Sunday, August 11, 2019

Is that smell burning flesh?

 A clown tweeted an out-of-thin-air suggestion that Bill and Hillary Clinton were behind the death of  Jeffrey Epstein. The President of the Unites States retweeted it here and also here.
  In short, the President of he United States has accused leading members of the opposition party of murder. From The New York Times:
 
 Hours after Mr. Epstein was found to have hanged himself in his Manhattan jail cell, Mr. Trump retweeted a post from the comedian Terrence Williams linking the Clintons to the death. Mr. Epstein “had information on Bill Clinton & now he’s dead,” wrote Mr. Williams, a Trump supporter. In an accompanying two-minute video, Mr. Williams noted that “for some odd reason, people that have information on the Clintons end up dead.”
 There is no evidence to substantiate the claim, which derives from groundless speculation on the far right, dating to Mr. Clinton’s early days as president, that multiple deaths can be traced to the Clintons and explained by their supposed efforts to cover up wrongdoing.
 This is not funny. This is also beyond traditional Trump. I know: He told the Boy Scouts "man to man" to get rich so they could get laid, and hardly anyone got excited. So far, this retweet seems to be getting the" ho-hum, there he goes again" reaction all the rest of it does. But this is different.
 He is talking the way Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela was talking about his rival, Juan Guaido, when Vice President Pence, John Bolton and Mike Pompeo and the whole State Department went stark, raving bananas and threatened war. Historically, talk like this leads to action, and action leads to loss of life and liberty. It isn't enough to say Kim Jung Trump is "like that." He has never been this much "like that," and others who are like that have caused pain and suffering to their own people and others.
 Trump just dodged a bullet himself, since if Epstein had gone to trial he would have been asked every day if a presidential pardon was on offer.  (My gosh! The neighbors we have down here!)  And he, unlike Clinton, used to give Epstein rave character reviews.
 The proverbial frog never noticed the heat being turned up under the pot, and that is why he became frog legs.






15 comments:

  1. Trump was buddies with Epstein, so he's deflecting that by dredging up old conspiracies to remind everyone that Bill Clinton was also Epstein's buddy. Got an inconvenient suicide? CROOKED HILLATY AND EVIL BILL DONE IT!

    What do you propose we do? GOP operatives presumably know the president far better than we do, and they want to keep fanning the air and saying they don't smell sh*t.

    Democrats don't have the votes to get rid of him.

    His cabinet doesn't seem inclined to use Section 4 of the 25th Amendment. Plus many of them are "acting secretaries," and I don't know if their votes would be binding if the cabinet DID decide to use it. Sounds like a way to at least keep a Section 4 action tied up in court.

    We certainly have elected ourselves a rootin' tootin' evil bastard, but I weary of the "ain't it awful" chorus.

    If you have suggestions for how to help fix this, please let me know. Otherwise, I am going back to raising hell with my elected reps about Medicare and climate change.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Impeachment would be the obvious recourse. Put it on McConnell and Co. to defend the president.

      Delete
    2. There are times when I think McConnell is a worse problem than the president.

      Delete
    3. A friend who voted for Trump lamented that "if they'd just take away his phone so he couldn't tweet ..." Apparently many Republicans believe that the president is merely a rambunctious boy, his tweets on par with telling fart jokes at the table, something to chuckle about later.

      Judging from the way the rest of the Party for the Advancement of White Men and Their Money have conducted themselves in Senate hearings, I'd say that the president has many enthusiastic, loud, and often angry supporters who won't have any problem defending him.

      Failure to remove him from office would be construed, as is clear from the Mueller episode, total innocence and exoneration. And a free pass to do even crazier and crueler things.

      Jeff Flake was on the radio the other day insisting that the GOP needed to expand the diversity of the party to appeal to more Americans. But who needs people when you have money to buy power and influence?

      Delete
    4. I was out to my hometown this weekend this weekend for my 50 year class reunion (more about that later). I noticed on the trip coming back that someone had hung a big red, white, and blue "Trump in 2020" banner on an interstate overpass. Going to be a long year.

      Delete
  2. Impeach Trump and you'll end up with Sr. Mary Pence. Now do you REALLY want that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mike the Impeccable would be better than Trump. Big Bird would be better than Trump. Neither of them is stark, raving bonkers, no matter what other drawbacks they have. Sanctimony and non-existence are both better than Dunning-Krueger syndrome.

      Delete
    2. I think impeachment would be a warning to Sr. Mary Mike. The man might, at least, take advice from someone besides Javanka.

      Delete
    3. I think Pence is as dangerous as, if not moreso, than the Asshat in Chief. Pence actually has a brain, but it is focused on far-right biases and prejudices. He is very anti-LGBT+ as anyone who has resided in Indiana knows. What saved his bacon was that, as VPOTUS, he was rescued from having to run as re-election as Governor.

      Delete
  3. Notice that this story has driven gun control to the back pages, if there. No conspiracy theory...just a reflection that the attention span of our top-notch media has been reduce to a nano-hour.

    Also not a conspiracy: but it crossed my mind that if Epstein were Japanese, and had drawn and quartered himself in Japan, that might have served to provide an end that really ended the story and provided the gloss of an honorable resolution. Not that he was honorable, but that he understood how reprehensible his crimes were.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Makes me think of the book "Shogun". People were always committing sepuku to reclaim their honor. In the Christian tradition, there is no such thing as an honor suicide. I'm assuming it would be the same in Judaism also.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As applying to Judaism, there is Masada. I'd argue that it was something bigger than suicide, but it could be seen that way.

      Delete
    2. I think of Masada as more akin to martyrdom. Is that apt?

      I don't think of martyrdom as being akin to suicide.

      Delete
    3. Jim, Most accounts I've read say the folks in the citadel killed themselves or were willingly killed by others. Technically, that's suicide. But considering that the Romans were coming up the walls, I think the comparison would be to martyrs who guided their killer's hands or, like Deacon Lawence, provided cooking instructions.

      Delete