Tuesday, May 7, 2019

How to keep President Trump in office

CNN is reporting that a large group of former Justice Department officials - essentially, former federal prosecutors - have signed an open letter which offers the opinion that the obstruction of justice findings in the Mueller Report would be prosecutable, if the president was a private citizen.

"We believe strongly that, but for the OLC memo, the overwhelming weight of professional judgment would come down in favor of prosecution for the conduct outlined in the Mueller Report," the letter read.
The "OLC memo" is a legal opinion from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel which outlines the Department's current policy regarding charging a sitting president with crimes.  The essence of that opinion, as I understand it (and I am not an attorney) is that a sitting president is immune from being prosecuted for the commission of various crimes.  An average private citizen like me would not enjoy that same immunity.

That memo would seem to be the kevlar that is repelling the political bullets being fired by the president's enemies.  It also provides President Trump with a compelling reason to run for re-election.

I've written before about this logic: let's assume, for the sake of conversation, that the president has committed crimes for which he would be liable, as a private citizen, for prosecution.  In that case, he has an overwhelming motive to cling to the presidency for as long as he possibly can.  And by implication, the best way to loosen his grip on the office is to give him to understand that there is no criminal prosecution risk to his leaving the Oval Office. 

Of all the ways that the president can become an ex-president, the two that, in my view, are least worth considering, at least through 2020, are impeachment and so-called "25th amendment remedies".  The latter hypothesizes that the president somehow be declared mentally unfit for the office.  There are many things that the president has done that I find not only objectionable but irrational (cf his plans to ramp up the trade war with China), but I can't in good conscience consider him to be so acutely mentally ill that he's not capable of being president.  I don't think he's crazier than the average citizen.

As for impeachment, I haven't seen any indication that the Republican-controlled Senate would convict.  A devastating Mueller Report might have changed that dynamic, but the Mueller Report didn't deliver those goods.  As things stand now, impeachment is a non-starter, unless/until Democrats can take control of the Senate, which couldn't happen until after the 2020 elections - at which time Trump may not be in the White House anymore (and even if he wins re-election while Democrats keep control of the House and take control of the Senate, conviction may not be a sure thing).

To be sure, pursuing even a futile impeachment effort now may motivate the Democratic base pointing toward the 2020 elections, so there may be an indirect political payoff - and in fact that seems to be the calculus of many Democrats in the House.  But it would also motivate Trump's base (in the opposite direction), which presumably would attenuate if not completely offset that Democratic advantage.  But for the short term, it seems certain that impeachment will not remove the president from the White House.

Another way for the president to step down would be for him to choose not to run for re-election.  I have to think that it's almost as aggravating for him to be president as it is for the rest of us to have him as president.  If various reports are to be believed, he didn't particularly wish to be president in the first place, and was as surprised as the country as a whole when the election returns poured in on that night in November 2016.  But with an ego like his, it's difficult to imagine him voluntarily choosing not to run again - even if he didn't have this threat of criminal prosecution hanging over his head.

Yet another way would be for the president to resign prior to the next election.  I've thought for some time that a bargain could be worked out between the president and the vice president: I'll resign if you promise to pardon me.  In some ways, that probably would be best for the country and the world (and perhaps the party, although the history with President Nixon leaves that open to question), because it is the most plausible way (short of death) for the president to leave office as soon as possible.  But the prime time for that would have been a 6-12 months ago, when 2020 candidates needed to start raising money.  And it isn't really in the president's character to retreat.

As mentioned above, it's possible that the president could die in office - not that any of us would actually hope for such a thing.  The president would be 74 in 2020, and 78 - the expected lifespan for American males - in 2024.  His health seems reasonably good.  Let's conclude that his death in office is not something to expect.

