Monday, September 13, 2021

Who do we say he is?

Here is a philosophical question for the group: if one writes a homily, but doesn't actually give it, is it still a homily?  I ask that because what follows is a homily I had written for yesterday, the 24th Sunday in Ordinary Time for Cycle B.  I had been away on vacation for more than a week, and consequently was not at the parish the previous weekend, when they posted the preaching schedule for September.  My personal calendar told me I was supposed to preach yesterday.  So I spent a good deal of time last week, while we were vacationing, praying, thinking and discussing with my wife what I would say about yesterday's Gospel.  Then I waltzed into the sacristry yesterday before mass only to be informed that the official schedule for presiders and deacons has the deacons preaching, not this past weekend, but in a couple of weekends.  So I goofed, or the schedule changed, or something.  I was paired yesterday with a visiting priest who, naturally, had come prepared to preach, so I graciously (at least I hope I was gracious about it) deferred to him.

But, in case it is of interest, here is what I would have said.   

Who do you say that I am?

The people of Jesus’s time weren’t entirely sure who Jesus was.  Their guesses - John the Baptist or Elijah - weren’t exactly right, but not completely on the wrong track, either.  Both Elijah and John clearly had been sent by God and were mighty prophets.  I think we need to give the people a decent grade for seeing that Jesus also had been sent by God, and God had given him remarkable gifts.

Peter’s answer was better: he identified Jesus as the Christ, which means the Anointed One.  Another word for that person is Messiah: the one chosen by God, whose coming had been foretold, and who would save us from our enemies.  In calling Jesus the Christ, Peter is saying a lot: he is putting Jesus at the turning point of salvation history.  God has been preparing for the coming of the Christ, his Anointed One, over many generations.  The Christ’s coming among his people means that God has not forgotten us, has not turned away from us: he has sent this man Jesus to rescue us and restore us to God’s friendship.  All of that is wrapped up in Peter’s naming Jesus as the Christ, the Anointed One.  If we give the people a B for guessing John the Baptist or Elijah, then maybe we award Peter a solid A for saying Jesus is the Christ.

Two thousand years later, it’s an urgent question for us, too: Who do *we* say Jesus is?

Of course, Jesus himself tells us who he is, in various Gospel metaphors and parables.  He is the light of the world, come to dispel the darkness of sin and light the way to our salvation.  He is the Good Shepherd, who guards us, and rescues any of us who stray from the herd.  He is the vine who provides life and nourishment to us the branches.  He is our way, our truth, and our life.  All of these are food for thought and prayer for us.

There are other possible answers, too.  Here are three of them:

One answer is: Jesus is our friend – or, even better, our brother.  Just like our best friend, or our siblings, Jesus knows us well: better than anyone.  We share our secret thoughts and our deepest desires and longings with our closest friend, or with the sister or brother with whom we’re the closest.  Our brother or our friend know things about us that even our parents don’t know.  Our brother or our friend know *all* about us: even our warts and our failings.  But the great thing about a brother or a good friend is they overlook the warts and failings.  From time to time, we do things that hurt or disappoint our friend or our brother.  But that’s the wonderful thing about good friends and good siblings: they forgive.  They continue to love us even when we have hurt them.  No matter what, they continue to love us: to the very end.  A good friend or a loving sibling would give his or her right arm to help us.  That’s the remarkable thing about Jesus, our best friend and our closest brother: he gave his very life for us.

Our friend or our brother: is that who we say Jesus is? 

Here’s another answer: Jesus is our teacher – or, to use a term that has been applied to one who taught disciples, Jesus is our master.  Like a good teacher or master, Jesus dispenses wisdom to us – he tells us how to live our lives well.  Good teachers challenge their students: often, the things worth knowing require a lot of work and may even require struggle.  But internalizing knowledge and wisdom of a good teacher and master is worth all the work and struggle.  Some of Jesus’s lessons are hard. He teaches us, not to strike back at our enemies, but to turn the other cheek.  He teaches us, not to walk past those in need, but to give them not only the shirt off our back but our cloak as well.  He teaches us to love everyone, even our enemies.  He teaches us that we shouldn’t strive to be among those who lord it over others, but to serve others instead.  Those aren’t easy lessons to grasp, but our teacher and master asks us to try anyway.

