In my view, there are many things to criticize in Archbishop Chaput's First Things article entitled The Pope and Other Religions. However, I am not sure the point that most interested me has much to do with the remarks made by the pope and criticized by Chaput. In any case, here's my observation. Archbishop Chaput says
To borrow a thought from C. S. Lewis, if Jesus were just one among many, he’d also be a liar, because he emphatically claimed that, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). A loving God may accept the worship of any sincere and charitable heart—but salvation comes only through his only son, Jesus Christ.
Of course he is alluding to Lewis's trilemma (Jesus is "lunatic, liar, or Lord"), an old bit of apologetics. Much as admire C. S. Lewis, it's one of his lesser contributions to Christianity. And it is odd to see a noted archbishop relying on apologetics in attempting to correct the pope.
The problem that both Lewis and the archbishop have, and what interests me, is that the current scholarly consensus is that Jesus is not being quoted in the following (thanks to ChatGPT for the list):