Finally, he could lose the 2020 election.  That seems, by far, the most plausible way for President Trump to become a former president.  I understand he does have one primary opponent, William Weld, the former governor of Massachusetts.  Weld will not take the GOP's nomination from Trump.  Against whom will Trump run in the 2020 general election?  Polls today suggest that the Democratic nomination is Joe Biden's to lose - although it is still very early, and Biden does not have a great track record in previous runs for the presidency.  Trump could beat Biden, just as he could beat Hillary Clinton.  The odds are against that happening, but it's not impossible.  I don't sense a lot of ardor for Biden - although, as mentioned, it's early.

For Democrats and others who genuinely believe that Trump should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice, beating Trump in 2020 would seem to be the best outcome.  A Democratic president, with a Democratic Attorney General or acting Attorney General leading the Justice Department, could go after Citizen Trump with little or no political backlash.  It seems that the key to this scenario is selecting a Democratic nominee who can beat President Trump in 2020.  It will be interesting to see what develops.

22 comments:

  1. I believe Maryland governor Larry Hogan has also stated his intention to primary Trump. John Kasich is also making noises about doing so. I agree that none of them are going
    to take the nomination from him. But they can erode and weaken his support. History suggests that this is a likely effect. So I say, bring it on, the more the merrier.
    Not so sure that Biden would lose to Trump. But as Pelosi said, the victory really needs to be decisive.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This appeared this morning on my Facebook feed:
    "I always thought Donald Trump defeating Hillary Clinton was Divine intervention... But now that we know Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton, the media, Obama Admin, FBI, DOF, CIA, State Department, UK Intel, Ukraine etc., There is NO doubt it was Divine intervention.
    Thank God!"
    Obviously they live in an alternative universe, and are swallowing a 'bot meme whole. But it points up the problem the Dems have, defeating someone that his most ardent followers think is the anointed of God. And who they credit with (and applaud) countering our government's agencies.
    The Dems will never have anyone who attracts that fanatic loyalty. And that's a good thing. But that is what they're up against.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If Trump won because of divine intervention, I guess we're being punished. In that case, mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

      Delete
  3. "I don't think he's crazier than the average citizen."

    That is a sad commentary on our citizenry.

    I'm of several minds about removing Trump from office. Today I think there's a case to be made that, when Congress is wholly unable to turn to the nation's pressing problems because it is distracted by what it perceives to be wing nut and ethically marginal behavior, it probably ought to pursue what's bugging it to maintain balance of powers.

    But today is only Tuesday, and tomorrow I might be sending emails to my representatives telling them to fix immigration and the roads.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really do think that everybody is mentally ill to some extent or another (or maybe I should say "extents" - probably most of us have more than one malady), but for many of us it's not severe enough to take us outside of the limits of social acceptability (usually).

      In Trump's case, I'm not sure what his diagnosis would be. He has a raging ego, shows poor judgment, has no moral compass and and in general is not presidential timber, but none of that seems to add up to "incapacity" as envisioned by the framers of the 25th amendment.

      Delete
    2. Jim: In the fall of 2015, when so many started supporting Trump, I was horrified. The more I read about what he was saying and doing, the more concerned I got. After a while, I began to think that those calling him a clinical narcissist were probably right. So Ilooked up the official definition of narcissistic personality disorder. He is a perfect fit.

      See the Mayo Clinic information

      https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20366662

      Delete
    3. Well, I'll take an armchair pop psychology stab at him having narcissistic personality disorder. And if you want a second opinion I'll say borderline personality disorder. But I'm like you, it doesn't add up to "incapacity", at least not enough to invoke the 25th. Besides, aren't all politicians narcissists to a degree, by definition?

      Delete
    4. Sorry, Anne. I hit "publish" before I saw your reply. I agree with you.

      Delete
    5. Anne - yes, there is not much doubt about Trump having narcissistic personality disorder. I happened to be familiar with those symptoms because I looked into them when the Jussie Smollett affair was popping (I think Smollett suffers from the same malady, although their personalities are not identical).

      I am not sure where to go with that diagnosis, though. I don't think that, by itself, it disqualifies him from exercising the office. It would be nice if he got therapy.

      Delete
    6. "It would be nice if he got therapy." There was an old movie "The President's Analyst". I don't remember much about it, just that the analyst became a little bonkers himself listening to the president's problems. Would be like being the president's confessor.

