This is my homily for yesterday, the Feast of the Holy Family of Jesus, Mary and Joseph, Cycle B. The readings for last Sunday are here.
The Catholic church designates the Sunday after Christmas every year as the Feast of the Holy Family. Of course, the original Holy Family is Joseph, Mary and the child Jesus. We have a wonderful statue of them back there in our Narthex. The Catholic church holds up to all of us today that historical Holy Family as a model for our own families.
I would
guess that many of us have pre-existing notions or assumptions of what an ideal
family should be like. These notions and
assumptions arise from our own experiences, as all of us come from a family,
one way or another. These notions also
are fed to us by the larger culture, and they are reinforced in the media and
social media. These notions and
assumptions tend to come to the fore during this holiday season, when family
gatherings can be a great source of joy, but also, for some of us, a source of
stress. There even are people who dread
having to gather as a family during this time of year. We have these ideas, or even aspirations, of
what an ideal family should consist of, and we see that our own families don’t always
measure up to our ideal.
Having lived
in this community for several decades now, and having helped to rear a family
here, I’ll describe what I think is a common set of family aspirations in our
community. I think the ideal looks something
like this: mom and dad are married and have two or three children together. Dad and mom both have college degrees. They both work in professional careers and
have achieved a good balance between family and career. They are financially comfortable and stay physically
active and fit. They own their home,
which they maintain well, inside and out. They stay out of serious debt trouble. The children are healthy, get along with one
another, do well in school, and play sports.
When the children graduate from high school, they’ll go on to college
and then postgraduate school and become career professionals themselves. Nobody is greatly inconvenienced by mental illness.
That’s my attempt
to paint our culture’s picture of an ideal family. To be sure, the reality for some of us may be
little or nothing like what I’ve just described. For some of us, what I’ve described might be
close to our lived reality, in some if not all respects. And let me hasten to add: there is nothing
particularly wrong with the picture I’ve tried to sketch. We should make good use of our gifts, and
live loving, healthy and hard-working lives, and often that approach leads to
prosperity, peace and stability in our families. Those are all good and desirable things. If that is your family reality, then those
are things for which we should offer thanks and praise to God, every day.
And yet –
what I’ve described is hardly a portrait of the original Holy Family.
The first
thing to note about the Holy Family is that they are a stepfamily. What I mean by that is: Mary is the child’s biological
mother, but Joseph is not the biological father. He is a stepfather. One of the reasons we esteem St. Joseph so highly
in the Catholic church is that he was willing to marry this woman who had a
child, seemingly with someone else. To
be sure: that sort of thing happens today as well: according to the Pew Research
Center, over ten million children in the United States have at least one stepparent.
But if you
think that every man who is single is willing to do what St. Joseph did and
marry a woman who already is a mom, I encourage you to speak with some young single
moms who would like to meet a marriageable man.
I’m told that many single men are upfront about not wishing to meet or
date a woman with children. I really
think we need more St. Josephs in our contemporary society. It seems one possible mark of a holy family
is the parents’ willingness to accept, and love, children who are not biologically
their own. By the way, there are
families here at St. Edna who have done this: who have adopted children, or who
have served as foster parents. Some day
I hope to give one or two of them a chance to speak with us. I firmly believe they are leading holy lives.
The next thing
to note about the Holy Family that deviates from the ideal family I described
is that apparently they were not very prosperous. In fact, they were poor. The story of Jesus’s birth, in a barn or
stable because the parents had no other shelter, is one of poverty. Today’s
Gospel suggests that Mary offered two birds – pigeons or turtledoves – in sacrifice
for her burnt offering and purification offering after giving birth to a son. The Law of Moses actually
stipulates that a year-old lamb be offered for the burnt offering; but families
who couldn’t afford a lamb could offer a second bird instead. Apparently, that was the case for the Holy
Family: a bird was all they could afford.
These details in scripture suggest the Holy Family was poor.