Our teacher or our master: is that who we say Jesus is? 

Here’s a third answer: Jesus is our lord and king.  Like a good lord and king, Jesus protects us from our enemies.  He tells us we have no reason to be afraid because he is watching over us and guarding us.  Like a good lord and king, Jesus makes sure that we, his subjects, have the food we need.  He gives us the bread of life, and living water.  Like a good lord and king, Jesus dispenses justice, especially on behalf of the poor and weak who aren’t connected, who lack the means and the clout to get their day in court.  Jesus makes sure that the rich and powerful aren’t exploiting and trampling over the rights of the little people.

Our lord and king: is that who we say Jesus is? 

Other answers are possible.  Some of us may see Jesus as a priest, or as a healer, or perhaps in some other role.  But who do *you* say that I am?  Who is Jesus, to us? 

Whether we intend to or not, we’re answering Jesus’s question, every moment of every day.  The way we live our lives tells us, tells the world, and tells Jesus himself, who we really think Jesus is.  How we live tells Jesus whether he’s important to us, whether we are grateful for all he has done for us, whether we even respect him very much.  Sadly, it’s very easy to live our lives as though Jesus isn’t actually very important to us at all.  Nothing comes more naturally to us than ignoring Jesus and doing whatever we wish, pursuing whatever goals and pleasures appeal to us.  Do we live as though Jesus is important to us – as though he is at the very center of our lives?  Do we live as though Jesus is our brother, or our friend?  As though Jesus is our teacher and master?  As though Jesus is our lord and king? 

Who do you say that I am?  Who do we say that Jesus is?  We answer that question by how we live our lives.

25 comments:

  1. I think it is a good one, Jim. I especially liked the ending, "Who do we say that Jesus is? We answer that question by how we live our lives."
    Save it for next time this gospel comes up.
    If you're on in two weeks, you'll get a another good one, Mark 9. I love the part that says, "For whoever is not against us is for us. Anyone who gives you a cup of water to drink because you belong to Christ, amen, I say to you, will surely not lose his reward."
    I hope you had a good vacation. Where did you go?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, it was very nice. It was a getaway for my wife and me, as the kids who still are college age are now embarked on their academic year, and the house is a little emptier than it was this summer :-). I have a sister in North Carolina, so we visited with her, and spent some time in the Appalachian area, hiking, visiting historical sites, and similar activities. It turns out that area is a wine producing area, too, so we tried some of the local wines. They were better than some other alleged American wine-producing areas!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll bet the Appalachians are pretty this time of year.

      Delete
    2. It was too early for the fall colors, but the mountains themselves are dramatic and stunning. Although not always fun to drive at high speeds!

      Delete
  3. For me, Jesus is a teacher. Not a brother, not a friend, not a King. I do not know whether or not he is divine. But he embodied and taught wisdom, through his words and through how he lived his life.

    So I think the real issue is what you said at the end - do people who claim to be Christian live as though they are trying to follow Jesus' teachings in the gospels? Unfortunately, I would say that many - perhaps most - who call themselves "christian" in America do not live their lives according to Jesus' teachings - at least not among white evangelicals and white Catholics. Both groups tend to wear their religion on their sleeves, patting themselves on the back as they loudly proclaim 'I am a Christian". They are outwardly pious and dutiful, but then support trumpism, the living antithesis of Gospel values.

    I also don't see this statement as being at all true in the real world -

    "Like a good lord and king,Jesus dispenses justice, especially on behalf of the poor and weak who aren’t connected, who lack the means and the clout to get their day in court. Jesus makes sure that the rich and powerful aren’t exploiting and trampling over the rights of the little people."

