Tom Nuttall, Berlin bureau chief
Watching the founding event for the youth branch of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party last year, I was struck by a repeated refrain from the stage. “Only mass remigration will
protect our women and children,” declared one newly elected board member.
Another speaker called for “remigration on a massive scale”. Every use of this
term earned thunderous applause… “Remigration” was a word once considered beyond
the pale even for the populist nationalists of the AfD. Its journey to something
closer to the mainstream is in large part the work of one man: Martin Sellner, a
37-year-old far-right Austrian activist and the author of “Remigration: A
Proposal”, which briefly hit the bestseller charts in Germany in 2024. Mr
Sellner divides immigrants into three groups he wants subject to remigration, by
which he may mean anything from forced expulsion to encouraging immigrants to
self-deport: illegal immigrants; the legal sort; and finally, naturalised but
“unassimilated” citizens. Over decades, Mr Sellner suggests, remigration can
arrest the “great replacement” of majorities and safeguard Europe’s ethnic
identity. “Three steps forward, two steps back, until these terms have gone from
unthinkably radical...to popular,” he once said. To judge by the increasing
prominence of the term, Mr Sellner has reason to be satisfied with his progress.
Last week a far-right group sparked uproar in Italy’s parliament with a petition
calling for a remigration law.
In 2024 Donald Trump thrilled Mr Sellner’s acolytes by pointedly using the
word himself. But most importantly, Mr Sellner appears to have the ear of many inside the
AfD, a radical party that leads some German opinion polls—and has a shot at
taking power in two eastern states later this year.
It’s a shame the US has so many xenophobic white people. We could take them all here. We don’t really have a culture that can be disturbed or threatened. And a larger population would help us compete with China and India. Moral considerations aside, Europe is 500M packed in a small place. They will have a hard time and especially now that their economies are drooping. I know this is a pipe dream because the US is not a welcoming place, it’s still a white place. And absorbing them would require a plan and we don’t really plan here. As populations move away from the equator due to climate change, they’ll have to go northward or die. Well, their dying might actually be the plan.
ReplyDelete"Remigration" just sounds like a not too subtle euphemism for ethnic cleansing. I hope the idea doesn't gain traction in Europe, but it seems like fascism and related concepts make the rounds like a bad virus every so often.
ReplyDeleteWonder if Pope Leo has said anything about remigration yet.
Is it pronounced as "re-migration"? Or "rem-igration" (rhymes with "emigration")?
ReplyDeleteRegardless of what they call it in Europe, what is discussed in this post is pretty much what Stephen Miller is pulling the Donald Trump marionette strings to implement here.
In the US, I think the popular perception of immigration policy choices is: "admit everyone" (Democrats) vs. "admit no one and deport everyone" (Republicans).
ReplyDeleteOf course, a whole continuum of alternative policy choices exist between those two poles, but none of them are able to find oxygen in today's political environment. Among those alternatives are what the Catholic church would offer as guidance: nations have the right and duty to control and defend their borders; but a preferential option should be given to refugees and asylum-seekers; and we should be generous in welcoming immigrants. This balanced outlook is ill-suited for today's landscape of politics, social media and left/right-wing legacy media.
And yet if we don't find some kind of a balanced policy, we're never going to get out of the present dysfunctional loop. Sen. Ruben Gallegos of Arizona has put forth what he calls a "five pillared plan". I don't know all the particulars, but at least it seems to be a serious effort to engage with the issues.
Delete