Monday, February 10, 2020

Shaw's Joan, My Joan and Ours

 Since the rough beast’s hour has come round at last, I am  finding consolation and distraction in old enthusiasms. When I found that Holly Hill’s Playing Joan survived the Great Purge, I reread it, which led inevitably to G. B. Shaw’s play and, of course, its preface.
 One thing I concluded this time around is that the old self-proclaimed atheist was more than a little smitten with the Fifteenth Century saint. Shaw’s characters generally are projections of Shaw, but in writing the Maid’s role he yielded to his subject. He let her speak for herself; some of her best lines, worthy of Shaw, are straight out of the transcript of Joan’s heresy trial in 1431.



 Through the mouths of other characters Shaw makes Joan out to be the first Protestant and the first Nationalist. She was no Protestant. Like most atheists, Shaw didn’t know the Catholic Church teaches that  “(a) human being must always obey the certain judgment of his conscience. If he were to deliberately act against it he would condemn himself.” (CCC 11790) Joan makes exactly that argument at her trial.
  Her nationalism seems to me to be less deniable and more problematic, since its history is serial adoption by tyrants, con men and poltroons.
  Shaw is better on her voices — of St. Margaret (of Antioch) and St. Catherine (of Alexandria) and sometimes of Michael the Archangel — than most of the Joan biographers I’ve read. I almost had to admire Vita Sackville-West who, in the course of a very friendly biography, said, in effect, “I can’t make anything out of Joan’s voices,” and proceeded to write the next few hundred pages without them. That’s a little like Moby Dick without a boat. Shaw, on the other hand, said she heard voices, and so do many people in all ages. So get over it. The main test is, does the voice give sound advice? Joan’s told a 17- or maybe 19-year-old girl to lift the siege of Orleans and crown the dauphin, and she did. Q.E.D.

  Capt. ROBERT DE BAUDRICOURT:  It is the will of God that I shall send you back to your father with orders to put you under lock and key and thrash the madness out of you. What do you say to that?
 JOAN: You think you will, squire; but you will find it all coming quite different. You said you would not see me, but here I am.

  Vanessa Redgrave told Holly Hill that when she began playing Joan, she made up her own faces for the voices, but by the end of the run gargoyle-type faces had replaced them when she looked upward for them in the cathedral scene and, later, at the trial. Other actresses Hill interviewed said they had no trouble with that aspect of Joan; lots of people hear voices.
 “I came to accept the voices as fact, unquestionably, as Joan did,” said Marjorie Brewer. “Don’t misunderstand me — this was not a profound religious experience; it just was.”
 I should explain that Playing Joan consists of Hill’s (mostly) interviews with as many living actresses as she could reach who had played prominent Joans up too the mid-1980s.  Her inspiration was the realization that no one knows how the original Hamlets played the role, but there was time to get the early Joans on record. The first, Sybil Thorndyke (1924) had died, but Hill got 16 of them, including Thorndyke’s daughter, Ann Casson, and such as Jane Alexander, Judi Dench, Uta Hagen, Joan Plowright and Redgrave.
 The Joan on the cover is Siobahn McKenna, whom we had the opportunity to see in the role on our honeymoon. (Peter Falk — Colombo — made his stage debut as the English soldier.) That production had a very potent influence on my personal Catholicism for the next decade or so.
 (Siobahn had translated Shaw into Gaelic before she did the play in English. One of her former seminary students told me she taught elocution at Maynooth Seminary back in the day. When she died, he sent me clips of the funeral coverage from the Irish press; not a pub was missed from the altar to the grave.)
 The actress’ first problem is that Joan was a teenager, but  actresses of that age don’t have the technique to sustain a role that is both physically and mentally gymnastic. As Dame Judi said, “(w)hen you are Joan’s age you’re not old enough to play her, and when you are old enough to play Juliet, you are too old.”
 Siobhan noted that of all the plays about Joan of Arc, only two used “Saint Joan” in the title, and both were by atheists — Shaw and Bertolt Brecht.
  Burned by the English as a convicted heretic of the Church, Joan of Arc wound a saint of the same Church and a dream girl of atheists. Her role in theater, alone, is difficult and rewarding enough to keep her legend alive.
 The important people of this world last longer than the election cycle.

17 comments:

  1. Mark Twain, also arguably an atheist, was also smitten with Joan. "Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc" seems to be regarded now as a well-researched historical novel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here (for your enjoyment) is Shaw: "Mark Twain's Joan, skirted to the ground and with as many petticoats as Noah's wife in a toy ark, is an attempt to combine Bayard with Esther Summerson from Bleak House into an unimpeachable American schoolteacher in armor. Like Esther Summerson, she makes her creator ridiculous, yet, being a work of genius, remains a credible human goodygoody in spite of her creator's infatuation."

    I think Twain was smitten with her, too. He thought his Joan book was his best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Esther and Joan is kind of an unintuitive comparison.

      Thanks for this post. I've seen St. Joan once on the stage, in a production that, frankly, wasn't very good. That was years ago. Your post makes me want to see it again.