    If Jesus is supposed to be doing this, he might not get a good employment review. Jesus taught us what WE should do - but he's not a Fairy Godmother who waves a wand and makes everything right. The little people are trampled on every day, everywhere in the world.

    "Master" teachers might teach all the right things, but that doesn't ensure that those hearing it will internalize what is taught, and live it out in their own lives.

    I think that describing Jesus as "loving friend" or "loving brother - sibling" may also be a mistake. Many have very problematic relationships with siblings and cannot depend on them to have our backs. Very often friends are more to be trusted than family, but we also have to be careful to realize when we are placing unfair burdens on them and not lean on them too often.

    I heartily dislike the images of Lord and King. In the history of the world, Lords and Kings have seldom been good to their people. Jesus certainly recognized this reality.

    I am reminded of the scene in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade when both good guys and bad guys are racing to get to the Holy Grail first. When they all finally locate the site of the Holy Grail at the same time they see a shelf full of cups, some gilded, some plain. The bad guy, advised by the keeper of the Grail to "choose wisely", seizes the most elaborate cup - gold, encrusted with precious jewels, something a King might own. He sips from it and promptly dies. The keeper of the Grail wryly comments - "He chose poorly". The most simple, plain cup was the Grail, a cup that would be in the home of poor people, unlike the gilded cup.

    Christianity lost its way when it become the official religion of the empire. The Catholic church has yet to lose the trappings of empire. It has been the reformers - Francis of Assisi, Benedict (not Ratzinger), etc who kept more closely to the path taught by Jesus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I also don't see this statement as being at all true in the real world -

      ""Like a good lord and king,Jesus dispenses justice, especially on behalf of the poor and weak who aren’t connected, who lack the means and the clout to get their day in court. Jesus makes sure that the rich and powerful aren’t exploiting and trampling over the rights of the little people.""

      Right. It's true in his kingdom. Not always true (in some cases, hardly ever true) in the kingdoms of this world. I think most of us are living lives of "dual citizenship" between the two kingdoms.

      Thinking about the different sorts of justice - retributive justice, distributive justice, social justice - I think we see the same sort of "dual citizenship". It may well be that Black Lives Matter has succeeded in calling our attention to an area of our civic life (law enforcement) in which justice has been anything but blind for people of color. Perhaps BLM will result in actual change for the good. I'm not prepared to insist that God has no hand in that sort of thing.

      Delete
  4. Jim, while you were gone, I addressed some comments to you in the Bearing Witness thread.

    Glad you had a good vacation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Calling Jesus "king", and making him King of Kings makes the entire bunch of royal hot shots kind of relative and devalued, now that they are less than a Jewish technon. That's how it works for me. Of course, the royal bozos put their spin on it.
    Basically, brother and friend are relationship. I think the Trinitarian God is all about relationship. It also "incarnates" God among us, not above us. Maybe I had too many bastardly physics teachers, but that term has less caché with me. I liked Andre Dubus' interpretation of the Good Shepherd. Having taken care of sheep one summer, he learned they were dumb, always running away and getting in trouble. The image turns out to be not complimentary to us "nice little sheep" when interpreted that way.
    Anyway, to answer the big question, Jesus is God among us, God with us, God for us. The closer you are to Jesus, the closer you are to God.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess I’m in trouble. I feel closer to God than to Jesus..

      Delete
    2. Seems like if you're close to God, you've got it covered. I sometimes have trouble relating to the Holy Spirit. The Comforter that Jesus sent at Pentecost is a mystery who is hard to conceptualize.. Though I have read that every time we pray it is because we were called to by the Spirit.

      Delete
    3. Because of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, I feel closer to the Holy Spirit. God seems more distant in space, and Jesus seems more distant in time.

