Sunday, January 26, 2020

On Mike Pompeo Blowing a Gasket

By now everyone has heard about the interview with Mike Pompeo by NPR's Mary Louise Kelly.

"During a Friday interview with Pompeo on US policy toward Iran, All Things Considered host Mary Louise Kelly asked the secretary of state whether he owed an apology to Marie Yovanovitch. Yovanovitch is the former US ambassador to Ukraine who was subjected to a smear campaign led by Rudy Giuliani and was unceremoniously removed from her post in April, bringing an abrupt end to her 33-year career as a foreign service officer."

"Pompeo was not pleased with the change in topic or the question. “You know, I agreed to come on your show today to talk about Iran,” Pompeo replied. “That’s what I intend to do.”
Kelly, noting that she’d confirmed with Pompeo’s staff that Ukraine would be part of the interview, didn’t give up — and Pompeo abruptly ended the interview."
This is where, logically, the incident would have ended. Pompeo could have walked away, and nobody could have stopped him.  Instead, he chose to call the reporter into a closed door session, and told her to turn off recording.  Personally, this is where in my opinion, it would have been a good place for her to walk away, since she had gotten all she could out of him. But be that as it may, she stayed. And he proceeded to rip her a new one, in a tirade which included profanity and abusive language. And then had the nerve to claim later that this part had been "off the record", and that it was a betrayal of professional ethics for her to talk about it. Whatever.
Washington Post called it classic gaslighting. Pompeo then recounted a somewhat bizarre request that he made of her, to identify Ukraine on a map (apparently not labeled?). He claimed that she misidentified it by a distance of 3000 miles, pointing to Bangladesh  instead. Which was unlikely, considering that she held a master's degree in European studies from Cambridge University.
So what is the meaning of this incident, other than that Mike Pompeo behaved like a jerk?

From the Vox article cited above:

"This isn’t the first time Pompeo has lashed out at those asking him tough questions. He’s demeaned a reporter’s question about North Korea’s nuclear capabilities as “insulting,” has taken Fox News’ Chris Wallace to task for asking questions that he characterized as almost “ridiculous,” and has even attacked members of Congress, like when he angrily lectured Sen. Tom Udall over a question about Trump’s foreign business interests.  But Pompeo’s fury this time seems directly related to the growing controversy around the treatment of Yovanovitch." 
"...In November, Yovanovitch testified under oath in the House impeachment inquiry that his comments “sounded like a threat.”
"Since then, new evidence has emerged suggesting that associates of Rudy Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer, had Yovanovitch under surveillance in Ukraine."
"...Additionally, on Friday, ABC News reported on the existence of a tape of the president ordering Yovanovitch’s firing. A voice that sounds like the president’s can be heard demanding that an aide “Get rid of her! Get her out tomorrow ... Take her out.”
Following the release of Parnas’s WhatsApp messages by the House Intelligence Committee as part of a larger documents trove last week, Ukraine announced that it had opened a criminal investigation into the purported surveillance of Yovanovitch.
"...In the same interview, Pompeo conceded that it was his “obligation as secretary of state” to open an investigation into claims that Yovanovitch had been surveilled.
"However, he failed to offer any defense of Yovanovitch, a veteran of the State Department who has served under both Republican and Democratic administrations."
So my take is that Pompeo is feeling a bit embarrassed over his failure to support Yovanovich (but not enough to have done anything about it). And is also pretty nervous about the rocks being overturned in the impeachment proceedings. And that he needs to take Anger Management 101.

15 comments:

  1. I don't think Pompeo is the type who feels embarrassed. He is helping Jesus bring about the apocalypse, after all, along with God's anointed Donald J. Trump. Pompeo is also a very out-of-shape man under tremendous duress of his own making, and he can't lash out at Mr. President. Women and dogs are always handy when you need to relieve tension by beating the sh*t out of someone.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Some senators have defended Kelly. According to WBUR:

    Five Democratic members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee — ranking member Bob Menendez of New Jersey; Cory Booker, also of New Jersey; Ed Markey of Massachusetts; Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Tim Kaine of Virginia — responded caustically on Saturday to Pompeo's statement.

