Sunday, August 9, 2020

Taking risks

 This is my homily for today, the 19th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Cycle A.  The readings for today (in a new USCCB website format!) are here.

Thank you for gathering here today.  The obligation to attend mass has been suspended, so legally, none of us had to be here today – and yet here we are.  There could be even more of us: St. Edna is permitted to have as many as 100 attendees at each mass.  But I don’t blame anyone who elects to stay away during this time of the pandemic.  There is a certain amount of danger, a certain amount of risk, in any group gathering these days.  I’m sure that each of us weighed the potential risks of being here before we registered to attend.  Of course, St. Edna is taking many measures to help mitigate the risk – the masks, the face shields, the Purell, the social distancing, the disinfecting of the church after mass. 

Most of us are risk-averse.  We’re taught to avoid unnecessary and foolish risks.  Still, most of the major life decisions we will make require that we take risks.  My asking Therese to marry me was a risk: there was a risk she would say no.  Fortunately for me, she said yes – which was risky on her part.  Any couple who agrees to get married is taking a leap into the unknown – none of us knows how our lives will turn out, so marriage is a risky proposition.   Other big decisions carry risk, too: picking a college, applying for a job, starting a business.  When Therese and I signed a mortgage, we committed to spend an amount of money that is a multiple of our annual income.  That’s risky.  My great-grandparents, who were poor European farmers a hundred years ago, chose to bring their family to this faraway country, America – a tremendous risk.

It turns out that having faith in Jesus, and leading a life of faithful discipleship, can be risky, too.  In fact, if we’re not taking risks when we follow Jesus, we’re probably not doing it right. 

We just heard a reading about some risk-taking.  The disciples were in trouble – they were stuck at sea, at night, several miles from shore.  These days, when we venture out in a boat, we have risk mitigation strategies: lifejackets, radios to call for help, a Coast Guard.  None of those things existed in those days.  Any voyage was risky.   In this difficult situation, undoubtedly they were praying, “Dear God, help us!”  

And here comes Jesus, walking across the water toward them.  Had the disciples been in a condition at that moment to stop and contemplate what was happening, they might have thought to themselves, “Huh - it’s almost as if he came in answer to our prayers.”  And that the elements of nature, so perilous to us, apparently were nothing for him to worry about.  As it is, by the end of the story, they were confessing that truly he is the Son of God.  God helps us when we need help.  When perils are besetting us and we are at risk, God listens, and God comes to our rescue.

Then Peter spoke up.  Good old Peter – how can you not love this guy?  Filled with good intentions, always the first one to speak up but not always one to carry through.  Haven’t all of us known Peters in our own lives?  Don’t all of us have a little bit of Peter inside ourselves: longing to be the hero, but falling short of actual heroism?

We’ve all heard of Doubting Thomas; this Gospel passage should get us thinking a bit about Doubting Peter. Because Peter doubts. He’s not certain it’s really Jesus.  Peter’s faith has not yet been perfected.  So Peter decides to put Jesus to the test: he says, “Lord, if it is you, command me to come to you on the water.”  That qualifying “if” – *if* it is you – that little word “if” is the quintessence of the frailty of human faith.  Sometimes it’s strong; sometimes it’s not so strong.  Had Peter possessed perfect faith, he wouldn’t have said “if”.  He would have said, “Lord, I *know* it is you, and I am going to come to you on the water.”  I don’t say this to criticize Peter.  Would any of us have done any better?  

And Peter may also have been the most surprised guy in the boat when Jesus took him up on his offer and said, “Come”.  And we know what happened next: Peter, either because he is courageous, or because he had said he’d do it, and knew everyone was watching him, and he couldn’t back out now, leaps over the side of the boat – and begins to walk on water himself!  But after a little of this, the “Hey, wait a minute” part of him kicked in – the part that says, “Hey, wait a minute: dude, you’re walking on water – are you crazy?  That’s impossible!”   And consequently, Peter begins to sink.   When his faith was strong, he could do amazing things.  But when his faith was weak, he reverted back to normal.  That “Hey, wait a minute” instinct, that little risk-management trip-alarm we all have built in, occasionally saves us from foolish risks and bad decisions, but it can also interfere with our faith.  Following Jesus doesn't mean staying in our normal life; it means allowing him to transform us.  If we’re really going to follow Jesus, at some point, we need to let go of the side of the boat and jump into the water. 

