Wednesday, November 6, 2019

Racism today

For the last few days, the Chicago area has been jarred by a racist incident at a Buffalo Wild Wings restaurant in suburban Naperville, IL.

Here is NBC News's summary of the incident (not surprisingly, the story is now going national):
Buffalo Wild Wings has fired two employees after a family of mostly black people was told to move tables because a white couple didn’t want to sit next to them.
Mary Vahl went to the Buffalo Wild Wings in Naperville, Illinois, outside Chicago, on Oct. 26 with a party of 18, which she described as “a group of minorities, mostly consisting of African Americans” in a Facebook post that has gone viral.As the host was setting up their table, Vahl says they were told a regular customer at a table of two said he didn’t want to be seated next to them because of their race. Vahl and her party sat there anyway.
“We don’t give him the satisfaction and told the host we’ll sit where they set us up,” she wrote on Facebook.
After ordering a few things, Vahl and her party were told they had to switch tables, but they refused, she detailed on Facebook.
After management made “excuses” for why they had to switch tables, Vahl and her party eventually left, and went to Hooters instead, appalled by the way they were treated at the wings chain. 
I suppose there is no need for me to explain how outrageous this incident is, nor to register here my own disgust that anyone can be treated this way, anywhere.  Frankly, as a resident of the Chicago area, I'm embarrassed.  We should be better than this.

When I heard the report, my initial reaction was, "That sounds too bad to be true."  I had a similar instinct when the initial reports of Jussie Smollett's now-discredited claim of being attacked by two white men wearing MAGA hats first hit the airwaves.  It was all too pat to be true - it sounded more like a caricature than something that really happened.  But in this case, nobody, including Buffalo Wild Wings, is denying that the Naperville incident happened as reported.

I suppose there are two levels of issues.  One is the difficult-to-fathom insensitivity and, I am guessing, cowardice of the Buffalo Wild Wings employees who, rather than confronting a racist in the full ugly manifestation of his racism, instead deferred to his wishes.  Maybe they thought asking the African American party to move would minimize the chances of causing a scene and disrupting other diners.

But at the root of it is the racist himself.  I suppose he didn't break any laws.  But that sort of public evil needs to be faced, and it needs to be named.

Naperville is the largest of Chicago's suburbs, but it's not especially diverse.  About three quarters of its residents are white.  Its median family income is about $130K, which means it is, on the whole, pretty affluent. It's an education center, with seven college and university campuses, and it's the center b of Illinois' high-tech corridor.  Its Congressional representative, Bill Foster, is a Democrat from the technocratic mold (he's a metrics and statistics wizard, which provided his entree into politics).  I don't claim to be intimately familiar with the town, but I don't think of it as a hotbed of racism - certainly not the overt ugliness on display in this incident.  Let's hope that this racist patron, whoever he is, is an anomaly for the Chicago area.

11 comments:

  1. Jim, do you feel that this incident would have been less likely to happen 5-10 years ago? It seem like race relations have gone backwards lately in some ways.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Katherine - 5-10 years ago, I was a good deal more naive about the persistence of racism than I am today. I wouldn't have predicted it in Naperville, where adults tend to have been to college, and even the high school students come across as polished and articulate, and everyone seems pretty neighborly. Naperville is sort of the quintessence of the Blue-trending suburbs that resulted in Republicans getting shellacked in yesterday's elections in Kentucky and Virginia. Suburbia may not measure up to progressives' exacting standards of wokeness, but they're more tolerant than they were a generation ago. Or so it seems to me.

      You may well be right in what I think you're implying: that Donald Trump's electoral success in 2016 has, in a sense, given people permission to pull their racist proclivities out of mothballs and hang them out for public display.

      Delete
    2. "...what I think you're implying: that Donald Trump's electoral success in 2016 has, in a sense, given people permission to pull their racist proclivities out of mothballs and hang them out for public display."
      Jim, yes, that is part of what I am implying. But also implying more than that. 5-10 years ago Trump wasn't president. Barack Obama was. At that point some people went bonkers. Trump's election was the direct result of how bonkers they were (and are). Otherwise the Republican candidate would have been one of the 17 or so other candidates who weren't rabble rousers and demagogues.
      I feel that our primary system contributed to the degree of dysfunction we find ourselves in. There's something to be said for smoke-filled rooms.

      Delete
    3. Katherine - yes, I agree at least partly. There is no doubt that one component of the coalition Trump cobbled together is the white nationalist/racist fringe, and I do think we can draw a straight, racist line from Obama to Trump among that group.

      I think his core, though, is just seething with resentment that is larger than racism. Part of it is resentment toward Hispanics and anyone else not perceived as like them (being white being an important constituent part of "like them"). But it's also resentment toward the people on the other side of the education/income chasm, who dictate the cultural norms and control the economy. Those people (like me, I guess) are the ones who ship the jobs overseas, impose political correctness, neglect small towns, etc. etc. These are the people for whom Mitt Romney, the polished, suit-and-tied investment banker, was absolutely the wrong candidate; but Donald Trump, the from-the-gut guy they'd admired from television, tapped into their reservoir of resentment.

      Delete
    4. Jim I agree that it was more than racism. It was people who felt disempowered (whether they actually were or not).

      Delete
  2. I wonder what the age of the racist is. Hopefully, 95.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The local television reports show a picture of him from the back, maybe snapped by one of the partygoers who was asked to leave. He looks like a big, burly youngish-to-middle-age man. He is bald; when I see him from the back in that picture, I think "skinhead". Just looking at him, I think it's possible that he intimidated the restaurant workers. That's all speculation on my part, though.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, Jim, I found it on YouTube. Looks like 30s to 40s. Guess the KKK cross-burning torch was passed to a new generation.

      Delete
  3. Naperville is twice the size of Evanston!? I've got to get out more. The Naperville I remember was the real boonies.

    This story did sound like a throwback. If you Google "hate crimes Trump," you will find a ton of articles relating increases in hate crimes to the election of Trump. And it makes sense in that his dog whistles embolden the attack dogs to say what the leftwing socialist liberal Democrat lamestream media won't print if he says it. It makes sense, but I still question the methodology of about half of those stories. I did read one yesterday -- which I can't find today -- that examined 800 hate crimes in which the phrase "go back to..." was spoken, and the president's authority for saying it was invoked in 20 percent of them.

    There is a lot of free-floating hate out there that seems to have located a designated enemy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tom, that is an interesting insight about free-floating hate. My initial reaction is: then we need to keep preaching love. And witnessing to love. And modeling love. And loving.

      Delete
    2. Re: Naperville: yeah, a lot of the people, and jobs, that would have been in Chicago a couple of generations ago, have moved out to suburbia, and quite a bit of it went west to DuPage County. I understand that some demographers group Naperville, Aurora, Wheaton and other western suburbs/exurbs (yes, Aurora is now a suburb, sort of) into its own metropolitan area that has a population of a couple million.

      Delete