Saturday, February 1, 2020

Sunday of the Word of God

Rita Ferrone has written a pair of articles about this past Sunday's initial celebration of Sunday of the Word of God.  Rita shows a laudatory willingness to try something new.  We should hope that church leadership can exhibit that same willingness.

A few days ago, I mentioned that, in spite of being warned ahead of time that Pope Francis had declared that the 3rd Sunday in Ordinary Time is now to be celebrated as the Sunday of the Word of God, I managed to compose a homily that failed to acknowledge it.

What made my forgetfulness even harder to fathom was that I had actually taken part in an electronic discussion a few weeks earlier in which we decided how our parish would mark the day.  In our case, our pastor acknowledged the occasion in his greeting at the beginning of mass; we enthroned the Book of the Gospels after the Gospel was proclaimed (in our case, "enthroning" meant placing the book, open to the Gospel of the day, on a podium that was set up in front of the ambo, facing toward the people); one of our petitions during the Prayers of the Faithful was that the Word would be planted in our hearts; and at each mass we blessed any lectors who were present.

As it happens, Rita Ferrone has written two articles on the occasion.  For the Love of the Word, on the Commonweal website, reflects on what a good idea Francis has had:
... how lovely this day could be: a shot in the arm for religious devotion, spiritual growth, and theological literacy, and a dose of fresh energy for ecumenism. What Francis proposed is that the Third Sunday of Ordinary Time will be observed henceforth as a day on which to renew our love and gratitude for the Word of God. It includes a call to “enthrone the Word” during the liturgy, to give out Bibles, and to promote reading and reflection on sacred Scripture by people in all walks of life. Such an observance could enhance the Eucharist, and help us to better realize the hopes of the Second Vatican Council that the Word would stand at the heart of prayer, catechesis, and preaching, becoming “the soul of sacred theology” (Dei verbum 24).
She notes, though, in a way that points uncannily to my own personal inattentiveness, that the American church didn't exactly pick up the ball and run with it, at least in its initial reception:
Contrary to the wonderment that greeted so many of his other plans, his initiative on a religious topic of relevance to every believer got lackluster treatment. There were dutiful acknowledgements but hardly an enthusiastic response. Most Catholics I know didn’t even hear about it.
She considers reasons for the underwhelming level of excitement: the Catholic media environment in the US is geared toward controversy, and this is not a controversial topic, so the announcement from Francis probably didn't make many most-read lists.  She also notes, rightly in my opinion, that Catholics since the Second Vatican Council, and even going back to Pius XII's pontificate, have been urged to read the bible, study it, and incorporate its treasures more richly in our worship than was previously the case.  As Rita notes, "Perhaps we feel we’ve already “been there, done that.”"

But then, Francis-like, she deftly punctures our bubble of American complacency:
North American Catholics who lived through the Council know that an explosion of interest in the scriptures followed it, but that passion gradually faded. In Latin America, however, Scripture reading became an integral part of the daily life of the Christian base communities and achieved lasting significance as a lay phenomenon.
This is a development of which I was previously unaware.  Rita highlights two Argentinian bishops from the immediate pre- and post-Conciliar periods, Jorge Kemerer and Alberto Devoto, who did much to build up Scripture reading among the faithful in remote areas of Argentina.  And she closes by suggesting that our Argentinian pontiff may well have had this heritage in mind in exhorting the rest of the world to renew its attentiveness to the Table of the Word each year.

