Thursday, April 21, 2022

Challenges and Opportunities of Livestreaming & Recording Liturgies

The Pandemic has brought livestreaming and recording of Masses to many of our parishes. Over the course of the pandemic, I have noted improvements in the quality of video and audio from these efforts. The future of livestreaming for parish life remains to be seen. 

The Challenges and Opportunities of Livestreaming/Recoded Liturgies

1. My hunch is some parishes will take up these challenges and opportunities and become models and magnet parishes for outreach and evangelization.

2. These parishes will make livestream access to all parish liturgies a priority, i.e., all weekend liturgies, plus all baptisms, weddings and funerals, unless there is a good reason for keeping them low keyed and private.  Like with sports, emphasis on livestreaming not simply recording will be the key to engaging people.  

3. These parishes, like progressive Anglican communities today, will include the video audience in their greetings, make worship leaflets available for their participation, and design their websites as much for their virtual congregation as for their physical congregation. 

4. These parishes will prioritize video outreach to parish members that do not regularly attend services, encouraging them to attend through livestreaming. These will include not only the homebound for health and disability reasons, but also people with heavy work schedules, those who need to take care of others, etc. The parish will work with parents with young children to provide a variety of ways both at church and in the home to facilitate the participation in liturgical worship

5. Communion to those at home will become a normal part of worship, e.g., ministers to the homebound will be dismissed after communion to people who are watching by livestream. Or in some cases these ministers may join people at home for the entire Mass bringing the reserved Eucharist with them so that all would communicate during the livestreamed communion.

6. Worship would the most prominent aspect of a parish website with videos of current hymns playing on the homepage. The choir would be a support for the entire parish, including the virtual parish, by livestreaming and recording choir practices. Typically, our choir warms up by doing the responsorial psalms plus hymns for next weekend before working on new songs.  In one of our local parishes where the choir practices these before Mass, there was a parish outcry when the music director proposed the choir practice elsewhere. People liked to hear these as preparation for Mass

*******************************

For many years NPM had an interesting article by Bishop Untener of Saginaw on their website.  He died in 2004; the article has disappeared.  In his article he described videotaping live Masses and studying them with his fellow priests. His pioneering work is very relevant now that many parishes are livestreaming and recording Masses.  I have a copy of the article and have shortened it to focus upon the videotaping.

Ritual and Community: What I've Learned in the Parishes

By Bishop Kenneth E. Untener

"I began a program about four years ago, in which I asked five priests each month to videotape a live weekend liturgy and send the video to me. I videotaped a live liturgy that I do, and copies of each of the tapes are sent to all six of the participants.

After each of us has reviewed all the tapes, we meet for two hours to talk about what we have seen, and we try to help each other do it better--not only the act of presiding, of course, but we also try to find ways to improve the music, the use of the liturgical space, and so on. We have wonderful conversations about all of this, then we all go home and do it again, the same six people, making a new video, sharing copies of all six videos, meeting once more to talk about it. In these past four years I have watched a lot of videos! And I have watched myself presiding and preaching at liturgy a lot!

One of the chief reasons for the lack of interest shown by many members of our assemblies has to be the lack of direct involvement they have in the basic elements that make up our ritual

Four Major Ritual Languages "spoken" at Mass:
Silence, Movement and Gesture, the Spoken Word, and the Musical Word. 

How much of each of those languages do the members of the congregation get to "speak" in an hour-long Mass?

There is very little silence at Mass. After a reading, or after communion, or after the invitation to pray, when the ritual books call for shared silence, there is very little of such sharing. In fact, reviewing the videos with a stopwatch, I have counted at most sixty seconds of such silence at a Mass. 

There are many movements and many gestures during the course of a Mass, but the congregation gets to move very little

We seem to think that, because more people are involved in doing the liturgy, "the people" have more to do. But that does not follow; it is an illusion. As one member of a congregation once told me, "All we get to do is stand, sit, say 'Amen,' and go to the bathroom." 

The two biggest gestures in which all (or most) of the members of the assembly are involved at Mass come close together—the exchange of the peace, and processing to communion. By my calculations, from joining in the Our Father through the exchange of the peace and processing to communion, the members of the congregation normally get to join in about three-and-a-half minutes of movement.

As concerns the congregation's direct involvement in the spoken word (which I have timed with a stopwatch): If there is a creed, the congregation gets to speak for a total of ninety seconds. If there is no creed, fifty-eight seconds. That includes every "Amen," every "Lord, have mercy," every spoken word assigned to the congregation.

