In the real, unadulterated depiction of the Blessed Mother on
the Guadalupe tilma, she is about eight-and-a-half months pregnant. That’s
right, since her liturgical due date was about two weeks after her image
appeared on St. Juan Diego’s cloak in 1531.
You don’t see
many images of Mary in which she is pregnant. She was, you know. It’s in Luke.
But when she appears in approved statues and paintings, her appearance more
often implies the virginal and leaves out maternity. Additionally, when I see
them I think of the greeting that drives my Jewish friends up a wall: “But you
don’t look
Jewish.” Well, she wouldn’t if the model was a Renaissance painter’s
mistress, which so many of the models were, would she?
In many
unauthorized copies of the Guadalupe tilma, she gets Nordic coloring. They also
lift her head as if the humble tilt she showed to Juan Diego ill-befits a queen
of heaven, who should look like Wonder Woman when she is eclipsing – as she is
on the tilma – the sun god.
But that is
not how she presented herself.
What is on Juan
Diego’s cloak is not a painting. The tilma is made from fiber that lasts no
more than 20 years when artists try to copy the image on the identical kind of
material and make what one enthusiastic Milwaukeean called a “genuine replica.”
The tilma is going on 500 years. Lots of other things about it aren’t explained
either.
I have never
seen a picture of Mary up to her elbows in dough with a rolling pin in her
hands. The title would be Mary, Maker of Bread, and that’s symbolism that just
wouldn’t quit. It would probably give the vapors to the keepers of that
distinctly Catholic idea that Mary was a virgin mother without ever being
pregnant or breaking a sweat. (I also don’t believe that a Jewish mother undergoing
what she went through was meek and mild as a dove.)
I don’t think
the standard, authorized Catholic image of Mary is very biblical or true to
life. More importantly, we have the evidence of the tilma that neither does its
subject.
Update: I had an October date on top. Maybe confusingnmy birthday month with the one we are in. Or maybe just another senior moment. Anyway Deacon Jim gets credit for me getting the headline right.
Second update: A nice piece on interpreting Our Lady of Guadalupe,by Timothy Matovina, popped up on the Commonweal Website: https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/edges-empire
Update: I had an October date on top. Maybe confusingnmy birthday month with the one we are in. Or maybe just another senior moment. Anyway Deacon Jim gets credit for me getting the headline right.
Second update: A nice piece on interpreting Our Lady of Guadalupe,by Timothy Matovina, popped up on the Commonweal Website: https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/edges-empire
