Friday, November 3, 2023

Apostolic Delegate on U.S. Bishops

America has a great interview of Christophe Pierre, the Apostolic Delegate to the U.S. who was recently made a Cardinal. His duty here has been extended indefinitely.  Betty and I have come to admire him for this well thought out homilies when he presides on feasts at the National Shrine such as All Saints Day.  He was welcomed with full honors with four bishops including the Archbishop who is head of the military diocese and currently the president of the bishop's conference.  

Cardinal Pierre on why the U.S. bishops are struggling to connect with Pope Francis

 Cardinal Pierre said he was “shocked” to learn that many U.S. Catholic bishops did not know that synodality had developed in South America in the last few decades and are still struggling to understand what it is. “We cannot say there are bishops who are on the left and ones that are on the right. This is a false analysis,” he said. They are “good men,” he said, but “they are all struggling” to find ways to evangelize in this new moment in history and to cope with the economic fallout from the abuse scandal.



I began by asking the cardinal about his life and his 46 years’ service in the Holy See’s diplomatic missions worldwide. “My life is a bit complicated,” he said, referring to the fact that he spent 20 years in Africa and 20 in South America.

On March 22, 2007, Pope Benedict XVI appointed then-Archbishop Pierre as nuncio to Mexico. He arrived in Mexico as the milestone Fifth Conference of CELAM (the Episcopal Conference of Latin America and the Caribbean) in Aparecida, Brazil, ended. Archbishop Pierre was welcomed by Bishop Carlos Aguiar Retes, now cardinal-archbishop of Mexico City and one of the president-delegates of the Synod on Synodality.

“I still remember when I arrived at the airport, we talked about Aparecida because he had just arrived back from there the day before. I was interested because I had good knowledge of South America. I was there at the time of liberation theology, and many things had happened from the fall of the Berlin Wall on Nov. 9, 1989, to my arrival in Mexico.”

The Aparecida conference, he said, was “a kind of synodal process of the South American bishops.”

“This is the only continent that has made such a synodal process,” Cardinal Pierre said. “The bishops developed a kind of dynamic of working together and looking for solutions together, to evangelize better, which is what the synod [on synodality] is all about. Nothing else: Better evangelization. And they accompanied the people in their suffering, in their difficulties, and in their challenges.”

At Aparecida, the bishops decided to write a document to address “the difficulty to transmit the faith from one generation to the next” in a new cultural context. Then-Cardinal Bergoglio, the future Pope Francis, was elected president of the writing commission by a vote of 112 out of 130.

“When I arrived in Mexico in 2007, I read the document of Aparecida,” Cardinal Pierre recalled. “It was six years before the election of Pope Francis. I read it, and I said, ‘My God, this is new! The bishops finally have developed a pastoral plan which is the result of their synodal approach.’”

“The fruit of Aparecida is a new pastoral approach,” he said. “I saw it working in Mexico. It changes the church.”

When he arrived in the United States, nine years later, in 2016, Cardinal Pierre said, “I was astounded that many of the bishops didn’t know what had happened in Aparecida. They did not know that ‘Evangelii Gaudium,’ the first document of Pope Francis, was rooted in Aparecida.”

“They had not seen what had happened in their own continent, in South America,” he remarked. “This is very serious, because what has happened was not banal. It was the beginning of what we live today. They didn’t know that the pope was one of the bishops at Aparecida, or that the whole South American church had made a tremendous effort of synodality.”

At Aparecida, the cardinal said, “the bishops said the church and society have changed, and the transmission of the faith is not done through the culture as in the past, so we have to provide new opportunities and ways for people to have a personal encounter with Christ through a church that is fitting to the new society, a new way of being Catholic. This demands a readjustment of the pastoral approach, which is very difficult to do because people are, we all are, set in our views, in our ways of preaching and organizing.”

“This is especially true in the United States, where we have a very organized church, which has worked beautifully for many years,” Cardinal Pierre said. “Over 200 years, we have built fantastic church schools, hospitals, parishes, and churches. But almost nobody comes [to church] anymore… so Pope Francis said, ‘Go out of the church.’ But we still remain in the church. Why?”

“Pope Francis said, ‘I want a missionary church. I want a church of the poor that goes out to the poor.’” But, the cardinal recalled, when he arrived in the United States as nuncio in 2016 he was “shocked” to hear some in the church laugh at that and dismiss it as “Bergoglio’s idea.” He insisted: “The reality is that behind the vision of the pope there is Aparecida. Bergoglio is not the inventor of that approach. The Holy Spirit inspired this synodal approach at Aparecida.”

“Six years later, Bergoglio was elected pope by the grace of the Holy Spirit,” he said. “That’s my faith. And the new pope followed in the footsteps of Aparecida.”

14 comments:

  1. This is a great article, the best thing on US Bishops and Synodality.

    This guy is not only a great diplomate he is also a deep thinker. I was going to try to summarize the article but found that I had to keep quoting paragraph after paragraph. I hope you all have access to the full article.

    He has more to say about the US, but his insights into the origin of synodal approach in Latin America are key.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I read the article yesterday. I agree, it is very good. Was going to do a post about it but you beat me to it :-)

    I'm pleased that he resists the urge to follow the conventional left/right critique.