Rita followed up her article with a blog post at Pray Tell entitled, "More Important Than It Looks", in which she shares how her own parish celebrated the Sunday of the Word of God.  She admits that she didn't have high expectations.
Pope Francis said people have been clamoring for a day to celebrate the Word. Frankly, I wasn’t hearing a clamor. More like a murmur. A woman I know, a very experienced pastoral associate, once told me “Whenever you survey a congregation they all say they want Bible study. But then you host a Bible study and they don’t come.” This has been, more or less, my experience too.
But in the event, her expectations were exceeded:
In fact, I was incredibly moved by how my own Sunday worshiping community chose to celebrate. Before Mass began, there was a brief, well-worded introduction alerting us to this new observance. The hymns were fabulous, and each one was chosen to both connect to the scriptures of the day and to celebrate the power of God’s Word through the Word made flesh. The presider’s opening remarks also helped us to focus on the character of this observance. They were concise, apt, enthusiastic, and well-chosen. We knew from the start why this day was important and what the focus really was.
What blew me away, however, was a liturgical action: the Gospel procession was done up in a bold manner for this occasion. It was splendid. It was magnificent. It was inspiring. The priest and ministers walked the long way around the church, carrying the gospel book aloft in all its glory. There were banners, candles, incense. The music! An outpouring of joy. I was transported by the alleluias. Then, after the reading of the gospel, the book was enthroned. The preaching that followed was powerful.
The preaching?  Ouch.  But I guess I should rejoice that at least one preacher not only got the memo, but remembered it.

But more broadly speaking, I really appreciate being able to read about things that are done right, or more than right, in other parishes.  They stimulate the imagination and expand the list of possibilities for one's own parish.  (May one add that they also get the competitive juices flowing a bit?).  I am going to share this piece with our pastor and music director.

I've been in pastoral ministry long enough to know that most ministry professionals, both clerical and lay, are averse to change, just like leaders in the corporate world.  Even when a new pastor or ministry director comes into a parish, their "fresh ideas" often are simply practices that they import from previous stops, which they like better than whatever their new parish has been doing.

In the context of this widespread resistance to chance, there is great value in Rita's imaginative embrace of Francis's initiative.  Francis is proposing something that really is new - if, like Rita, we have eyes to see and ears to hear.

It wouldn't surprise me to learn that most parishes were rather minimal in their embrace of the Sunday of the Word of God, or perhaps ignored it completely.  That would be both telling and unfortunate.  Parishes whose leaders are mostly intent upon preserving the status quo are probably parishes that will soon be in trouble, or already are.  My observation is that, both within and outside the church, this is an era of rapid cultural change.  Parishes - and especially their leaders - will need to become nimble and open to change.  Most of the parish leadership around here is aging and entrenched; those characteristics usually aren't hallmarks of openness to change.  Will it take a new generation of Catholic leaders to steer the church where it needs to go?  I hope we have that much time.

24 comments:

  1. I suppose my parish rates as minimal in its observance. Carrying the Gospel book in the opening procession, movement from the altar to the ambo by the deacon during the Gospel acclamation and movement from he ambo to the ambry (a reversed ambo), where it remains open for the rest of Mass, are all standard operating procedure. The last bit, the ambry, is, I guess, a bit unusual. At least it always produces a wave of people sitting down after the Gospel as they did for years, and then jumping up for the alleluia singing. What I'm saying is, we make a bigger deal, movement-wise, over the Gospel than a lot of churches, but we didn't make it bigger for Word Sunday.

    I don't think it would hurt the Church in America if Rita were made a cardinal. As it stands, we have gazillions of Catholics who in no way equate the Word, if they think of it at all, with Scripture. So it's past time to start them out at the "this is the football" stage. From the usher's bench I see many unedifying practices that have developed that people use to get them through the talking parts while waiting for the "real Mass." I lay this to the requirement that homilies should be related to the readings, which means there is no time for instruction in what the readings are -- or in whole lot of other Catholic things many Catholics never heard in post-Vat II catechesis or have forgotten. When you poll them, they want to hear more about the Bible; when you offer it outside Mass, they don't come.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tom, I think you make a good point that an occasion like the Sunday of the Word of God is tailor-made for a catechetical homily, which, as you note, we preachers are taught to avoid, because catechetical preaching is reputed to have been the pre-conciliar norm which V2 reformed. (I say "reputed to have been" because I can't speak first-hand to what was done in those days). Even if preaching from the scriptures (or the texts of the liturgy of the day, something which is quite neglected) is the norm, I think a bit of catechetical content from time to time is ok, and in fact appreciated by people.

      I am also of the opinion that, of the four Constitutional "pillars" of Vatican II, the one on the Word of God is the most neglected.

      Delete
  2. Well I was completely surprised when this was announced in Church last Sunday. I have no idea when Francis decided on doing this, why, etc. The media simply did not cover it.