      Delete
  3. I haven't seen Shaw's play. But I have Richard Einhorn's composition Voices of Light, inspired by the 1928 silent film, "The Passion of Joan of Arc". The part of Joan is voiced by the female musical group, The Anonymous 4.
    I enjoyed Thomas Keneally's novel, Blood Red, Sister Rose.
    Joan of Arc was one of a long line of saints treated badly by the clergy. When she died she was under sentence of excommunication. It is interesting that her mother was instrumental in getting the excommunication lifted, 25 years after her death. She wasn't canonized until 1920 (by Pope Benedict XV). Between her death in 1431 and her canonization she was used and abused for political purposes by various factions, both civil and ecclesial.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The 1928 silent film is well worth watching. I did not care for Voices of Light. I found it somewhat relentless and overpowering. Watched the second half of the movie with the sound off. I hasten to add that in these latter years, I have ceased to find music enjoyable for the most part.

    I have never read Twain's account of Joan, but in his comments about the book my sense is that the deaths of his own children seemed to affect his view of her. Grief made him full of rage and cynicism, but he could also fall into sentimentality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My dad liked Twain's Joan. Someone gave it to him for a gift lately. I'll have to borrow it from him sometime.

      Delete
    2. I don't understand silent film enough to assess the 1928 version, although it looks as if Bishop Cauchon is the villain as usual. Shaw gave him some redeeming qualities while both Cauchon and Shaw (the Irishman) land hard on the Earl of Warwick. As Shaw saw it, the bishop wanted to saver her soul. Warwick only wanted to destroy her body.

      Delete
    3. Katherine, maybe my Lent reading theme will have to be books about Joan of Arc. She never interested me much, but there is certainly no dearth of reading material about her!

      Delete
  5. Joan also shows up in Shakespeare as a character who talks to demons (Henry VI, Part I). Everyone ignores this when making the case for Shakespeare as a crypto-Catholic, though, to be fair, Joan was a) not yet a saint and b) French.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I never had the impression that Shakespeare was very religious at all, except in a generic way.

      Delete
    2. Shakespeare's religion is the subject for an whole nother thread, but I am not going to try it. Fifteen demerits from Ignatius Press to you, though, for suggesting he wasn't Catholic.

      Shaw, of course, did have something to say about La Pucelle in Henry VII: "not more authentic than descriptions in the London papers of George Washington in the 1780, of Napoleon in in 1803, of the German crown prince in 1915 or of Lenin in 1917." He adds that Shakespeare seems to have started out to make her a "beautiful and romantic figure," but was told by his company that that would go down poorly in England, and so he ended up in "mere scurrility."

      Delete
    3. Ha, 15 demerits from from Ignatian Press is chump change compared to what I've racked up on my time in Purgatory, assuming I'm lucky enough to.end up there.

      Anyway, how does Shaw know what Shakespeare was going to do with Joan? He really was insufferable sometimes.

      Delete
    4. Shaw was insufferable, I mean. I have no idea about Shakespeare. Though maybe Shaw had some thoughts.in that, too.

      Delete
    5. One portrayal of Shakespeare, as Elizabethan superstar, from contemporary-ish Broadway: this is from "Something Rotten":
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hnI7yhIWGY

      Another cut of the Bard, from the same show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJ_PhU0vyMw

      ... and here is contemporary-ish Shaw, put through the musical filter from 60 or so years ago and revived pretty recently on (I think) the West End:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kX3PZ_ynss

      Delete
    6. My first recollection of anything Shakespeare was a production of Hamlet that was televised in the early '60s. Can't think why my parents would have been watching it, except that if you can only pick up 2 channels if the aerial is turned just right, you're pretty hard up for entertainment. Anyway the ghost of Hamlet's father was done quite impressively. He appeared glowing against the dark at the bottom of a staircase. In my mind it looked just like our basement stairs. My bedroom was in the basement, and I was afraid to go to bed. Which makes me laugh now, kids are used to way scarier material than Hamlet.

      Delete
    7. Jim, Thanks for the reefers, um, refers. Some folks did a serious shot at putting the songs from the plays, plus Venus and Adonis, to music in the Eighties. Called it Shakespeare's Cabaret. It didn't last very long, despite the presence of Catherine Cox, but I have a rehearsal tape. The closing -- Let me the cannikin clink + the text of Shakespeare's tombstone -- should have been enough to sell the show, imho. Didn't.

      About the same time there was a show being hawked by some luminaries of the British theater called "Will Power" (well, that's pretty obvious). It was a revue of Shakespearean put-ons by everybody from Monty Python to Rodgers & Hart. -- Yes, R&H had written a tune for "Oklahoma" in Shakespearean style for one-time performance for a worthy cause. It was delightful watching the leading soprano of the Scottish National Opera skipping across the stage in overalls during that number, I recall. When British money was not forthcoming, they packed up and came to New Jersey, where they did it at Mercer County Community College. The pianist for the show was London TV's equivalent to Captain Kangaroo in real life.

      Delete