Saturday, June 13, 2020

Many to one Body

This is my homily for Sunday, June 14, the Solemnity of the Body and Blood of Christ.  The readings for the day are here.  In addition, at least for the next few days there is a video available of the recording of the mass at which I gave this homily, here.

Today we celebrate the Solemnity of the Body and Blood of Christ.  It’s the day on the church calendar for us to offer our thanks, praise and worship for the gift of the Eucharist.  I could talk for hours about the many meanings and themes of the Eucharist: the Holy Sacrifice, the sacred banquet, the bread for our journey here on earth, the mercy and forgiveness of this sacrament, Christ’s pledge of future glory – all that, and much, much more, is contained within this blessed sacrament.

Today, I’d like to focus on just one of these many dimensions of the Eucharist: the dimension of unity.  The Eucharist is the sacrament of our unity with one another.  St. Paul, in the first letter to the Corinthians from which our 2nd reading was taken today, says this succinctly: “We, though many, are one body.”  

Notice that, contained in these six simple words – “We, though many, are one body” – in those six simple words juxtapose two profound ideas.  We’re many, but we are one body.  Many, and one, at the same time. 

I suppose it’s not news that we are many.  We’re not all the same.  The very same St. Paul, in his Letter to the Galatians, named some of the social divisions that marked his time: Jews and Greeks.  Slaves and free persons.  Males and females.

There is much that is good about diversity, but there is no getting around the fact that throughout human history, up to and including our own day, these social differences often result in distrust and conflict.  Jews and Greeks, with their different religions, viewed one another with mutual suspicion.  Free persons and slaves were entangled in social and economic relationships that were fundamentally unjust.  Relations between males and females could be characterized by infidelity, exploitation and abuse.

All those things are bad.  They were bad in St. Paul’s day, and they’re still with us, and continue to be bad, in our day. 

The Good News is this: such is the power of Christ that the Eucharist is able to overcome even these unjust and exploitative social relationships.  Remember the 2nd part of our six words from St. Paul today: that even though we’re many, *we’re one*. 

Now – here’s the difficult part: the idea isn’t that the Eucharist papers over the problems between ethnicities and races, the injustice, the exploitation and abuse.  Jesus does not mean for the Eucharist to be a thanksgiving for an unjust status quo.  No, the idea is that the grace of the Eucharist gives us new eyes, to see these bad things as they are.  And the Eucharist gives us the spiritual strength to stand against them.  And by addressing the ills that plague our world, we make it possible to be one as Jesus wishes.

If we are followers of Jesus, then we’re called to take part in the work Jesus began, to inaugurate the kingdom of heaven, even right here on earth.  If we take Jesus seriously that we’re all called to be one, then we must be willing to be peacemakers – blessed are the peacemakers – where division and conflict reign.  If we take Jesus seriously that we’re all called to be one, then we must be willing to bring about justice where injustice reigns.  If we take Jesus seriously that we’re all called to be one, then we must be willing to go and stand in solidarity with victims of exploitation and abuse and stand up for human dignity and security. 

Because if we allow conflict and injustice and exploitation to fester and grow, then we’re really not one.  We’re just many – the sinful many.  And that’s not what Jesus wants. That’s not what he prayed for on the night before he died – he didn’t pray that we all continue to be many – separated from each other, suspicious of one another and inflicting injuries on another.  He prayed that we be *one* - that instead of being separated, we be unified, in him.  That instead of being suspicious of one another, that we be able to join hands – or, these days, at least come to within six feet of one another – in trust and peace and love.  And that instead of exploiting one another, we serve one another’s needs.
 
As followers of Jesus, we want to build God’s kingdom.  We don’t want our marriages and families to be unfaithful and abusive – we want them to be nurturing and full of love.  We don’t want our civic life and our workplaces to be instruments of injustice and exploitation; we want them to be places of human dignity and justice.  We don’t want relations between nations, peoples, races and religions to be filled with mutual distrust and suspicion – we want them to enable peace and human flourishing.  We want Jesus’s vision of *unity* to be realized, even in our lives here on earth.

The great tragedy of the death of George Floyd seems to have awakened many Americans to the existence of some continuing injustices in our society.  The video of his killing seem to have given new sight to eyes that formerly were blind.  As a people, we have found ourselves in a moment.  Out of George Floyd’s unjust death, could there have arisen a moment of grace, a moment to overcome injustice with justice, to overcome exploitation with equal dignity under the law?  The answers to those questions are for us, the People of God and the people of the United States, to discern.  But my prayer for us as a people and a nation today is that we let our discernment be guided by our vision of the Eucharist – that we are all to be united: in love and thanksgiving, in mercy and forgiveness, in healing and justice and dignity.

16 comments:

  1. Ut unum sint. We spend endure a lot of pain and nonsense in trying to hold off that day. Nice job, Jim. I saw George Floyd coming pretty early, and I am wondering what kind of feedback you are getting from the "good people, we can all come together if you all will just be like me" brigade?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Since nobody can corner me in the nartgex after mass these days, I haven't been yelled at yet, at least until I check my parish mailbox. It got good reviews from the fam this morning.

      Delete
  2. Jim, good thoughts on the Eucharistic dimension of unity, which is certainly badly needed now.