And so, what happens next?  If you take anything away from today’s Gospel passage, please take this with you:  Jesus, who really is divine, who really reads and understands our hearts, who knows darn well that we all want to be heroes but really aren’t heroes, and who loves us in spite of our frailties and imperfections – Jesus stretched out his hand and caught Peter, and helped him to safety.

If we’re going to be disciples, we’re going to have to take risks.  We’re going to have to deny ourselves, when every human instinct in our body tells us to protect ourselves.  We’re going to have to swallow our “Hey, wait a minute!” instincts, and grasp Jesus’ hand which is outstretched to us. 

There are people around us who do this already.  I heard recently from one of our parishioners, a nurse.  She is working with COVID patients, the sickest of the sick.  Every day at work, she is putting herself at risk of contracting this terrible and deadly disease.  My admiration for her knows no bounds.  What a wonderful example of Christian discipleship she is for us. 

Do you have the courage, and the appetite for risk, to do what she is doing?  Perhaps not.  Not all of us are called to serve others as she is.  I am certain, though, that God is calling us to serve others in some way.  And that will involve taking risks.  We can’t be disciples and lead risk-averse lives.  Being a follower of Jesus means that, from time to time, we need to leap over the side of the boat.  For my friend the nurse, that means treating COVID patients.  For someone else, leaping over the side of the boat might mean speaking up publicly against injustice – something which I suspect many of us have a difficult time doing.  For another, it might mean spending a great deal of one’s savings to help a family member in need – there are so many families in need during this time of high unemployment and economic slowdown.  All of us will encounter times and circumstances to jump out of the boat and into life’s stormy waters.  And that’s risky.  We might sink.  But we should take comfort, and take courage, in remembering that when Peter started to sink, Jesus stretched out a hand to help him.  I’m confident that Jesus will do the same for us.

33 comments:

  1. I picture Peter stepping out of the boat with a "come along, guys" gesture, and looking back to see his mates retying their sandals, studying their fingernails or fascinated by something on the other side of the boat. At least he tried.

    I also think about Jesus. Last Sunday we were told that "when he heard of the death of John the Baptist" he went to a deserted place to pray. It had just been brought home to him that his mission wasn't going to be all preaching and healing; he faced real danger. Then, instead of giving him space, people turned his deserted place into Times Square, and he had to feed their hearts and guts. Then, after a trying day, he sent off the disciples so he could get in some time with his Father, and when he caught up them (six hours later, according to the calculation of an Irish priest yesterday), he found the disciples ignoring the injunction to be not afraid and screaming for help. As usual. Only his main man showed some courage, and Jesus still had to rescue him. Jesus must have been pretty frustrated with needy-greedy humanity by that point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tom: love all of it.

      Re: Peter leading the band of brothers who neglects to follow: there was a Sergio Aragones cartoon from many years ago, wordless as all of his were, and distressingly relevant today, of a hippie protester striding forward to engage a line of cops in street battle, beckoning his group to follow him - and not seeing that his fellow protesters behind him are high-tailing it.

      (Well, I spent just a few seconds looking for that old cartoon. Didn't find it, but here's an article on Aragones and continuing relevance. https://www.cbr.com/sergio-aragones-police-brutality-strips-shock-social-media/)

      Delete
    2. Interesting that you mention Sergio Aragones, the brilliant drawer of marginalia in MAD Magazine here, Jim. I think some of the stories in the Gospel have a humorous as well as metaphorical cast. This is certainly one of them.

      I recently got a copy of cartoonist R. Crumb's comic book version of Genesis. He approached the work after a lot of textual and iconographic study. It is respectful and often joyful. His rendering made me see the stories in a new and more coherent way.

      Delete
    3. Jean, now that you mention it, I believe the cartoon I'm thinking of was one of those margin drawings. I used to have a paperback collection of them - this was decades ago. I'm sure it was in that book.

      Delete
    4. Jean, I just ordered the R Crumb Genesis. Looking forward to it.

