I couldn't have provided much of an answer to that question until yesterday, when, making a too-occasional jaunt through my parish email inbox, I ran across this note from Bishop Richard Pates of the Des Moines diocese. Truth to tell, I had never previously heard of him, but I like what he's saying and doing here. I paste the letter below, followed by the declaration which the email urges me to sign on behalf of my organization. I'm not authorized to do that unilaterally for the parish, but I think the statement is pretty good, and I urge all of us to take a look at it, and talk to our pastors and pastoral leaders about it.
Here is the letter from Bishop Pates:
From: Bishop Richard Pates <richardpates@ocd-info.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 8:04 AM
To: Jim Pauwels
Subject: Support for the Catholic Climate Declaration
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 8:04 AM
To: Jim Pauwels
Subject: Support for the Catholic Climate Declaration
Catholic Climate Covenant
Dear Deacon James Pauwels:I write to seek your support for the U.S. Catholic Climate Declaration, a distinct Catholic expression of the We Are Still In (WASI) campaign. Archbishop Broglio, Bishop Dewane, and I sent a similar appeal to our fellow bishops in the United States, and we now invite you to sign the Declaration.
Why this effort?
The WASI campaign is an effort to demonstrate America’s commitment to address climate change after President Trump announced on June 1, 2017 his intention to withdraw the United States from the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. On that day, the U.S. bishops added their voice to the many groups expressing disappointment with this decision. A few days later, American civil society launched the We Are Still In campaign to show the world that America’s leaders stand by the Paris Agreement and are committed to meeting its goals. To date, over 2,600 institutions—including cities, states, tribes, businesses, investors, universities, non-profits, and places of worship—have joined the campaign, representing the largest cross-section of American society ever to support climate action.
Today, we ask your organization’s endorsement of the Catholic Climate Declaration.
This declaration is a distinct Catholic expression in support of the We Are Still In campaign. The Catholic Climate Declaration expresses the moral imperative to protect and promote human life and human dignity, the poorest and most vulnerable peoples, and our common home. It recognizes—as the U.S. bishops said in 2001—that:
At its core, global climate change is not about economic theory or political platforms, nor about partisan advantage or interest group pressures. It is about the future of God's creation and the one human family. It is about protecting both "the human environment" and the natural environment. It is about our human stewardship of God's creation and our responsibility to those who come after us.Catholic Teaching on Climate Change
Beginning with Saint John Paul in 1990, the Catholic Church has accepted the reality of human-forced climate change and expressed concern about the moral consequences of global warming. The Church has repeatedly advocated for an international climate change agreement in response to this existential threat. The Paris Agreement is an international effort adopted by 195 nations and supported by the Vatican and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). It recognizes that climate change represents an urgent and potentially irreversible threat to human societies and the planet and it establishes a framework to limit the increase in global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels.
This effort is being coordinated by Catholic Climate Covenant, a USCCB-supported organization whose mission is to inspire and equip people and institutions in the U.S. to care for creation and for the poor in response to Church teaching on climate change. Commitments to the Catholic Climate Declaration will be made public on the third anniversary of the release of Laudato Sí, June 18, 2018.
If you wish to enroll your Catholic institution, organization, or community, please go to http://www.
We hope you will join us in response to our Catholic faith.
Yours in Christ,
Bishop Richard E. Pates
Diocese of Des Moines
Episcopal Liaison, Catholic Climate Covenant
______________
The following is the U.S. Catholic Climate Declaration, which may be found at the Catholic Climate Covenant website:
As Catholic communities, organizations, and institutions in the United States, we join with state, tribal, and local governments, as well as businesses, financial institutions, and other faith organizations, to declare that we are still in on actions that meet the climate goals outlined in the Paris Agreement.
The Catholic Church has long recognized—and 55 years ago Pope Paul VI eloquently described--the tragic consequences of unchecked human activity (Laudato Si', 4). This reality includes the problem of excess greenhouse gas pollution and the reality of human-forced climate change. In 2001 the U.S Bishops said that “global climate is by its very nature a part of the planetary commons,” and that prudent action must be taken to protect it (U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Global Climate Change: A Plea for Dialogue, Prudence, and the Common Good, 2001). On numerous occasions Pope Benedict XVI and Pope Francis have called for an international climate change agreement.
Climate change is an urgent moral issue because it compromises the future of our common home, threatens human life and human dignity, and adds to the hardships already experienced by the poorest and most vulnerable people both at home and abroad. We teach that governments exist to protect and promote the common good, and that “the climate is a common good, belonging to all and meant for all." (Laudato Si', 23).
"[A]t its core, global climate change is not about economic theory or political platforms, nor about partisan advantage or interest group pressures. It is about the future of God's creation and the one human family. It is about protecting both 'the human environment' and the natural environment. It is about our human stewardship of God's creation and our responsibility to those who come after us" (U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Global Climate Change: A Plea for Dialogue, Prudence, and the Common Good, 2001).
In December 2015, the leaders of 195 nations adopted the Paris Agreement that established a framework for nations to reduce carbon emissions to limit the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels, and to avoid the most dangerous effects of climate change. The Holy See and the U.S. Bishops have repeatedly voiced their support for it.
On June 1, 2017, President Trump announced that the United States would withdraw from the Paris agreement, the only nation to do so. In response, the U.S. bishops declared, “The President's decision not to honor the U.S. commitment to the Paris agreement is deeply troubling” (USCCB Statement on the President's Withdrawal from Paris Agreement, June 1, 2017).
