I thought this article in NCR was interesting, especially since I lived through the liturgical reforms of Vatican II:
The impetus for liturgical reform and more participation of the laity was already happening well before Vatican II. During the later 1950s, and 1960s, when I attended grade school, the nuns who taught us were already implementing the "Dialogue Mass", in which the students learned and recited the responses said by the servers. The responses were still in Latin, and the students had the English and Latin daily missals to follow. Of course this wouldn't have happened without the consent of the pastor.
There were even places where the priest said Mass facing the people, though I think this was "ex officio" not formally permitted yet.
One thing that was very noticeable with the changes of Vatican II was a greater emphasis on the Scriptures, with the three year cycle which we observe now. Before that, it was a one year cycle, with more repetition of readings, and fewer Old Testament readings.
Of course it was a learning curve, and some people didn't like the changes at first. But it seemed like people got used to it, and the vernacular liturgy was well received. But not everybody was on board, including now some younger people who would have had no memory of the "before times".
From the NCR article:
"After months of poring through the major documents of the Second Vatican Council, Pope Leo XIV said the council's reform of the liturgy.... was "necessary" for the faithful to more fully participate in the celebration of Mass."
"Addressing the attendees of his weekly general audience hosted inside St. Peter's Basilica Aug. 26, Leo expounded on the motivations for the liturgical reform issued in Sancrosanctum Concilium, the council's constitution on the liturgy that opened the way for the Mass to be celebrated in the vernacular and to alter elements of the Latin-rite liturgy. "
"Drawing from the council's teaching on the liturgy and the writings of Pope Paul VI when he was archbishop of Milan, Leo recalled that the council's concern for the faithful attending Mass as "silent spectators" expressed a "renewed awareness of the value of the liturgy."
"The participation of the faithful cannot be passive," he said. "From this conviction arose the need to make the richness of the biblical texts and prayers more accessible to all the faithful, and to streamline the order of the celebration compared with that set out in the liturgical books then in use."
"The council's liturgical reform has remained a source of debate in the church since its promulgation in 1963 and it reached a fever pitch in 2021, when Pope Francis tightened restrictions on celebrating the pre-Vatican II Latin Mass. His predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, had previously loosened the restrictions. "
"The issue was thrust back into the public spotlight this summer when the clergy of the ultraconservative Society of St. Pius X, which has called the reformed liturgy "evil" and lacking in the spiritual value necessary for the faithful, were excommunicated in the Catholic Church's most significant schism in recent memory. "
"Several prominent prelates capitalized on that moment to call for greater access to celebrate the pre-Vatican Latin Mass. "
"Despite those appeals, the head of the Vatican's liturgy office has stated that the pope will not repeal Francis' 2021 restrictions and wrote in a document to cardinals that the reformed liturgy ought to be the sole form of the Mass in the Latin rite....the pope also maintained that the council's liturgical reform is "firmly rooted in the living tradition of the church."
"Indeed, since the liturgy is a living entity, throughout the centuries it has always been subject to developments and changes," he said. "The magisterium adapted its forms to the needs of different eras. It is therefore not surprising that the Second Vatican Council too, with the utmost respect for the heritage of tradition, and precisely in order to make it more accessible, considered it necessary to revise the liturgical books."
"In January, Leo chose the documents of the Second Vatican Council as the theme for his first catechesis series as pope, stating that the faithful had to familiarize themselves with the council's teaching to "continue to seek ways and means to implement its insights."
I should add that another bone of contention with the traditionalists is the way of receiving Communion. Of course now the standard practice is to go up standing, and to receive either on the hands or on the tongue. The priest, deacon or EMHC says "the Body of Christ" and the response is "Amen". Formerly it was to receive kneeling at the Communion rail. The priest said " Corpus Domini nostri Jesu Christi custodiat animam tuam in vitam aeternam. Amen". Which is translated, "May the Body of our Lord Jesus Christ preserve your soul unto life everlasting." The communicant didn't say anything. It was a beautiful prayer, and was arguably more reverent. Except that it was said very fast and most people didn't know what was being said.
ReplyDelete