    On the other hand, the parish where I worshiped did have the enthroned gospel, and the bulletin and homily covered that Francis had instituted this. Actually they did better on this than on covering most of the things that Francis has been during, e.g. on climate change and the environment, migration, etc. When he instituted a Sunday to focus on the poor, it was ignored. I guess it may have been because scripture is not controversial.

    During Benedict’s reign Rome had a Synod on the Word. It was completely ignored at the parish level.

    I agree that laity do want bible study, however my experience is that they are not getting what they need.

    When I was on pastoral council, the council asked the parish what they wanted for adult education and the top item by far was bible study.

    The people who showed up for bible study( about 40 to 60) were mostly people who were already familiar with bible study from their Protestant background or because they had gone to non-Catholic bible study. What we got where actually people who were willing to be bible study leaders in the parish. We got people from all aspects of parish life (liturgy, religious education, social justice) who were eager to apply scripture to their ministries.

    The pastor and his staff (we are one of the ten largest parishes in the diocese) should have decided to give Bible Study the priority that was given to programs such as RENEW that had 200 people spread out over 20 groups.

    Why did that not happen? First the pastor and the paid staff did not want to spend time on it. Second none of them had the interest and competency to provide the leadership. There was far more of that in us volunteers than in the paid staff.

    We used the Little Rock Bible Study, which is basically a good program build around four elements. Personal study of 15 minutes a day using the Collegeville Bible Commentaries. Weekly small group meetings to discuss what has been studied. A large group video produced by Little Rock that covers the materials. Prayer, the fourth element, was included in personal, small group, and large group activities.

    I was impressed by the model, collected data on the process and presented a paper at the American Psychological Association annual meeting in 2009 (unfortunately they do not archive the complete paper)

    Little Rock was designed for parish groups to do on their own. That is both a strength and a weakness. It covers over the complete lack of professional scripture talent at the parish level.

    Here in Cleveland it would be very easy to remedy that. We have the seminary and three colleges plus and Ecumenical Institute that provide courses at very reasonable, adult continuing education rates.

    Why aren't the diocese and the parishes promoting these courses and empowering laity in their parishes. The answer is simple. Any lay person who had this expertise would have a leadership position that would be a challenge to the existing parish leadership structure including the pastor and the priests. I had all the qualifications to do that (the equivalent of master's degree in scripture), and the time to do that. I was never asked. I did some small things to assume some leadership beyond my role in parish council; those were promptly dismissed. The pastor wanted to satisfy the people who were interested but did not want to put any more effort into developing bible study. He certainly did want to empower me since most of the people in the parish know that my expertise in many areas is greater than the priests.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jack, thanks for these insights.

      Two of us converts found ourselves together at a Bible study weekend in another parish. There was no "program," just a close reading of one or two lines chosen from that week's Sunday reading. We were both struck by how immersive it was, and how sharing thoughts in groups of three or four and then in the larger group opened up many insights that the lay leader was able to connect with larger Church teaching.

      We approached our priest about starting a Bible study in our parish. He wanted us to use Little Rock, which would have turned us into facilitators and planners rather than participants. We asked for something more informal that he would help moderate and described what we had experienced at the neighboring parish. He agreed with some reservations.

      At the initial meeting the majority of people were Protestant converts, most of whom I had never seen before and never saw again when the program failed.

      The Church Ladies said that Bible study would be "a nice thing for you folks," I guess meaning converts, and failed to give their imprimatur or attend.

      The Catholics who did attend were dismissive of studying and kept going off text to say things to their spouses like, "Just be Catholic!" I guess the idea is that if you get the saving power of the body and blood, you don't need the rest of it.

      Anyway, it was dead after a few months. I feel that it's failure was my fault, in part. The priest told us we weren't charismatic enough to keep it going. Not sure what he meant by that. The Church Ladies roped me into lectoring for a while, but I quit that when I decided not to receive anymore.

      Delete
    2. Whenever the Little Rock program comes up, someone volunteers that it is "pricey." Matthew Kelly and Steve Bollmer are free or nearly free. They fall more into the categories of "motivational" and "self-help" than "Bible," but they are not "pricey." You get what you pay for.