Congregational participation in the sung word varies quite a bit from parish to parish and from liturgy to liturgy. But, generally, if there is a sung Gloria, most members of the assembly get to sing for eight to nine minutes. By far, then, the biggest ritual entrĂ©e that most of the assembly has to what is going on is the music. This fact is of significant importance to pastoral musicians. 

In sum, then, the total amount of time for direct participation by the congregation--actually "doing" any kind of ritual "language"--in a whole hour- long Mass is about thirteen or fourteen minutes.

Gathering Rite of the Mass

The gathering rite at Mass ranks second (behind the communion rite) in opportunities for congregational involvement in the four ritual languages, because there is a lot of ritual involvement in getting ready to come to church, parking, entering the building, greeting other people, finding a place to sit, talking to people in neighboring seats--all those actions, unfortunately, that are not normally considered part of the gathering rite. If, after all of this has taken place, followed by the entrance procession and opening hymn, any presider says, "Let us begin in the name of the Father . . .," there is a clear lack of understanding about what has been going on for the past twenty minutes!

Liturgy of the Word

The liturgy of the word usually takes about twenty to thirty minutes, during which time the congregation gets to do hardly anything. They sit from the first reading; they stand for the Alleluia and the Gospel; they sit for the homily; they stand for the creed and the general intercessions. There is very little for them to do in terms of speaking and singing: the responses to the readings, the refrain of the responsorial psalm, the text of the creed, the response to the petitions of the general intercessions. There are few opportunities for silence, usually, though it is called for after each of the readings and after the homily.(2) 

How well the readings themselves are proclaimed depends on the place and the reader. When asked about acting, the late Frank Sinatra once commented: "There's no trick to acting. All you have to do is know the lines like you know your own name." Similarly, there's no trick to being a good lector; all you have to do is know those texts like you know your name. Of course, to do that, you'll have to spend a few hours in preparation—not learning where to pause, but learning what the text means

The Preparation of the Gifts

In terms of congregational movement, for instance, the majority of the assembly gets to sit for the preparation of gifts from beginning to end, while four people bring the gifts forward and ushers take up the collection. This is not community ritual. During the Eucharistic prayer, they stand for the preface and kneel for the rest of the prayer, with no additional movements or changes of posture--no sign of the cross, no bow, no beating of the breast.(6) That is not ritual.

In other words, there is very little for the congregation to do during this whole stretch from the preparation of the gifts through the end of the Eucharistic prayer. They move very little; they have no assigned gestures; they have little to say or sing; there is little, if any, communal silence. 

What else might be done? During Lent of 1998 in our diocese, we emphasized the notion of almsgiving. One way of focusing on this theme was to invite people to come forward at preparation time with specific gifts, for which they had been prepared the previous week: food one week; then dry goods for the poor that are not covered by food stamps; then a card on which they wrote a nice letter to any legislator in the country (or the world), asking them to be more careful of the poor; and so on. (Parishes also provided baskets in which they could place their money offering as they came forward.) For most people, this was a whole new experience of this part of the Mass.

The Eucharistic Prayer

Just a few people bring forward the gifts; the Eucharistic prayer seems to follow the same trajectory as the liturgy of the word (God talks to them in the word, and the priest talks to them--and to the bread and cup--in the Eucharistic prayer). It doesn't look or sound as if the priest is talking to God); if it is perceived as prayer of any kind, it is the "priest's prayer." In my rating system, this highest part of the Mass comes in dead last, lower than the gathering rite and the dismissal rite.

The Communion Rite

Based on my three criteria for participation, the communion rite comes in first. This is when we have all that movement of the Lord's Prayer (if they join hands or raise their hands in prayer), the sign of peace, and the communion procession. There is a lot of congregational speaking and singing, and there is occasionally shared silence. The rite is cluttered and fragmented, but people generally understand what is taking place. They love the Our Father, and they know what it means. They may not know exactly what the sign of peace is, thinking of it more as a friendly greeting than as a mutual exchange of the peace of Christ, but most of them love it. They know what sacramental communion is about. They may not understand the prayer after communion very well; in fact, even some priests tend to think of it as part of the dismissal rite than as part of communion, though the text always speaks about what we just did. Often there is not enough shared silence, but we can work on that. 

