Saturday, September 5, 2020

Defining Identity

 By now we have all heard of Jessica Krug https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/05/jessica-krug-george-washington-university-cancels-classes-white-black?ocid=uxbndlbing "... a professor who claimed to be Black when in fact she was a white Jewish woman from suburban Kansas City." 

Her story is reminiscent of that of Rachel Dolezal, now known as Nkechi Amare Diallo, which came out a few years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Dolezal.

Of course they are not the first people to assume an alternate identity. But they have committed the additional social mortal sin of cultural appropriation.

I have known women who married into a different ethnic group, and who basically have been absorbed into that group.  For instance, marrying a Hispanic husband, learning Spanish, and learning how to cook like Abuela. But they didn't make up a false story about who they were prior to that.

There have been a couple of instances of people locally who left their spouses and children, assumed another name, and basically vanished off the face of the earth. And the truth came out later, after their death. They may have escaped a troubled past, but also left a wake of abandonment, especially harmful to their children.

I think most of us have fantasized about being someone else, in an alternate universe. Or had times when we wished we had done things differently. But in the end, I never wanted to change any of the big pieces in my life. And the little pieces are usually connected to the big pieces.

Both Jessica Krug and Rachel Dolezal appear to have had some mental health issues, and family problems in the past. The sad part is that both had considerable talents and accomplishments which now seem to be sidelined.  They have burned bridges with both their past and the communities they were advocating for. They wouldn't have had to become minority members to advocate for social justice.

46 comments:

  1. America was traditionally the place where you COULD leave your past behind and reinvent yourself. Hard to do today with all the computer tracking. I actually have fantasized about disappearing and assuming a new identity, leaving the expectations of friends and family behind to see what, if anything, would happen. I could actually do it now, but what's the point at my age.
    Regarding this case, black people passed for white so why not the reverse?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good question. And the PC police are gonna get me for this, but men can turn into women, and vice versa, or choose none of the above, isn't that appropriation too?

      Delete
    2. I agree, Katherine. Things are so fluid, I can't get excited about it. Besides, cultural appropriation is as old as culture. There's a definite Arabic influence in Spanish music. And Arabs are doing rap.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Katherine, there is a whole cultural feud going on between trans women and TERFs (trans-exclusionary radical feminists), who refuse to see trans women as "real" women because they have not experienced female oppression, conditioning, or biology.

      This is the sort of thing The Academy gets jumped up about.

      My guess is that a very small percentage of individuals have some kind of disconnect with their gender. They will have a hard time in life, and I figure it's not not my job to make it worse.

      Likely something similar is going on with Krug and Dolezal.

      Black people who "passed" as white actually had ethnic white heritage; Krug and Dolezal do not. Nella Larsen wrote an excellent novel, "Passing," in the 1920s from the black pov. It is quite eye-opening.

      Delete
    5. Jean, I'm like you, I don't consider that it's my job to make someone else's life worse. But I do lose patience with the restroom wars. Just pick a lane, already.
      Does anyone remember the book, "Black Like Me" by John Griffin? I read it, years ago. I understand that some people now consider that it was appropriation. But I saw it as an expose. Similar to Nellie Bly writing about conditions in mental institutions back on the early 1900s. Both were examples of walking in someone else's shoes for awhile.

      Delete
  2. Some women athletes are not thrilled with trans women being allowed to compete against women who were born female.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "TERFs (trans-exclusionary radical feminists), who refuse to see trans women as "real" women because they have not experienced female oppression, conditioning, or biology."

    Don't we live in interesting (and somewhat silly) times.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Frankly, I get where TERFs are coming from, but, for me, it doesn't translate to not accepting trans women.