    Our priest, at the Mass I attended this morning, waxed very theological, quoting Ignatius of Antioch and Irenaeus of Lyons. I wished he would have spent a little time talking about how the sacrament is an affair of the heart, demanding a response from those who receive it. Jesus told Mary Magdalene at the tomb not to cling to him, because he had not yet ascended to the Father. Now he has, and we can cling to him.

    We used to recite or sing the Corpus Christi sequence, Thomas Aquinas' Lauda Sion (English version). Within the last 10 or 15 years it has apparently been dropped. I liked it, though I would not have wanted to recite the whole thing through a mask. Sometimes the choir would sing three or four verses of it set to a familiar hymn tune. My parents didn't like it, said it was lousy poetry. But it was a translation from Latin, and someone tried to make the ends of the lines rhyme.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All of the sequences seem to ave been retired everywhere without much comment.

      Delete
    2. I miss the Pentecost sequence. It is shorter than Lauda Sion, and gives people a chance to consider the work of the Holy Spirit. I think the Easter one, Victmae Paschale Laudes, is still an option, though we didn't do it. I have a recording of an instrumental version of it, played on a harp, which is lovely.
      Nobody misses Dies Irae, the requiem sequence.

      Delete
    3. Bad spelling, should be "Victimae Paschali Laudes"

      Delete
    4. Right. I don't ever remember doing any of the sequences ever, save perhaps once or twice when I was a child.

      In the normal, pre-COVID course of things, the tyranny of the clock argues against it. Musically, our choir is off for the summer by this Sunday every year (Pentecost always is the last Sunday of the season) so there is no rehearsal time to teach this sequence to a choir, and of course the people aren't familiar with it unless it's done every year, which it isn't.

      I don't know what the history of this sequence is but it feels like something that came out of a monastery, where time for praise and thanksgiving preempts everything else.

      Delete
    5. Veni Sancte Spiritus has an interesting history. Dates from the 13th century. Attributed to either Pope Innocent III or Cardinal Stephen Langston, archbishop of Canterbury. Thete are many musical settings for it, but my favorite is John Michael Talbot's, very meditative.

      Delete
    6. Going back (which no one wants to do) to Dies Irae, it was a point of pride for the founding editor of NCR, Bob Hoyt, that he pronounced both of the l's in the second line, "dies illa." It has to be dies ill-lla, not dies ila. Claimed it was the only part of his seminary training he expected to remember after death.

      Delete
    7. The saving grace of Dies Irae being used at funerals was that it was in Latin, and most people didn't know the translation. "Day of wrath and doom impending...Heaven and earth in ashes ending" Not a thing to comfort the grieving. That went away with VII.

      Delete
  3. BTW Jim, St. Edna's is a nice looking church. The music was good in addition to a good homily. Are any parishioners able to attend yet, or is it still virtual only?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Katherine, thanks for saying that about the old home. Our cantor this past Sunday was one of our best. The accompanist during this COVID time is not one of our regulars; she is a friend of the pastor's. Our music director is on medical leave.

      No parishioners are attending yet. Our parish hasn't yet been certified by the archdiocese. Our pastor is planning to begin Sunday masses during the July 4th weekend. He's trying not to rush it and do it the right way. He also mentioned that, as he's our only priest, were he to become infected, at best he'd need to self-quarantine and we'd be without a priest for a couple of weeks. So I think he's hoping the virus continues to abate in Illinois (which, for the last month, it's been doing pretty steadily).

      Delete
    2. So far, so good with our partial reopening. Pews are distanced, everyone wears a mask. One lector, no servers. The priest and deacon (or one EMHC) distribute Communion.
      The dispensation is still in place and probably will be for the immediate future. They are still livestreaming/recording. Running about 20% of normal capacity.
      We only have one priest also. What you said about the priest having to quarantine happened in one parish in Omaha. They are out of commission for at least two weeks.
      Ministry to the homebound seems to still be falling between the cracks. But a neighboring parish is doing drive-up Communion for shut-ins. I assume a family member could be delegated. The church needs to think outside the box more than they are doing.
      Will let you know how our Q-tip Confirmation goes in a couple of weeks.

      Delete
    3. Katherine, re: the Q-tip Confirmation: that's how we're doing the anointing now at baptisms, too. It's a little different. Not as satisfactory as a sign; I like to put more oil on the babies than a Q-tip can administer. Although I don't get as carried away as some celebrants who pretty much drench the baby's head with the stuff.

      Delete
  4. FYI - One of the local news outlets interviewed Anthony Fauci last week, as the DC area begins to slowly reopen (cases are spiking in DC itself though at the moment. He lives in the city itself). They asked him several questions about what activities he would be willing to engage in at this time.

    Would he take an airplane trip? No - because of his age (79). He added that if he were a healthy 30 year old who really needed to fly somewhere, he would probably take the chance. But not at his age. Next - would he eat in a restaurant? Yes, but - outdoors and only if properly distanced tables and all servers and workers wearing masks. No - to eating indoors at a restaurant.

    Would he go to church (he is Catholic). No - unless they have an outdoor mass with lots of space. They did not ask him about communion. I'm guessing he would say No.

    ReplyDelete