      Congar in his three volume work on the Holy Spirit accuses Catholics of substituting other things for the Holy Spirit, e.g. the Church, the Papacy, the Hierarchy, Mary. The conservative head of the Congregation for the Defense of the Faith famously told Vatican II that the church did not need the Holy Spirit because it had the hierarchy. On the other hand, the Orthodox observers at Vatican II said that instead of a document on the church they would have written a document on the Holy Spirit with an appendix on anthropology.

      Delete
  6. Article in America about Francis' in Slovakia. Francis may bring me back yet, in spite of his patriarchal attitudes about women. Still too loyal to the boys club, but getting there and a whole lot of that problem is related to the church's 2000 year history of patriarchy and misogyny. Not to mention the claims to ontological superiority of the clergy! But.....you've all heard my views on this too many times.

    I liked what he said to Slovakia, especially about refugees.

    I also very much liked what he told the clergy.

    He told his audience: “A church that has no room for the adventure of freedom, even in the spiritual life, risks becoming rigid and self-enclosed…. Some people may be used to this. But many others—especially the younger generations—are not attracted by a faith that leaves them no interior freedom, by a church in which all are supposed to think alike and blindly obey.”

    He urged the bishops, clergy and religious: “Do not be afraid to train people for a mature and free relationship with God. This approach may give the impression that we are diminishing our control, power and authority, yet the church of Christ does not seek to dominate consciences and occupy spaces but rather to be a ‘wellspring’ of hope in people’s lives.”


    How long does it take to read your homilies out loud, Jim?

    He also had this advice:

    Departing from his prepared text, Francis spoke at length about the vital need for pastors to prepare their homilies well and told them to limit homilies to 10 minutes. When he finished speaking on this, they applauded vigorously, but he quipped, “It was the nuns who applauded most because they are the victims of our homilies!”

    https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2021/09/13/pope-francis-slovakia-bratislava-speech-president-priests-bishops-241410

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The title of the America article is "Pope Francis urges priests to limit homilies to ten minutes..." I assume that means all clergy. LOL, I think I need to put the article where certain people will see it.

      Delete
    2. This one in the original post takes about eight minutes. I try to keep mine to no longer than 10 minutes, and even that is too long for the attention span for some people. My experience is: if it's good, it doesn't matter how long it is, people will attend to it. If it's not very good, it doesn't matter how short it is.

      FWIW, we do have a religious sister in our parish who can be pretty vocal about homilies which go on too long :-).

      Delete
    3. "the church of Christ does not seek to dominate consciences and occupy spaces but rather to be a ‘wellspring’ of hope in people’s lives.”"

      I assume his mention of a church which occupies space refers to the church's real estate holdings and physical plant. The church tends to be rather real-estate-centric; the traditional encomium bestowed upon a retiring or recently-deceased pastor is that "he was a builder", referring to having a new church or school, or an expansion, accomplished on his watch.

      I suspect Francis had in mind one of his famous dicta, "time is greater than space."

      I've found myself contemplating more and more another of his dicta, "reality is greater than ideas". Anne, I think this would make sense to an economist: any economic theory must be tested against the reality of actual data. But it's certainly true for those in ministry as well. For example: the reality of young people becoming "unchurched" may serve to dissipate the idea that a parish is doing well. Or the reality of the persons of color in the pews may puncture a (white) parish staff's illusions about what races and cultures a parish actually is serving.

      Delete
    4. The more difficult ones to keep to a short length are the daily Mass ones. Our new pastor wants the deacons to do more of those. The guidelines are 3 to 5 minutes.
      Different denominations have different ideas about what is an acceptable length. For the Evangelicals 45 minutes is not unusual. I have accompanied Protestant relatives to church, and sitting through a 45 minute homily is severe mortification!

      Delete
    5. I'll take more liturgy and less sermon. The protestants don't have as much liturgy so they need a lot of talking to fill up the space.