      Delete
  4. There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. (Gal 3:28 NIV)

    I take Paul to be saying that ethnic, social status, and gender identity are not important for the Christian. All of these were very much more important in Paul's world than they are in contemporary society.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Seders at Christian churches? Is it to underscore Christ's Judaism by retracting the Last Supper? To understand Christianity as extending God's covenant to all? Does it promote unity and understanding? Or appropriate and twist a celebration of Jewish identity?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do many churches do that anymore? It was kind of a thing back in the 80s. I got the idea that they had sort of moved on from doing Seders; figuring that the way we were doing them wasn't really authentic, and what really is the poibt? Nobody around here wanted to eat lamb or the other stuff. They were subbing beef, and apple salad, and dinner rolls. We keep busy enough doing Holy Week.

      Delete
    2. Some local church, not our parish, seems to advertise it every year. Long ago, our Episcopal priest suggested it as an activity the Sunday school might enjoy, but it was met with distinct lack of enthusiasm.

      Delete
    3. We used to do it. I led it for most of the last 12 years. A rabbi trained our first leader, who trained me. A different rabbi did it another year. There were no offended Jews around here, but when I admitted to my performances on the Commonweal blog that Jewish guy from Canada gave me all kinds of what-for. It took a bunch of active women to put on the Seder, and as they wore out there were no replacements. Besides, there were always complaints about the food. But never about my prayers. Mazel tov!

      Delete
    4. I guess I have to add that I always preceded the Seder by making it clear we were NOT re-enacting the Last Supper in any way, shape or form. That this was about Exodus.

      Delete
    5. LOL, "Jewish guy from Canada". There are some things I don't miss about the old C'Weal forum.
      Yeah, good to make it clear that it wasn't about the Last Supper. That's what the Holy Thursday liturgy is about. Which we didn't get to have this year; not in person anyway.

      Delete
    6. Sort of, kind of related; Jim P, if you are reading this, did you ever experience using "mustum" for Mass? It is basically grape juice with a tiny bit, I think 0.1% of alcohol. Our priest is in recovery and has permission to use it. However the deacons don't have permission. They are using a separate chalice with the regular altar wine. Which actually works out just fine, because no one is drinking after each other, and each purifies has own chalice. Perfect setup for the pamdemic. My husband asked Father what mustum tastes like. He said, "Welch's grape juice."

      Delete
    7. I liked that Jewish guy from Canada. I wish I could remember his name. He used to send me funny things of a non-religious nature by email. I pretty much agreed with him about Christian Seders, but I don't see any point in dredging up debates from long ago.

      Delete
    8. I liked him too, Jean, it seems to me he had a very OT name - never knew if it was his real name or one he used to make his own religious background more obvious to the occasional reader. I think it was Abraham.

      Delete
    9. I think his name was Abe Rosenzweig, which I probably spelled wrong.

      Delete
    10. Good memory! I am terrible at names.

      Delete
    11. "did you ever experience using "mustum" for Mass?"

      No, I don't think so. I do think alcoholism is a problem for priests. FWIW, as the people aren't allowed to drink from the cup these days, I'm also fasting from the cup. I receive all of Jesus from the bread. It just seems a little clerical that the priest and the deacon get to receive from the cup when nobody else does. Of course, the priest has to. Just my private little thing, it doesn't bother me if other deacons continue to receive from the cup.

      Delete
    12. I don't think the deacons here were offered a choice. Of course maybe you have to ask for it.

      Delete
  6. A look back at Jim’s thread on reconciliation - Richard Rohr’s meditation for today is relevant

    https://cac.org/restoring-relationships-2020-09-06/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Anne. I especially liked this quote, "Forgiveness is to let go of our hopes for a different past."

      Delete
    2. Anne, many thanks for that link to Richard Rohr. I really like what he wrote. Rather than share my thoughts here, I'm going to post something new, based on what he has written. (I think you also provided the link in the thread below on reconciliation? Sorry, I started to read it, and then got distracted by something halfway through.)

      Delete
  7. Sorry to come late to this dance. But the topic somehow brought to mind Jose Greco, the Italian-born, Brooklyn-raised "Spanish" dancer, who put Spanish dance on the American map, and Mezz Mezzrow, the Chicago-born clarinet player who, in his wonderful (even if not entirely true) autobiography, said he wanted to be Black the first time he heard New Orleans jazz and did all he could to fulfill his wish.