      Delete
  4. Hopefully the Democrats will put forward a forward looking program and forward looking candidates rather than just respond to Trump. However if their solution in 2020 is to return to the Obama administration via Biden, they will be no more successful than their even worse attempt to turn the clock back to the Clinton administration.

    While Democrats focusing on Trump may not work, Trump could be vulnerable to a grass roots movement to "Lock HIM up." Most people might decide that it would be poetic justice. Most people do not think the presidents are above the law; quite a few people must be getting fed up with his dominance of the media. Maybe combine it with the chant "Fire Trump." He might be very vulnerable to his own tactics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Democracy requires a sane and informed electorate. If we're all nuts, we should just choose an emperor or benevolent dictator.

      Delete
    2. Has there ever been a benevolent dictator? I guess they can be benevolent as long as you don't end up on the fecal roster.

      Delete
  5. So now he has ordered McGahn not to comply with the House subpoena. At some point they will have to deal with the continual stonewalling. I didn't know you could ignore subpoenas without consequences.

    ReplyDelete
  6. He retweeted a Jerry Falwell Jr. tweet saying he should be awarded two more years to make up for the two years he lost while the Russian hoax was biting him on his ample rear. Yeah, he couldn't tank the Paris Accords, start a trade war with China, separate parents from their children and bring Obamacare to the brink of extinction because he was being pestered by the Russian hoax. Nor did the Russian hoax give him time to do anything to stop the Russians from helping again in 2020 -- as the Mueller report (not that anyone would know it) says they did in 2016.

    The only thing to stop him -- now that he has virtually prorogued Congress -- from awarding himself two more years before running for four more would be the U.S. military.

    And I, for one, would not count on that.

    Yes, he is a classic case of narcissistic personality disorder. But, as I have said before, he is an American type. For a full definition of that type, see Vito Corleone in Dr. Mario Puzo's brilliant monograph. If you think that is going too far, consider this: Tiger Woods is designing a golf course for the Don. The Don awarded Tiger Woods a Medal of Freedom (usually given to freedom fighters, but if you have ever been in the rough at PGA National, you know that freeing your ball is a challenge). How much did the Don get Tiger to knock off his fee for that misuse of a national symbol?

    And why has no one asked?



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good question!

      President Obama handed out Medals of Freedom about as often as White House mints. Everybody from Pope St. John 23 (Lyndon Johnson) to Strom Thurmond (George Bush I) has one. But the list of recipients is interesting. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidential_Medal_of_Freedom_recipients

      Delete
    2. What did Pope John do for LBJ? Loser!

      Delete
    3. LBJ also did one for Reinhold Niehbur. He honored the list JFK had made before his assasination, so don't know if those honorees were Kennedy "leftovers" or if LBJ was trolling for Catholic votes with Pope John and reassuring Protestants with Niebhur, or what. Would be an interesting story.

      Delete
  7. While we're on the subject of Trump, the NYT has validated what all of us who can spot a flim flam bamboozler knew deep in our heart of hearts. The great Oracle of business lost over $1B in a decade in the 80's and 90's. If his recent tax returns were brought to light, I'm sure it'd show no improvement in his business acumen. This guy is a hologram of a hologram.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't quite believe he lost all that money. I have a suspicion that he made it disappear somewhere to avoid paying taxes on it.

      Delete
    2. Katherine, in my mind, anybody who can make a casino fail can fail at anything. I have a suspicion that his real success in business is in international money laundering. When you're as bad in legitimate business as he is, you have to switch to what works.

      Delete
    3. I think you are right. When you look at the unoccupied rate of owned units in Trump condos, you have to suspect they are being used as safety deposit boxes, not for sleeping. Charles Morris had a piece in Commonweal a couple of years ago about the floors and floors of New York that are owned but unoccupied. I check the balconies of some of our pricier condos in season and out, and there is not even a cactus plant, much less a human being, on most of them.

      Delete