Thursday, May 30, 2019

Leave the gun, take the cannoli

 When I decided it was time to read myself into the mind of Vladimir Putin, I started with a book by Garry Kasparov, the great chess champion who had the guts to run against Putin. Kasparov, in turn, began his book by referring me to Mario Puzo's The Godfather. Before you turn to Macchiavelli, he said, if you want to know Putin, read The Godfather.
 I never had, but I immediately did. And I find it has local application as well.
 And so I was not surprised at the following section of an interview Heather Voegell of Pro Publica and Andrea Bernstein of WNYC conducted on the New York radio station with Andrew McCabe. He was the acting FBI chief, after Jim Comey, whom Jeff Sessions rubbed out, I mean "fired," 26 hours before his pension would have kicked in.
   McCabe: You know, it’s a method of operation that I’d seen many times before in my own investigative history working in Russian organized crime. The leader of the crew, the leader of an organized criminal enterprise doesn’t come out and tell someone what to do. They throw it out as an option that they want that other person to select. And so that


way after the fact they can say: “Oh, I was just doing what they asked me to do. I wasn’t forcing them to pay me $100 a week to protect their furniture store. I simply gave him the option to do that, and he selected it for himself.”
So it’s a kind of a subtle, passive-aggressive kind of bullying that comes with an unspoken threat. That’s very effective. I mean, organized criminal enterprises have been doing that for as long as organized crime enterprises have existed. And so that’s what it felt like in the Oval Office that day as I was being kind of progressively backed into the corner to state the words that they wanted to hear me state.
Bernstein: Just to follow up with that, Jim Comey in his book references La Cosa Nostra. He also says the way that the president operated reminded him of the way the mob operated. But what are you guys saying here?
McCabe: It’s impossible to interact with the president and the administration without drawing that comparison. If you’re somebody who comes from an investigative background, somebody like Jim Comey or myself or anybody else who’s had experience with organized crime, the parallels are undeniable. The parallels in the way business is conducted, the way conversations proceed, the way you are asked for personal loyalty rather than loyalty to the oath that you’ve taken, the way that everything is analyzed on this kind of black-and-white paradox: you’re either with us or you’re against us, or either on our team and a part of this effort or you are somebody that we need to destroy. It’s just such an obvious comparison. I’m not trying to undermine Jim Comey or myself, but it is an undeniable parallel between the way this president conducts himself and those around him support him and conduct themselves and the things that we have seen from organized crime groups.
The whole interview is interesting. So is following the sneaky twists and nasty turns of the Donfather with the classic crime novel as background.


14 comments:

  1. Also makes me think of Henry II saying, "Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?" Or, according to another account, "What miserable drones and traitors have I nourished and brought up in my household, who let their lord be treated with such shameful contempt by a low-born cleric? "
    Not comparing McCabe to Thomas a Beckett. But similar ethics on the part of those in charge.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are comparisons to organized crime and fictional characters necessary to making a case against Trump?

    His petulance, lies, pitiable personal vanity that renders his appearance clownish or frightening, utter lack of empathy for human suffering, inability to grasp basic logic, struggles to maintain functional relationships with our long-time allies--or even his own cabinet members, and poor application of simple punctuation and orthography are on display several times a day in Twitter and in public statements.

    And those are just his personal traits, never mind his nutty and dangerous policies, and ignorance/disregard for the privileges, powers, and limits of his office.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The comparison isn't necessary to making the case, but I think it is very helpful to understanding the dynamic. Shinzo Abe understands it. He made the Donfather's visit to Japan an occasion for showing respect by allowing him to set sandled foot on the sumo mat (where only bare feet are permitted) and be the first to meet the new emperor. In return for the respect, Abe expects favors. Because that is how it works in the Mafia.

      Delete
    2. The comparisons to the Mafia remind me of the way abortion critics compare the destruction of fetal life to the Holocaust and abortionists to Dr. Mengele. These comparisons don't persuade the other side, they merely radicalized the already converted.

      Delete
    3. Tom, I'm sure Abe was just concerned about Trump's bone spurs.

      Delete
  3. A family member posted a link on facebook this morning of an article saying how the media hadn't given due credit to Trump's successes. I clicked on the article, turns out his "successes" were along the lines of tax cuts for corporations, deregulation, Supreme Court appointments, and the fact that the economy hasn't tanked. I didn't engage in any discussion (it's pointless), but couldn't help noticing the cognitive dissonance. The person postng is a farmer, and had recently said how the trade situation has hurt his bottom line.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One of the stations they listen to or social media sites they follow must be urging them to write to the lamestream media and complain about the credit the Donfather isn't getting for the wonderful things the has done. Our local paper is averaging one a day. The wonderful things seem to be dubious or non-existent, but apparently whoever is urging the letters isn't telling them which wonders to mention.

      Delete
  4. "The person posting is a farmer, and had recently said how the trade situation has hurt his bottom line."

    Never underestimate Americans's proclivity to vote against their own interests.

    Studies have been done on why the working poor and the working class poor favor rich oligarchs. Apparently, they like the message that they can pull themselves up by their bootstraps while trapped in limited income jobs. And they want to make sure that the ability to amass great wealth, unfettered by giveaway programs and regulations will be secure for when they make their own millions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Except...Trump was never a self made man. He was born with the proverbial silver spoon in his mouth. Never knew a farmer who would turn down a subsidy, either. Of course that doesn't count as welfare.

      Delete
    2. I don't think Trump supporters care about the truth. They seem to care about the myth--a loud and powerful white man who attracts desirable women and makes a lot of money (and flaunts it unapologetically) with business cunning while playing hardball with pantywaist European socialists.

      People see what they want.

      Yes, farmers never see price supports or crop assistance as welfare. My friend Sen. Grassley has been hectored with this issue many times, which makes him sputter and quack with great indignation.

      At the Fiber Festival we attend every August, you can't turn off the guys who got into angora goats on start-up subsidies and then blamed the government when the subsidies ran out for their inability to keep their farms going. Actually, one guy told me that the USSR was their biggest customer. Russians don't grow much wool, and used to import it like crazy for their Soviet military garments. When the Wall fell, those export deals died. Angora goats mostly live on hobby farms now in very small flocks.

      Delete
    3. Your friend Chuck, who has about 30 acres in soybeans, admitted he didn't really need last year's Trumpian bribe to support the trade war, but he took it because "farmers stick together." Gee, make me rich because my peer group is screwed.

      Delete
  5. It seems a pretty apt comparison - the Trump family to a crime family. And some of them may find themselves in jail after 2024 or even four years earlier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rich capitalists screwing employees and swindling the public is its own form of legal organized crime. I doubt the Trumps are even in the same class as the Sacklers or the Waltons. The problem with the Trumps is that they are dysfunctional and don't want to stay out of the public eye.

      Delete
    2. Jean, I agree that today's financial masters of the universe are in a whole different class than Trump. Trump operates in an old-school way: his method is based on personal charm, intimidation, lawsuits, chiseling, lying, etc. It's all very personal. Today's MotU don't game other people, they try to game entire markets and systems. And, occasionally, sovereign nations.

      Delete