    Both of those guys were criticized, by some, in their day and since as "inauthentic." But both made significant contributions to their art forms.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To me, these examples are way different than, for instance, someone putting on blackface for a costume party and doing a "steppinfetchit" routine.
      I guess the fundamental thread running through all of the "appropriations" we've been talking about is dishonesty about who they really are. Their authentic self is a victim of the identity they assume. After all, what is wrong with being a white Jewish girl from Kansas City?


      Delete
    2. Guess this opens a whole can o'worms about entertainers, chiefly Jews and Italians, who anglicized their names: Tony Bennett (Anthony Benedetto), Kirk Douglas (Issur Danielovitch), John Garfield (Jacob Garfinkle), Dean Martin (Dino Crocetti), Jerry Lewis (Joseph Levitch), and Lauren Bacall (Betty Perske).

      Or women novelists who published using men's names: George Eliot, Lionel Shriver, Isak Dinesen.

      While most of the people mentioned were not trying to "pass" by using stage or pen names, there was a perceived professional (and therefore personal) advantage in confusing the issue.

      Louis Prima muddied the waters about his ethnic background. African- and Italian-Americans played jazz together in New Orleans where he grew up. When he toured segregated Indianapolis in the 1940s, when Dad saw him, Prima would play a white club on Friday and a black club on Saturday.

      I think social critics have pointed out that Americans, who live in a stew of ethnic influences, are cultural if not "blood" hybrids. As a singer, is Janis Joplin less "black" than Tina Turner?

      Delete
    3. "...Americans...are cultural if not "blood" hybrids." Good point. And come to think of it, most of us are blood hybrids too, in one way or another.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. Several years ago, when one of our sons married a young woman of Viet Namese heritage, two marriage ceremonies were held. The first was the traditional Viet Namese marriage Tea Ceremony, which took place at her parents' house with mostly family and very close friends. Very traditional with many interesting customs. The second was a nuptial mass late in the afternoon, held in the chapel of a convent that made their grounds and other buildings available for wedding receptions, bar mitzvahs, and other celebrations. That was the western wedding. My d-i-l's mother contacted me ahead to ask me if I wanted her to buy me some silk material for an au dai for the morning celebration. The au dai is the traditional long tunic style dress that is split down the sides and worn over silk pants. Since she offered, had I chosen, I would not have felt that they would look at me wearing an au dai as cultural appropriation. However, I declined because I felt that I would feel like I was dressed for a costume party since my Irish looks don't "go with" an au dai and I feared some of their Viet Namese family and friend also might have had questions about it. I wore long, loose, gauzy pants with a jacket instead, sort of a western variation on the au dai. I hope they weren't offended, but I would not have felt comfortable.

      At the afternoon wedding, my son and his bride wore western attire, instead of Viet Namese. They had both worn Viet Namese attire for the morning Tea Ceremony. There were 300 guests at the evening wedding, with the reception held outdoors (California in June). Most of the guests were Viet Namese, and most of the women wore au dais (they are very elegant). But most of the men were dressed in western attire. My d-i-law changed out of her traditional white western wedding gown for the reception - she again wore an au dai, but a different one than she had worn in the morning. The morning au dai was red - the traditional bride's color in Viet Nam. The evening au dai at the reception was more floral with softer colors.

      This is how my son and d-i-law dressed for the morning Tea Ceremony.

      https://tinyurl.com/y2f2og7e

      Delete
    6. Katherine: "...Americans...are cultural if not "blood" hybrids." Good point. And come to think of it, most of us are blood hybrids too, in one way or another.