      Delete
    6. Katherine, when I was working downtown a lot, or going to pick up my son from his school downtown after sports practices I would often stop at the chapel at Holy Trinity church in Georgetown for the 5 pm weekday mass. It was the original church when the university was founded in the 19th century. It's one of my favorite chapels - small, simple, beautiful. If full it might hold about 30 people. Seldom more than 6-8 people at the weekday afternoon mass unless there were families doing college search visits to the campus. I don't like the big church they use on weekends nearly as well. I always like small chapels, few people, no music, more than normal size churches, big crowds, and usually pretty bad choirs.

      Anyway, it's Jesuit too, which means better than average homilies. The homily was never more than 5 minutes max. Always to the point, made you think, and the point didn't get lost in an avalanche of excess words.

      Delete
    7. I assume his mention of a church which occupies space refers to the church's real estate holdings and physical plant.

      He means much more than economic clout, he means social and political clout. I don't think he is particularly concerned about how many people go to Mass, or how many people in a country are Catholic or how influential the hierarchy are on the politics of their country.

      One of his deep criticisms of the clergy is their spiritual worldliness by which he means seeking wealth, honor, and power for the church. He sees that as actually worse than seeking wealth, honor and power for yourself or some secular end.

      Delete
  7. Two thousand years later, it’s an urgent question for us, too: Who do *we* say Jesus is?

    A good question and a good discussion of it.

    I do not think of myself as having a personal relationship to Jesus such as a friend, or brother. I have always had difficulty with Ignatian meditation, i.e. imagining myself in a scene in dialogue with Jesus.

    I imagine the historical Jesus as a teacher and prophet; I don't think of him as a priest or a king. Of course the risen Christ present in the Church is priest and king as well as prophet.

    In the many scholarly searches for the historical Jesus it has been remarked that the person most searchers find looks a lot like the searcher. I guess that is true of myself since I am far more comfortable with being a teacher, even a prophet than being a priest or even worse a king.

    Scholars have remarked that Paul often uses the words Christ and Spirit almost interchangeably, e.g. "in Christ" and "in the Spirit."
    I think that is why I am very comfortable in relating to the Holy Spirit experienced both in myself and in others.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Scholars have remarked that Paul often uses the words Christ and Spirit almost interchangeably, e.g. "in Christ" and "in the Spirit.""

      Glad it's not just me!

      I have a friend whose theory is, Whenever we say much about the Trinity, we're at risk of stumbling into apostacy or worse. So I often attribute whatever subjective, mystical religious experiences I have, to God. Is it the Holy Spirit? Is it the risen Jesus? I am not always sure. I just know that there are times when my heart is filled with so much joy that I feel like it will break and I will explode.

      Delete
  8. I guess I have an emotional connection to Jesus, especially in the Eucharist. That's why it was painful to be without it for 11 weeks in 2020, even though I watched Mass on tv and made spiritual Communion. Once we were allowed to go in person again we went every single day for about two months. The necessary 11 week "fast" was probably good for me, not to take that way of encountering Jesus for granted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In receiving the body of Christ, I am in communion not only with the historic Jesus but also with all other Christians who have or will constitute the mystical body of Christ. The Eucharist (Mass, Divine Liturgy) is the eschatological banquet. The Divine Liturgy begins with “Blessed is the Kingdom…”

      Communion is also food for the journey. This is how the Orthodox understand the Liturgy of the Pre-sanctified, i.e. Vespers, Liturgy of the Word plus communion which they celebrate during weekdays of Lent instead of the Eucharist. I think our Roman history, in which communion was often given outside of Mass, has often transformed the Eucharist into a communion service. I experience the thirty minute weekday Masses as more communion services than Eucharists.

      Delete
    2. Actually the weekday Masses have everything liturgically that the longer, more elaborate Sunday and feast day ones do. They're just more ...basic. Sometimes basic is good.

      Delete
    3. And if a Communion service is what you have, that is what you go with. The priest shortage is so acute in the Grand Island diocese that three parishes up the road from my hometown have a deacon administrator, and all they have are Communion services. They do try and find a priest to say Mass once a month.

      Delete