    I don't know whether his thoughts about American bishops are as applicable to the Canadian bishops, but I would guess that they are. The fact is, the US as a whole (and Canada as a whole) is considerably more Anglo-centric than Latin-America-centric. Even though we all inhabit (very, very broadly speaking) the same land mass, for Americans and Canadians the dominant culture (sorry, Quebec) hearkens back to Britannia, whereas for the Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking countries, the dominant culture hearkens back to Iberia. Different histories, different languages, different cultures.

    His observations about American obliviousness to Aparecida are so on point, one can only think he reads this blog :-).

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is my comment on the America website"

    Cardinal Pierre is not only a diplomate but a profound thinker. He rightly points out that the importance of synods of bishops is not a new idea dreamed up by Pope Francis but a strong emphasis of Latin American bishops walking together across Central and South America as they worked out the implications of Vatican II for Latin America.

    They have faced their common problems without becoming tied to either global Catholic answers or nationalistic programs of bishops’ conferences.

    As Cardinal Pierre points out the Latin American bishops unlike American bishops have recognized that they need to get beyond the existing Catholic institutions that have served previous eras.

    In his 2002 book The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity, Philip Jenkins argued that the Christian population by 2025 will have shifted to South America, Africa, and Asia, i.e., the Global South.

    The extensive organization of the Latin American bishops should be seen as the first step in a process which has resulted in the election of a Latin American Pope to guide the universal church in its transformation into a Global Church.

    The problems faced by Catholicism are very different across the various continental regions. That is why we had a continental phase of the Synod.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sounds like the challenge of the Aparecida document boils down to whether American bishops (and, eventually, lower ranking clergy, religious, monastics, and, ultimately, lay people) want to see themselves as accompanists or gatekeepers.

    There probably isn't a "pure" accompanist/gatekeeper type. The doctrines of the Church make a certain amount if gatekeeping around the sacraments inevitable.

    But most of us can peg our bishops, priests, and deacons as more one than the other. We can also peg certain parishes as more likely to be accompanist or gatekeeping.

    I'm guessing that most parishes see themselves as "welcoming" (which an outsider may or may not agree with). But it would be interesting to have criteria that parishes could use to determine where they fall on the accompanist/gatekeeper axis. And whether parishes would want to change anything as a result.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Something bad is happening with my husband right now. Please pray.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Praying and commending him to the Sacred Heart of Jesus

      Delete
    2. TY. He was rushed to UCLA med center last night from the rehab hospital. His infection was huge and he spiked a 106.6 fever but he made it through. Getting better but there is still danger so don’t stop praying now. For me too. I’m a basket case.

      Delete
    3. Thanks for the update, our prayers continue for both of you.

      Delete
    4. Jean, I am horrified by the priest running your parish.Is there another that you and Raber could go to that isn’t too, too far away?

      I have come to consider all of you to be friends. And I think of NewGathering as a safe space to air my doubts, fears and concerns about my husband’s health and also about my faith struggles for the last several years.

      My husband was in septic shock and my eldest son was advised to call whoever needs to be called. I didn’t know that until this morning. God blessed us with an exceptional young ER doctor who was puzzled by a lot of things and figured out a solution. He and an extraordinary ICU nurse worked together to bring my husband back from the edge. The nurse refused to take her dinner break all night to stay with my husband every minute to monitor his condition. How can I even begin to thank God for the gift of those two people. The Dr made me nervous because he looked about 16. But he was good, and willing to take a risk to save my husband using a rare procedure.

      I need someplace to share my fears and ask for prayers beyond my family and friends because they too are scared. You all are faithful, prayerful Christian’s ( most of the family and friends aren’t) and I believe that God and the saints might be more likely to listen to you than to Anne, who only returned to constant prayers, especially the rosary, after finding myself in that infamous foxhole where nobody is an atheist.I feel unworthy to ask for help from God, Mary, the angels and saints, even though I’ve tried to follow Christ, Jesus’s teachings in the Bible. But I pray anyway, hoping that God is aGod of love, mercy and forgiveness.

      Jean, you and all here have “ been there for me”. We want to be there for you too. Jean, who are a very faithful christian. Not so sure about the priest at your parish. I will add him to my own prayers, that he will come to know what Jesus taught in the gospels.

      He’s still in danger, but getting slowly better.

      Delete
    5. I am glad to hear your husband has such attentive caregivers and that he is better. I wonder if a brewing infection might affect his mental state somewhat. If so I hope his depression lifts with the infection.

      Delete
    6. Anne, of course we will pray. And I don't know of a reason God wouldn't listen to you as well. My friendly advice is: ask a saint to help.

      Delete
    7. When I was a member of the mostly voluntary pastoral staff in Toledo in the eighties, we each took turns leading the prayer that began our meetings. We had a very diverse spiritual background, and sharing that background really helped to bond the group.

      Joe, our accountant, was reluctant to lead the prayer. After begging off several times, we finally told him he had to take his turn.

      With his head held down he began by telling us why he was unable to pray. As he continued, we began to look at each other because we all had the same thought.

      We were seeing a reenactment of the story of the Publican and Pharisee at prayer. Joe’s inability to pray was in fact the best prayer.

      Delete