      This is increasingly true. My heritage is almost all Irish and German (Catholic), 50-50, but the German was slightly diluted with a bit of French long ago. My husband's heritage is German (Protestant) and UK - English and Scottish heritage. My husband's last name is usually assumed to indicate Jewish heritage and so when my kids went to college, among the greetings for them, was an invitation from Hillel so that they could continue their Jewish traditions. I suspect a DNA test might find some Jewish heritage way back in Germany/Prussia during one of the eras of forced conversions to christianity (convert or die, and convert or you wife and children will die - pretty powerful incentive) Some of the family features on his German side are often associated with Jewish people.

      But our grandchildren really show the changes - one set have German, Irish, French, English, Scottish, and Jamaican(heritage originally from Nigeria according to my d-i-law's DNA test). The next set have the same European/British Isles roots, with the addition of their 50% Viet Namese heritage. The third set has our family's German, Irish etc, as well as their mother's heritage - she was born and raised in France, but her mother is Polish and she holds dual citizenship. All European, but no longer only western European. The numbers of inter-racial, inter-cultural marriages have risen very fast during the last 20 or so years.

      Delete
    7. One of my husband's classmates served in Vietnam in the military, and married a girl from over there. They came back to our hometown and had a big family. She wore some quite elegant garments to church. I never knew what they were called, but must have been an au dai. Her name was Khuyen. Everyone pronounced it "Quinn", I don't know if that was a correct approximation.

      Delete
    8. I'm embarrassed - I spelled it wrong - it's ao dai not au dai. Elegant dresses.

      My d-i-law was born in a refugee camp in Indonesia. Her parents were "boat people" who escaped a few years after the end of the war. Her parents escaped with a lot of extended family on both sides, most of whom now live in the Silicon Valley. Most of the 300 wedding guests were relatives. So a very Viet Namese wedding! Most Viet Namese christians were Catholic, but were only about 8% of the total population.

      Delete
    9. Unfortunately Khuyen passed away in December. When she came over it was war era. No travel in or out of Vietnam for a long time, and she endured a long separation from her family, until her two sisters moved here sometime in the 80s. I don't think she ever saw her parents again.

      Delete
    10. So sad for the refugees who ended up here. They were safe, but most never did see some loved ones who were left behind. My d-I- laws parents and all their 3 children have been back several times now. I don’t remember when it opened up again. They were all US citizens by then, traveling on American passports.

      Delete
    11. Immigration is almost always sad. Something like a third of American immigrants return/ed home. My Welsh ancestors left upstate New York because they missed home, but a son stayed, fought in the Civil War (Union), and that's why we're here.

      My Irish ancestors were very bitter people, hated it here, found that farming in the U.S. kept them only slightly less poor than whatever they were doing in Ireland (weaving? linen trade? something to do with textiles? Aunt Grace changed the story every time she told it). For reasons that were never clear to me, my grandfather and his siblings all yearned to "go back" to Ireland, even though they were born here. I'm not sure what they thought they were going to find.

      Delete
    12. People think they will find something better, and when it doesn't turn out the way they thought it would, they idealize the past. I get the idea that sometimes pioneering works out better for the men than it does for the women. I suppose it depends on what they were used to before.

      Delete
    13. Katherine, have you read Women's Diaries of the Westward Journey (ed. Lillian Schlissel)? It bears out in spades what you said about pioneering. Women had so much to lose on these treks.

      Delete
    14. No, I haven't read that, but i know the stories of my own pioneer ancestors. There was a suicide, and tales of homesickness and despair. On the other hand, some of the women seem to have adapted well and made a success of things. I think it had to do with expectations.

      Delete
  8. Unrelated, a USPS carrier just delivered a package to my doorstep. I thought a federal holiday was a day off for them? Are they trying to work through a backlog? What I wish for the postal service leading up to the election is stability.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also for the Census Bureau. Wilbur Ross may have slept through Cabinet meetings, but his job was to either find all the undocumented aliens or screw up the constitutionally mandated census to a fare-thee-well. There wasn't time for the first, but he seems to have accomplished the second, for the first time in 230 years.

      Delete