One more
thing to note about the Holy Family, in comparison to our picture of the ideal
family: the Holy Family became refugees when King Herod slaughtered all the
male babies two years old and younger. Joseph
and his family fled to Egypt
and stayed there until Herod died. If
you follow the news, you may have seen news items in recent days of a large walking
caravan of migrants, a thousand or more people, in Mexico. The caravan crossed Mexico’s southern border
some days ago and has been walking northward since, toward our southern border.
We might picture Jesus, Mary and Joseph
as being in such a caravan of walkers, seeking asylum so they can be protected
from political violence in their own country.
That’s not quite the picture of the ideal family I had described a few
minutes ago.
So whatever
a holy family consists of, it seems it needn’t be a secure, prosperous biologically
unified family.
What is
required for us to be a holy family?
First and foremost, it requires that our families love and worship God,
just as the Holy Family loved and worshiped God. As the Holy Family took time to go to the
Temple we must make room for God in our family life. We must carve out time, each week, to come to
church to worship as a family. We must ensure
our children receive sacramental grace by achieving the sacramental milestones
of Baptism, Reconciliation, Eucharist and Confirmation. And we must pray as a family, not only at
church, but also in our homes, at mealtimes, or bedtimes, or in the mornings,
or whatever times are suitable to our family’s daily rhythms.
Second, we
must follow the rules for living which Jesus taught us, just as the Holy Family
obeyed the Law of Moses. It is in our
families that we learn to serve one another.
Parents serve their children by caring for them. Grandparents do the same. Children also serve their parents and one another
by doing their chores and fulfilling their family responsibilities. It’s also in our families that we learn to
forgive one another, and where we learn to bear with one another in patience
and compassion. Serving and forgiving
are things that Jesus commanded us to do. It’s only when we learn them in our family
life that we can take these holy habits out into the world.
We don’t need
to be perfect families – in fact, it’s impossible for our families to be
perfect. There is too much sin, too much
mental illness, too many imperfections in ourselves and in our family
members. But with God’s help, it’s possible
for us to be holy families. Let us make
a New Year’s resolution that we’ll spend less emotional energy on wishing for
our families be ideal families; instead, let us resolve that we’ll continue to
welcome God into our family life; and let us pray that God continue to bless
our families by making them holy families.
Good point that we can all be holy families, with God's grace. It's worth noting, too, that families who seem to have it all together often have sorrows and problems which aren't obvious from the outside. We just need to be kind to one another because we don't know what kind of burdens people are carrying.
ReplyDeleteI like your pointing out that the Holy Family was not a comfy nuclear unit of suburban stability.
ReplyDeletePeople are disappointing. Your friends, your doctors, the clerk at the Help Desk, your car mechanic, the guy who makes your coffee. All of them, including and especially your spouse, your kids, and your extended family. And all of us are just as disappointing as everyone else. Almost never is any malice intended. We're just poor slobs with heads full of worries, regrets, and distractions, and we never rise to any occasion perfectly.
The thing I get out of regular prayer at home is perspective. God is always telling me to recalibrate expectations for others and to be that much more grateful when somebody surprises me by not screwing up. And to ask for the grace to surprise others by not letting them down occasionally.
From this weekend liturgies, the clergy seem to have gotten the idea that holy families are not necessarily perfect families. One Italian priest told us that he knew he lived in a holy family because his mother was always shouting "Jesus ! Mary! Joseph!" at him.
ReplyDeleteJack - I am sure his mother meant that only in the most pious way :-)
DeleteIn thinking about what to preach last weekend, I had kicked around in my mind the notion that broken families can be holy families, and seek to relate that somehow to the breaking of the bread. I'll continue to think about it.
Yes - keep thinking. We’ll be interested in what you come up with.
DeleteTo be fair to men who are reluctant or unwilling to marry women pregnant by other men, such men today haven't been informed—as Joseph was—that it's all God's doing and they should go ahead.
ReplyDeleteThere is not one word of Joseph's recorded, and he is mentioned in only Matthew and Luke and nowhere else in the New Testament. What little can be said about him (assuming he existed) comes largely from imagination.
And yet, the genealogy in Matthew's Gospel is of Joseph's side. I always thought he should have included Mary's.