      Delete
    3. https://www.ncronline.org/news/parish/matthew-kelly-finds-success-influence-catholic-author-and-speaker

      https://www.ncronline.org/news/parish/new-matthew-kelly-program-sees-parishes-fertile-market-consulting

      https://www.ncronline.org/news/parish/matthew-kellys-companies-do-business-nonprofit-he-founded

      Besides Kelly, my two former RC parishes use former Protestant bible studies - Scott Hahn and Jeff clavins

      Delete
    4. We're in a group that has been going for about a year and a half now. I guess I would call it more of a prayer group than Bible study, though we are using Bible readings. There are between 12 and 20 people who attend. We take a scripture reading and do a lectio divina approach with it. People share whatever insights or questions they have. We wrap it up with intercessory prayer. We limit the time to an hour, which I think is a good idea. It isn't like a class where if you miss a session you're going to fall behind. There is a core group of people who are there most of the time, but if people want to just show up and check it out, that is fine. It is interesting that two of the regulars are a couple of young people with Asperger's. It seems to be something they are comfortable with. Our pastor has showed up a few times, but he stayed in the background. The leaders are laypeople, and we have no text or materials other than a printout of the Scripture reading.

      Delete
    5. Katherine, that sounds nice, and sorta what we were going for.

      Delete
    6. About your priest saying your group wasn't charismatic enough, if he meant that in the sense of speaking in tongues and that sort of thing, I think that would scare people off.

      Delete
    7. No, Father wasn't high on charismatics. I think he thought we just couldn't inspire people and get them interested, didn't have good leadership skills or an exciting presentation.

      I try not to overanalyze what went wrong.

      Delete
    8. Jack, I am very frustrated to read about your lack of support from parish leadership and staff. They should realize that a person like you, who is both motivated and in possession of some expertise, can run with getting a program off the ground. Especially for a program like Little Rock, there is very little they need to do! There is no need for them to hire or develop expertise - it's in the parish already. And it's baked into the Little Rock offering already.

      To my way of thinking, contemporary parish leadership consists of recognizing the gifts that the Holy Spirit already has ladled out, and providing the organizational support to enable those gifts to be used. To my mind, "enable" in this case means, "Help promote the existence of the program to the parishioners", and "make meeting space available". Why would parish leadership *not* want to help something like that get off the ground?!

      Delete
  3. This is the first I heard of the Sunday of the Word of God. I asked my husband if he heard anything about it. He said yes, it was brought up at a clergy meeting. Somebody asked what color of vestments they were supposed to wear. The answer was green. We had green. But no mention of the Sunday of the Word of God was made at Mass. They were promoting the tri-parish mission, which was the first four evenings of the week. We didn't get there.
    It always takes awhile for new stuff to catch on, maybe next year we will do better with observing the feast.

    About Bible study classes, one place where they are very well attended is the county jail. I have shared before that DH is on the jail ministry team. We don't get just local lawbreakers here, they farm out overflow from Omaha and Lincoln to the outstate county jails. At any rate the Bible study classes by both the Catholic and Protestant teams are well attended.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jail is so boring that you'll do anything to break the monotony, apparently. My dad used to attend these during his conviction for DUI to break the monotony of work detail and cards. He said they were more interesting than the mandated AA meetings.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, I think boredom has a lot to do with people turning out for Bible classes in jail. Hopefully maybe they can get something useful out of it. The team isn't out to convert anyone; it's very much a "meet them where they are" type of ministry.
      You wouldn't believe the hoops you have to jump through to do jail ministry, and the restrictions that apply. For instance, only paperback Bibles with no staples, no pencils or pens. You're there at the sufferance of management.

      Delete
    3. I would believe the hoops. Our old Episcopal priest told us that a friend was preparing some women prisoners for baptism. They seemed sincere and went through a six-month prep program. They were going to immerse the women, who took baptismal robes to a separate room to change. When they didn't come out, the guard went to check and found they'd tied the robes together and half of them had already scaled down the wall. Baptisms were strictly of the sprinkle variety after that.

      Delete
    4. We went to our Bible group last night. Had to listen to a bunch of church people tsk-tsking and ain-it-awfulling about J-Lo's half-time act and costume. I didn't say anything, I was jealous. I couldn't have pulled it off when I was 18, let alone 50.