    "We write to express our profound disappointment and concern regarding your irresponsible statement this morning about NPR Reporter Mary Louise Kelly and the corrosive effects of your behavior on American values and standing in the world," the senators wrote in a letter to Pompeo. "At a time when journalists around the world are being jailed for their reporting — and as in the case of Jamal Khashoggi, killed — your insulting and contemptuous comments are beneath the office of the Secretary of State."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Who ever expected professionalism from a Trump adminisration? Who ever expected class after watching the escalator-ride announcement?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm sure the administration is very frustrated that nobody is getting the message. You know, the one where Gordon Sondland is quoted as saying, "Trump doesn't give a sh*t about Ukraine." Repeat, nothing to see here, folks. Move along. We're not going to talk about Ukraine.
    And then a pesky reporter has the audacity to bring up...Ukraine.
    Another chicken came home to roost this weekend, in the form of John Bolton's upcoming book.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Washington Post has a follow-up with the e-mails exchanged between Martin, Pomepeo's aid and Kelly:

    “Just wanted to touch base that we still intend to keep the interview to Iran tomorrow,” Martin wrote. “Know you just got back from Tehran so we would like to stick to Iran as the topic as opposed to jumping around. Is that something we can agree to?”

    Kelly responded, “I am indeed just back from Tehran and plan to start there. Also Ukraine. And who knows what the news gods will serve up overnight. I never agree to take anything off the table.”

    Naturally Trump has attacked NPR, etc.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/emails-support-npr-host-after-pompeo-calls-her-a-liar-in-setting-up-contentious-interview/2020/01/26/d793cf0e-4071-11ea-b503-2b077c436617_story.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. What with the Bolton leak and the Pompeo tantrum discussion, I am thinking that the Administration is collapsing from within. That insiders who kept their opinions to themselves have had enough. Any other examples.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Romney is saying, "Let's hear Bolton", also that he thinks there are enough votes to go ahead with that.
      I read one comment saying that even if they can't subpoena Bolton, they could subpoena a copy of his book. Don't know if that is true or not.

      Delete
    2. Thinking of the book publisher's dilemma.. Great publicity for the book! But what if everything is splashed out before it is released.
      Also have thought about Bolton's dilemma: If the book doesn't come out before the end of the trial and he goes on to collect his million when it is published, will people accuse him of making money over a national crisis?

      Delete
    3. According to the Times, the book had to be submitted to the White House for clearance last December, to make sure it doesn't contain classified information. One version of the NYT story implied that the White House could take its time "clearing" the book. It might take until, say, late 2024 before it can come out.

      Didja know Bolton has the same scummy, crumby agent Comey has? So say Trump's Tweetpartners. Birds of a feather. The other thing they have in common is, of course, Trump as their ex-boss. Maybe that has occurred to Pompeo and he is sorry he took himself out of the Kansas Senate race. Well, as a consolation, Mike, there is that book agent.

      There is no reason why everyone at Fox should be making money on books defending Trump (and, as far as I can tell, nearly everyone there is) but Bolton can't make money with stuff he didn't make up.

      Delete
    4. I see that Bolton has written two other books: "Surrender Is Not An Option", and (take a deep breath before you read the full title of the next one) "How Barack Obama is Endangering Our National Sovereignty: How Global Warming Hysteria Leads to Bad Science, Pandering Politicians, and Misguided Policies".
      The Dems should keep in mind that the enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend.

      Delete
    5. Katherine right you are: What if Bolton has some deep state stuff and the Bidens?!

      Delete
    6. Not currently watching the Republican riposte on TV, taping for quick look later. Have they made any reference to the Bolton frage today?

      Delete
  7. Jennifer Rubin seems to think Republicans are cornered and the jig is up:

    "Senate Republicans can call Bolton, hear his damning testimony and suffer the president’s rage. Alternatively, they can refuse to consider the most dispositive evidence imaginable, confirm this is a sham trial (denying Trump exoneration) and then watch as Bolton humiliates them by revealing the evidence they willfully ignored. Either way, the incriminating evidence against Trump will come out. The only question is if they want to be seen as accomplices in a failed coverup scheme."

    What forgets is the infinite ability of Trumpers to simply say Bolton is a disgruntled employee lying to get back at the Prez.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I predict they'll go with your option 2, and also the disgruntled employee bit.

      Delete