UPDATE:
The text is not much longer than the impromptu remarks.
First he reiterates the general approach he wants theologians to take.
Turning then to your more specific task, in my Letter addressed to the new Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, I emphasized that today “we need a way of thinking that knows how to convincingly present a God who loves, who forgives, who saves, who liberates, who promotes people and summons them to fraternal service” (1 July 2023). You are required to address this need in a qualified manner, through the proposal of an evangelizing theology, which promotes dialogue with the world of culture. And it is essential that you theologians do this in tune with the People of God, I would say “from below”, that is, with a privileged gaze for the poor and the simple, and at the same time “on your knees”, because theology is born kneeling, in adoration of God.
Then he applies this to their project on "the Trinitarian and Christological faith confessed by the Council of Nicaea, which we are preparing to commemorate 1700 years after its celebration, coinciding with the Jubilee called for the year 2025."
He notes the lack of women in the group;
But there is something about you that I do not like; pardon my sincerity. One, two, three, four women: poor women! They are alone! Ah, excuse me, five. We must advance in this.
I am not sure that women will be very pleased by his next remarks:
The Church is woman. And if we do not know what a woman is, what the theology of a woman is, we will never understand what the Church is. One of the great sins we have had is to “masculinize” the Church. And this is not solved by the ministerial path; that is something else. It is resolved in the mystical way, the real way. Balthasar’s thought has brought me so much light: Petrine principle and Marian principle. This can be debated, but the two principles are there. The Marian is more important than the Petrine, because there is the bride Church, the woman Church, without being masculine.
He explicitly says that demasculinizing the Church is not solved by admitting women to ministry! His mystical way is in fact just another version of masculine/feminine cultural polarity made popular by a theologian Balthazar, which has influenced JP2 and B16.
Personally, I do not think that imagining ourselves as brides of Christ, whether we are men or women is very helpful. A young woman religious at ND said that while she often imagined herself as the bride of Christ, she wondered how men could. I responded that I usually do not think of Jesus as either Lord, King, or Spouse but as my Teacher and Friend.
Of course, I think that women could also see Him as Teacher and Friend. We might also see Jesus as our Brother, and each other as Children of God. I think this is the practical way forward if we wish to have a less masculine Church. In today's culture we can imagine both women and men as teachers, friends, and siblings while Lords and Kings are male. The spousal imagery which is present in both Old and New Testaments is simply confusing. The spouse of the Old Testament was simply another version of a Lord and King.
The International Theological Commission is part of the Roman Curia and advises the Vatican doctrinal department on theological issues. The pope appoints its members, and women have been allowed to become members since 2004.