      Delete
    5. Katherine - lol 😀
      https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/opinion/jlo-superbowl-performance.html

      Delete
    6. Good one, Anne! We never give ourselves a break. Makes me think of my grandmother, who was never a vain person. But one time, when she was at least 80, she asked me if a certain dress made her look matronly. Of course I said, "No Nana, you never look matronly!"

      Delete
  4. Jim, what did your parish do for the Presentation/Candlemas today? We had a solemn entrance, but did everything inside the church. Since tomorrow is St. Blaise's feast, they had the blessing of throats after Mass. I told my husband they could have done it all in one when they were blessing the candles at the beginning. Just give everyone two candles and tell them to cross them in front of their throats. He didn't think yhat would quite be liturgically correct.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We really didn't do anything out of the ordinary. We used the appointed readings and prayers for the feast - that was about it. We've never done anything candle-ish in years like this one when the Presentation happens to land on a Sunday.

      I don't think most Catholics associate the feast with Candlemas, do they? Or maybe it's not "most Catholics", it's just me. The word "Candlemas" has no resonance to me - I don't know what it is supposed to signify.

      A guest musician, who was disappointed that we weren't doing more to celebrate the day, noted that, in Europe, the Presentation is considered the end of the Christmas season. This comment was made in the context of looking at some of the music choices for yesterday, which hearkened back to the Christmas season. (So I guess the music choices were one more thing we did to mark the occasion.) I don't know to what extent that's true about Europe, but I think it can be noted (I'm borrowing from Fr. Richard Fregomeni on this) that celebrations of the Incarnation pop up throughout the liturgical year, cf. the Annunciation, the Visitation, the Birth of Mary, the Immaculate Conception. Christmas doesn't go away for long.

      Last year, we blessed throats individually at the end of every Sunday mass. But I believe the feast of St. Blase fell on the Sunday last year (or would have if the Sunday hadn't superseded it). This year, we only did a general blessing of throats at the end of mass; and it was announced that, if you wanted to have your throat blessed individually, come to daily mass today (Feb 3). One big change from last year: at this time last year our parish had two priests and three deacons; now we have one priest and two deacons. My pastor told me, before the Saturday 5 pm mass, that if he had to bless all the throats individually, he'd be there until 7. I suppose that doesn't strike a lot of folks as being a notable hardship, but I'm trying to be sympathetic to him - he is definitely picking up many things that a 2nd priest would have previously handled.

      Delete
    2. They also did blessing of throats at the school Mass on Friday. Father told people on Sunday that if they had been there on Friday, they didn't need to come up for another blessing. As he put it, "St. Blaise doesn't do booster shots."
      One of my friends was saying that when she was a kid, the candles were lit that they did the blessing with. I dunno, that sounds rather dangerous! They were always unlit in my memory.
      One of my sisters was prone to catch every bug that came around as a child. She was home sick one February 3, and said that our grandma came around and got her out of bed, saying, "You can't miss church today, you have to get your throat blessed. You need all the help you can get!" She probably spread a few germs around in the process.

      Parishioners can pick up the blessed candles in the church office if they want. We still have ours from a previous year, so I didn't. They're just paraffin anyway, not beeswax.

      Delete
    3. As for music, there was really only one song in our music edition that was specific for the Presentation, "In His Temple Now Behold Him". It was to the tune of St. Thomas, known to those of us of a certain age as Tantum Ergo.

      Delete
  5. February 2nd is also world day for consecrated religious life. We have four sisters from outside the parish who came to the Mass. They were recognized during the homily. At the preparation we sang a hymn for women religious.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If you had financial problems, then it is time for you to smile. You only need to contact Mr. Benjamin  with the amount you wish to borrow and the payment period that suits you and you will have your loan  within three working days. I just benefited for the sixth time a loan of 700 thousand dollars for a period of 180 months with the possibility of paying before the expiration date. Mr Benjamin has be helping me with loan.Make contact with him and you will see that he is a very honest man with a good heart.His email is lfdsloans@lemeridianfds.com and his WhatApp phone number is + 1-989-394-3740 

    ReplyDelete