DeleteOne thing we know about that time and place is that there was no way a girl could live on her own as a single mom. So Mary's husband had to exist. He may not have said anything that is recorded, but we know he stepped up to the plate the times he needed to.
Well, I’ve long felt it a bit strange that the perfect Holy family had a virgin as mom, and a perfect , sinless child, and a husband who , if he existed as David notes, was truly a saint.
ReplyDeleteHard for real families to relate.
The perfect, sinless child was eventually deemed a criminal subversive and dealt with accordingly. One of my cousins, perhaps due to the turbulence in his own parents' relationship (eventually divorced), was a big fan of Ozzie and Harriet reruns. I guess Platonic ideals have their place.
ReplyDeleteRe: "The perfect, sinless child was eventually deemed a criminal subversive and dealt with accordingly."
ReplyDeleteI often reproduce this quote from F. F. Bruce: "It is all too easy to believe in a Jesus who is largely a construction of our own imagination—an inoffensive person whom no one would really trouble to crucify. But the Jesus whom we meet in the Gospels, far from being an inoffensive person, gave offense right and left."
The elementary-school, Baltimore Catechism view of Jesus is that he was "gentle . . . meek and mild." He was no threat to anyone, would not have hurt a fly, and his message was more or less "can't we all get along?"
The problem comes, in my opinion, when an attempt is made to imagine literary creations like Joseph as living and breathing human beings, and speculate on how they would have behaved in situations of which the Gospels say nothing.
Saint Joseph may have been simply the real, biological father of Jesus (Bart Ehrman's opinion), more-or-less of a device (in two Gospels but nowhere else in the NT) to connect Jesus to the House of David, or the figure revered by the Catholic Church today.
One of the people in my Old English group is doing work on Aelfric's vernacular translation of the Heptateuch. He is looking at the caveats Aelfric made in various places. For example, where Abraham has everybody circumcised in Genesis, there is an addition, "In these days people must not do this." Apparently whole swaths of Leviticus are just deleted. Elsewhere, there is a formula used to indicate commentary, "Now we would say ...", to help listeners understand that followers of Jesus are not bound to Judaic law. Now we have RCIA Church Ladies to provide these asides!
ReplyDeleteSeveral people in the group made the point that transcription from the oral tradition and later translation of texts made from that tradition is always a selective process. People centuries ago recognized this. Possibly that's why lots of icons depict English scholar-saints with pen in hand and the dove of the Holy Spirit hovering above. The message is that you can trust the gist of what's here. The spiritual lesson is pure.
I agree with David's point that we often make Scriptural figures into what we want them to be and extrapolate their actions and thoughts from thin or whole cloth. Lord knows you see hagiographies having a field day along these lined.
But this has never bothered me because whatever we concoct still has to be true to the spiritual teaching at the heart of it all.
Speaking of hagiographies whose historical accuracy may be dubious, I ran across the story of the Seven Holy Sleepers of Ephesus lately:
Deletehttps://www.oca.org/saints/lives/2021/08/04/102195-7-holy-youths-seven-sleepers-of-ephesus
I like the story even if it didn't happen exactly that way. It is fascinating that they wake up after hundreds of years have passed, and don't quite recognize their world any more. Kind of like Rip Van Winkle only more so.
Interesting that they are the patrons of insomniacs, which I sometimes am.
Then there's St Drogo, patron saint of coffee, who couldn't stay awake!
DeleteOnly two of the four Gospels contain infancy narratives. The literary convention for political figures was to have them foreshadow the adult lives.
ReplyDeleteCertainly that is true of Matthew’s narrative of about Herod and the Child Jesus.
Luke’s infancy narrative seems to be a foreshadowing of the Jerusalem community of Acts. Jesus and his family are presented as ideal observers of the Jewish law.
Why did Matthew and Luke seem to think that Mark (and Q) needed an infancy narrative? As David notes, Jesus is presented as the descendent of King David. Both Matthew and Luke seem to want to show that Christianity is a rightful descendent of Israel and its Scriptures. Those were admired by Romans at the time much like Virgil.