      Delete
    5. I will be interested to see what you think, coming from a much more traditional and cradle-Catholic POV than me. It's worth reading his intro first. It explains a lot about how he put together the text and images.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for sharing, good thoughts about risk taking.
    When I was a kid (and even now) this Gospel reading always makes me think, "..just once I would like to find out what it was like to walk on water!" This is from someone who is a lousy swimmer and had some traumatic memories of literally getting in over my head.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting discussion about risk. The Boy has apparently had a lot of time to contemplate things during his period of unemployment. The other day, he was talking about taking risks in people a la the bishop who lets Jean Valjean get away with the silver in "Les Miserables." He suggested that if the bishop was taking a risk on Valjean, that God was taking a risk on both of them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wonderful insight from The Boy, Jean. I've never read Les Miserables, but the overt spirituality in the musical always has struck me. That scene with the bishop is one of my faves.

      Delete
    2. He saw the musical and then read the book. It seems to be one he goes back to a lot.

      To some extent, all literature is Scripture, but as a former literature prof, I would think that.

      Delete
    3. The bishops' candlesticks is one of the great scenes of literature and very Christian. I can't figure out why Holy Mother got pissed at Hugo. Must have been something else. I haven't read many of the Frenchmen. I tried Camus's La Chute and got hung up on the estimable gorilla (page, about 3) and decided I needed buy the translation.

      Delete
    4. I read the book and saw the movie, thought both were great.
      According to Wikipedia Hugo's religious views changed a lot over the course of his lifetime. The article there had this to say:
      "He felt the Church was indifferent to the plight of the working class under the oppression of the monarchy. Perhaps he also was upset by the frequency with which his work appeared on the Church's list of banned books. Hugo counted 740 attacks on Les Misérables in the Catholic press.[34] When Hugo's sons Charles and François-Victor died, he insisted that they be buried without a crucifix or priest. In his will, he made the same stipulation about his own death and funeral.[35]
      "Yet he believed in life after death and prayed every single morning and night, convinced as he wrote in The Man Who Laughs that "Thanksgiving has wings and flies to its right destination. Your prayer knows its way better than you do"
      Sounds like the French church after the revolution may have been ultra-touchy about any perceived criticism. And the "Index of Forbidden Books", was there ever a more irresistible dare to those who had a curious bone in their body?

      Delete
    5. When I studied French at my nice Catholic women's college, we read lots of authors who were on the Index of Forbidden Books. Les Miserables is my very favorite "musical". I look at the story (as told in summary in the musical) as illustrating the entire range of love - love of a man for his sister and her family; love of a bishop for a fellow man who needs help; mother love, unrequited love, brotherly love for friends, fatherly love, love of justice, and, of course, Divine Love which underlies all of the other loves - my favorite line - "to love another person is to see the face of God"

      For an interesting explanation of the Index in general, and the sins of Hugo that got his book placed on it, see this article

      http://www.catholiclane.com/les-miserables-and-the-index/

      Delete
    6. Thanks for that link, Anne. It was very interesting information about the Index. The PTB certainly didn't have any confidence in lay people's abilities of discernment.
      The comments went down some rabbit holes pretty quickly.

      Delete
  4. Personally, I'm taking some risks, the most notable of which is that I'm working with our food pantry clients (although I'm no longer doing that every week).

    This past Saturday we got together with two other couples. I was a little skeptical that this was a good idea, but the expectation was that we'd be seated outside on their deck, appropriately distanced from one another. But when we arrived, the others were inside; it was a warm and humid night. We were sort of distanced from each other, but we didn't wear masks (can't eat and drink with a mask on). Probably not a good risk on our part. Some of them saw it as worth the risk for the sake of mental health. I'm sure that's the same rationale that leads young people to crowd into bars.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We took a similar risk by inviting our son, daughter in law, and granddaughters inside a week or so back. They said they would stay away if we weren't comfortable about it. Offered to stay outside on the deck, but it was warm and humid. It was more important to see them than be 100% safe, which we aren't, in any case. Hadn't seen them since around March 1. Loved being with them in person.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. Katherine, we've been with my parents a few times, too, since the break-out of the pandemic. They're both in their 80s and we're the only members of the family within driving distance for them. Now that daily mass has restarted they have been attending that.

      Delete
    4. We've had the paint guy (long story), the bug guy and the air conditioning guy in lately. All were masked and put on plastic booties before coming in. And our masked neighbor, who is in and out almost every day but stays two hours on Saturday for her church service. She is the vector I worry about, but she is a nurse.

