, especially male children. They are also not supporting women who are having children.  What is their worth to society?  The whole notion of gay marriage is antithetical to their cultural values. Obviously, something from the West.

3. Role of Christianity is more complicated. It's notion of monogamy challenges African culture. However, Christianity does forbid sex outside of marriage including homosexuality. 

The article below argues that Christianity introduced legislation against homosexuality into Africa, especially in the British school systems.  (All male environments like monasteries and male educational systems have great problems with homosexuality).


Christianity in the West has become increasing tolerant of divorce and remarriage along with premarital sex. Essentially, we have come to accept serial polygamy.  Therefore it is not a  great step to accept concurrent polygamy in the African context, especially if one can continue to condemn sex outside of marriages that are aimed at producing children. 

 











12 comments:

  1. Sorry, it sounds like a perfectly miserable place to be a woman.
    You mention some of the not-great aspects of our society, such that it amounts to serial polygamy. Which I suppose is true to a degree. But the ones who are tolerant of premarital sex and divorce and remarriage would be the last ones to be okay with African style polygamy.
    A previous post discussed an African cardinal as a possible candidate for the papacy. I'm just a hard "nope" on that. They've got to do things their way I suppose, but the church struggles enough with women's issues and women's equality. We don't need anyone dragging us back to Old Testament times.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like a miserable place to be a man, too. Unless Africans produce many more females than males, and I don't believe they do, a lot of males will be left out of marriage. I guess the only opportunity left would be sex outside of marriage, with married and unmarried woman. I guess all sexual morality systems have their flaws, but this bronze age stuff is a bit much.

      Delete
  2. Is there such a thing as "African culture"? It's a continent that accommodates many languages, ethnic groups, religious affiliations, etc.

    African Anglican clergy are as diverse as Archbishops Emmanuel Kolini and Desmond Tutu. I presume there is some variation a!ong Catholic clergy in Africa.

    So drawing a hard line on "no African bishops" strikes me kind of ill-informed at best.

    Sorry. I guess I am just out of step with everyone lately. I'll take a break for awhile and see if I can't get Raber into a cheap suit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not like I'm going to be voting in any conclaves anyway! I guess I've got to trust the Holy Spirit to be involved in the process.

      Delete
    2. I doubt the conclave will be calling any of us. But my point is that it's ignorant to generalize too much about a large and diverse continent. Native North Americans get testy about references to "Indian culture," as if there is no difference between Mayans and Inuits.

      Delete
  3. Many years ago I was a consultant to a small consulting company with Saudi Arabia as its main client.Consultant to the consultants. One of their staff was a Somalian. After he learned that I had three sons he told me that if I were African I would be treated as a queen.

    Many years ago also the daughter of English friends lived and worked in Africa. She married one of her African colleagues but told him that as a Christian, she would not tolerate polygamy. Several months later she learned that he had a wife and children in his native village. She went back to England and got an annulment from the Church of England. She has never married - now in her 50s.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A little matter of a pre-existing condition. I wonder if the wife in his village knew that he had acquired an additional wife.

      Delete
  4. I've heard of two cases of American men (white, of European ancestry) who lived double lives: had two houses, two wives (or perhaps a wife and a partner), in one case a second set of kids, with the two lives kept separate. Apparently these men were adept at inventing excuses to "travel on business" so they could move back and forth between the two households. In one case, it all unraveled after a time. In the other, the man's son (a friend of mine) played amateur detective and busted the dad when the latter was with the Other Woman. As told to me, my friend confronted them in a restaurant, walking up and saying, "Hi Dad". The Other Woman simply got up and walked away, a reaction that tells me that she was aware that the dad had a past that involved having a family, but whether she understood the full story - that he was leading a double life - I don't know. My friend informed his siblings, and they agonized over whether to tell their mom (of course, for all they knew, the mom was aware already but never said anything to the kids). In the event, the mom passed away shortly thereafter.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am sure all of us are inclined to respect other cultures and traditions. But - at least in my view - that doesn't mean that we must construct false equivalences. The African views on polygamy, the privileging of bearing sons, and so on, is understandable, but understanding something isn't the same as giving our full approval.

    To be sure: I try to embrace the traditional Christian idea that people in Africa are candidates for Christian evangelization, just as all other humans are. Christianity transforms culture, just as culture influences how Christianity is lived out. I'd hope that, as Christianity's influence is brought to bear on a culture, monogamy would supersede polygamy, and female children would be embraced fully as much as male children.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The problems of evangelization are similar in both North America and Africa. The problem in North America is our misuse of our abundant wealth, i.e. money. In Africa as indicated by the article, it is the wealthy and powerful who are most likely to be involved in polygamy. Essentially wives and children are forms of wealth, i.e. human capital.

    In both situations, bishops, clergy and laity are unlikely to very critical of wealthy Catholic laity.

    In the case of Africa, I suspect little is said that is critical about polygamy or giving precedence to male children, much is probably said about education as the way to elevate the status of wives and women. The church can do a lot through its educational institutions.

    The challenge of synodality is to begin to listen to one another's cultural context. Evidently Pope Francis and the African Cardinal have listened to one another so that they could agree on statements. I think we need to confront the beam of wealth in our eyes before trying to remove the speck of polygamy from African eyes. African Catholics including those who practice polygamy probably see themselves as being far more family oriented than we are.

    Another factor to consider in regard to homosexuality and polygamy, is the African priests are far more likely to heterosexual than homosexual in orientation. That was true of American priests when we had many vocations like Africa does now.

    The rumor has long been that many African priests have a wife and children on the side. Sometime ago there were articles in NCR about the sexual abuse of nuns by African priests. If many priests have a shadow wife (or perhaps more) they may not be in a place to be critical of the wealthy Catholic who married one wife in Church but has several more on the side.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't know if I am understanding yr point, but aren't religious hierarchies always making concessions to wealth and power in whatever forms it takes locally? Southern white Christian leaders kept quiet about Jim Crow laws. Clergy kept quiet about the manufacture of napalm and Agent Orange by the big chemical company in my hometown that was burning up kids in Vietnam and giving US workers cancer. Pope St Gregory told St Augustine not to impose a lot of finicky rules on King Aethelberht of Kent when he was trying to convert him. Gay and trans people will always be in the minority of the general population, and that gives them no leverage in religious communities.

    That's not a slam at what various faiths teach. But faith is administered by fallible people, and it's all too human to take the path of least resistance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "...aren't religious hierarchies always making concessions to wealth and power in whatever forms it takes locally?" Unfortunately that does seem to be true. Money and power are always temptations.

      Delete