As Catholic communities, organizations, and institutions in the United States, we join with other institutions from across American society to ensure that the United States remains a global leader in reducing emissions. We call for the Administration to join the global community and return to the Paris Agreement.
I, too, missed both the 2001 statement on climate change and the statement on the U.S. withdrawal from the accord. Just goes to show that even the Catholic press is more likely to cover deploring of familiar subjects, like abortion, and ignore anything the editors and writers feel might be "political."
ReplyDeleteI did find it odd, though, that they referenced Laudato Si' when they cited Pope Paul VI, since Laudato Si' itself footnotes Paul's statement to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization.
While we are on the subject of things the U.S. bishops said that you never heard them saying, their amicus brief to the Supreme Court on the "Muslim travel ban" bears a full reading. It can't be often that the justices have St. Matthew and U.S. intelligence agencies quoted at them in the same brief:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-965/41839/20180330170127467_No. 17-965 Amicus Brief ISO Respondents Final.pdf
I was going to post on it, but Paul Moses covered it on the Commonweal site. He, too, singled out the paragraph that tears the bark off the bumper stickers:
"Such blatant religious discrimination is repug-
nant to the Catholic faith, core American values, and
the United States Constitution. It poses a substantial
threat to religious liberty that this Court has never
tolerated before and should not tolerate now. Having
once borne the brunt of severe discriminatory treat-
ment, particularly in the immigration context, the
Catholic Church will not sit silent while others suffer
on account of their religion."
But there is other good stuff, including a brief review of anti-Catholic discrimination, which is a bit of history most of the flag-waving Catholics who want to keep out Muslims probably know nothing about.
Tom - I think you should go ahead and post on that topic anyway. I saw that Moses has written about the topic but haven't gotten to it yet.
ReplyDeleteJim, I think you are right. Looking at how long my 10:12 a.m. "and, by the way" runs, I think it risks hijacking the thread from the juicy subject you raise.
ReplyDeleteAccordingly, I shall effort mightily.
Ooh - and then Jean or someone can blog about turning perfectly good nouns like "effort" into verbs. I blame sports for that particular thing. Also for the verbal tic, seemingly endemic for the disproportionate number of people involved in pro football who hail from central Pennsylvania, of pronouncing "strength" without the "g", so it comes out as "strenth".
DeleteThe origin was "efforting mightily," which lies not in sports but Western Union. It was a telegraphic answer Scripps Howard's ink-stained wretches used when the editors wired demands for copy soonest. (As you will note, it really says nothing.)
ReplyDeleteAnd although I am working at home, I definitely do not office here.
Meanwhile: EPA chief Scott Pruitt has exempted Racine County, Wisconsin from rules issued by his own agency that would have required Foxconn to take pollution control measures. Foxconn is a gigantic computer assembly company. Bringing Foxconn to southern Wisconsin is a feat out of which Gov. Walker and President Trump have wrung as much political advantage as they can.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-smog-pruitt-foxconn-20180501-story.html
Lesson: jobs outrank the environment. Creating and preserving factory jobs is one of Trump's two or three signature issues. There is just no way that he is going to let EPA rules derail Foxconn coming to Wisconsin.
From DCAP (the Dept. of Creative Amateur Policymaking): possibly the US government, and/or the State of Wisconsin, can subsidize the pollution-control investments that Foxconn would need to make in order to comply with the EPA rules. That way, the jobs still come to Wisconsin, Foxconn's owners/investors aren't out any more money, and the people of Wisconsin don't have to breathe dirtier air. Sounds like a win/win/win to me.
One of the guys who comes to my monthly retirees lunch has a masters degree in physics. Still doesn't believe in climate change or doing anything for the environment. He is a Fox-watching Republican. This fantastic power if denial is not limited to anthropogenic global warming. He smoked multiple packs per day until he couldn't breathe. Now he has to carry around an oxygen concentrator. To me, it's the same frightening power of denial applied to the microcosm and the macrocosm. Oh, he's a mass-going Catholic, too, but I doubt the bishops can dislodge him from climate change denial any more than they could have stopped him smoking. But maybe people on the fence have a chance.
ReplyDeleteStanley - yes, it's an interesting phenomenon. I'm aware that I have a certain susceptibility to it myself: trying to live my life as though inconvenient facts don't actually exist because, well, to do so would be inconvenient. I think your example of smokers who smoke as though the health risks aren't real is a great example. Quitting smoking is a huge inconvenience for anyone addicted to smoking.
DeleteMaybe the ultimate ignoring of reality is that we're all going to die. Many of us live as though we're exempt from the law of mortality. Or so it seems to me.
I wonder if this ability to deny reality is a perennial human trait, or if it's become especially pronounced in recent years.
"trying to live my life as though inconvenient facts don't actually exist because, well, to do so would be inconvenient."
DeleteDidn't say that very well: by "to do so", I meant, "to acknowledge reality and face the prospect of making major changes in my life".
Jim, CO2 level just topped 410ppm for over a month
DeleteSmoke, smoke, smoke that cigarette. Smoke, smoke, smoke, until you smoke yourself to death.
Tell St. Peter at the Golden Gate that you just hate to make him wait
But you just gotta have another cigarette.
Consulting Youtube, I find I screwed up the lyrics. Here's the real thing.
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/65_-vNtWLLs