      Delete
    5. Usually phone my dad on Sunday. He is 92 and doesn't go anywhere. He does eat lunch every day with my brother and sister-in-law, who are just across the road from his house. He said sis-in-law's dad was there yesterday, having come up from Arkansas, as well as the grandson who doesn't believe in masks. Dad is pretty zen about it, he doesn't worry too much anymore. So my sister and I call each other up and have a cow about it over the phone. She does his grocery shopping for him , and brings him Communion on Saturday evening. So I guess we need to look at it that he is much happier and probably safer than he would be in an assisted living place.

      Delete
    6. Katherine - it sounds like your dad has a pretty good arrangement. I'd hope to have something like his set-up if I make it to 92.

      Delete
    7. It is a pretty good arrangement, I just wish some of these people would be a bit more careful about protecting themselves and him from the virus.

      Delete
    8. I have many friends trying to juggle elder care, and I wish there were some way to help besides "keeping in touch." One has a 94 yo mother four hours away in the UP. Her sister needs R&R because Ma is difficult (an understatement), so Friend brings Ma down for long stretches to give Sis some time off.

      This means Friend and schizophrenic son who lives with her get a COVID19 test, quarantine until results are in three days later, and then, if test is negative, go get Ma.

      I have no doubt that if my mother were still living, I would have had to move in with her for the duration. Meals on Wheels and other aging services ceased for several weeks when Gov. Whitmer instituted the first emergency order. I would have had to go through the same testing routine in order to go home for visits.

      Just hung my "Chemo Patient: No mask? Not welcome!" sign on my door. I have had everyone from the City Assessor to the cable company salesmen breathing in through my screen door this summer. It drives up my stress levels, not so much because I fear sickness and death, but that it just seems so bone-headed stupid and inconsiderate.

      Delete
    9. The harder it was to do before COVID, it's 10X harder now.
      As for the bone heads, I wonder if one can get one of those old pump insecticide sprayers somewhere. Give 'em a cloud of something in the face since they are verminlike vectors.

      Delete
  5. COVID is a crap shoot. The Twitter link below is an example of what COVID did to a hyperfit 30yo doctor. He had COVID and now has heart failure. Take a look at his profile picture and compare his arms before with the video now. My friend worked with him previously and said he is a really good guy. Anesthesiologists were intimately involved with the worst victims of COVID, performing intubation, extubation, and maintaining the ventilated in a state of sleep. Of course, this means sometimes horrendous exposures

    https://t.co/szetIU26KJ https://twitter.com/anesthesiacbf10/status/1272188976611409923?s=20

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stanley, that's sad about the doctor. You're right, COVID is a crap shoot.

      Delete
    2. I keep hearing--and I think Katherine mentioned it--that there may be a milder and a more virulent strain of covid19. It is inconsistent with Trumpism to admit that the virus causes anything but sniffles except for the elderly in nursing homes, and the tacit attitude there is that they're going to die soon anyway so shrug.

      Delete
    3. I did mention earlier about an L and an S strain. This article explains a little. It had this to say: "...the safest interpretation is that S-strain predates the L-Strain, but that—based on a very limited initial data set—the older strain may have increased in frequency after the initial outbreak." The L strain is not necessarily more deadly (the article title is a little misleading). It is however believed to be more contagious.
      This article talks about six different clusters of symptoms, but doesn't say that they are caused by different strains. But classifying by symptoms may help doctors in determining the best treatment.

      Delete
    4. Katherine, thanks for the clarification!

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Here is a very interesting article about people who test positive but have no symptoms: https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/40-of-people-with-coronavirus-have-no-symptoms-might-they-be-the-key-to-ending-the-pandemic/
    Some researchers say up to 40% have little or no symptoms. They think having been exposed to other coronaviruses in the past may provide some resistance. I think it was Stanley who surmised that the "dose" of virus one is exposed to could make a big difference

    ReplyDelete
  8. Gov. DeWine regularly has stories of how just a little family risk taking has big consequences, e.g. a grandson visited his dying grandfather. Of course the grandfather died a few days later but not of Covid. However the grandson infected many members of the family resulting in at least one hospitalization and the disruption of a family business.

    All of these stories also illustrate the importance of testing and tracing. If you do all that you see that many of these slight risks result in extensive and severe consequences.

    ReplyDelete