The biggest thing that is lacking is reverence, not only on the part of the congregation who come forward to receive communion, but also on the part of those who handle and minister the consecrated elements. People don't seem to understand, when they hold the consecrated bread or drink from the cup, that they are holding and sharing the mystery of the Holy Trinity, the Triune God with a human being at the center, because they are sharing the full mystery of Jesus, died and risen. They don't understand that the Amen they speak is an acceptance of what Jesus accepted at Gethsemani and at Easter, an acceptance of the Lord into their lives right now, no matter what that might mean in fidelity to God's will.

Dismissal

 And we still have to figure out what to do with the congregation after the communion procession is over. 

Although this rite is very brief, it comes in third for congregational participation, behind the communion rite and the gathering rite. It's pretty obvious what's supposed to be happening, but I'm not sure that people have a sense that they are being "sent" by this rite; that awareness could certainly be enhanced. 

In sum, then, we have a ritual that is wonderful, but we have to find ways to let the people do more. There are a hundred ways we can do that (legally), if we are willing to make the Mass something other than a Prussian close-order drill. There are ways to help people understand what is going on. They love the Mass, and they want to know about it, and they are grateful to find out. There are certainly ways to do the ritual better, and I am proud of all those who are working to find those ways

My Conclusion 

Study of recorded liturgies not only by the liturgical ministers but also by various sectors of the parish, including those who do not regularly attend liturgies, should slowly with a lot of consultation and experimentation make our liturgies more attractive not only to those who actively participate physically but also to those who become an active part of the parish virtual community.  Untener is correct: “There are a hundred ways we can do that (legally), if we are willing to make the Mass something other than a Prussian close-order drill.”

 



19 comments:

  1. Very interesting, Jack.

    I didn't know Bishop Untener at all, but knew priests, brothers of friends, who knew him well and liked him. But he was a polarizing figure, accused by many of having too many new ideas and not staying in the bishop's mansion enough.

    The general consensus as more progressive Catholics leave the Church, is that Bp. Untener was an aberration. I think his Lenten books are still around, but a lot of his ideas have been purged.

    Too bad bc there seems to be a lot of good observations in his article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jean,

      Your thinking reminds me of some sociologists, including prominent ones, who argued in the seventies and eighties that conservative churches were growing because they attracted people who wanted a message that strongly contrasted with society. (That seemed to me to ignore the fact that many liberal churches have different messages that also strongly contrast with society).

      Anyway, Andrew Greeley was smart enough to figure out that conservative churches were growing mainly because they had higher birth rates than liberal churches. As their birth rates have now also declined, they too are declining while the Catholic Church has leveled out largely due to higher immigrant birth rates. Poor Andrew Greeley never got the respect that he deserved from the bishops or his fellow sociologists.

      As for the liturgy, the Church tried the New Missal and it failed. They are constantly trying new forms of catechesis in hope that they will convince Catholics to go to boring church services. Those are failing. In some parts of the country like SW Pennsylvania the parishes are so collapsing that it would be difficult for me to get to a church through their winding roads if I still lived there.

      Greeley long ago argued and documented that the Catholic clergy just give us far poorer liturgies than are provided in many other churches. I think liberals need to stay in the church and be as annoying to the religious authorities as Jesus was in his day. Pope Francis criticism of clericalism has provided us with a wonderful model of doing that.

      Delete
    2. Greeley seemed to be more popular w more non-Catholics than Catholics. After my mother died, I found a whole stack of his columns she had clipped out of the newspaper decades ago.

      I read his book "The Catholic Imagination" a couple years ago, and it reflected a lot of the reasons I was and still am drawn to the RCC.

      Re "virtual parishioners," for lack of a better term, I think reaching them is going to be hampered by the simple fact that "distance worshipers" have no way to make their presence felt.

      Just musing on the local parish: There has been a big infusion of newcomers from another parish. The new people are busily creating more programs with an emphasis on folks with children and those who willing/able to live church services.

      I think that's a good development overall. But I do think that outreach to the elderly, the bulk of those virtual parishioners, is just not on their agenda.

      It is not surprising that priests, staff, and parish councils will be most likely to serve those they can hear and see (and who put money in the collection) rather than those tuning in at home.

      I do look at the prayer list in the bulletins Raber brings home, and those on the list are friends and family of parishioners who attend live. Those who are elderly and cannot get to Mass (I'm not including mysef in that group) are never on the list unless they have a live attendee who remembers them.

      Delete
    3. "Your thinking reminds me of some sociologists, including prominent ones, who argued in the seventies and eighties that conservative churches were growing because they attracted people who wanted a message that strongly contrasted with society."

      That approach was successful in some places. It's still successful in some places. But to succeed, it needs the right confluence of the leader and the people. It wouldn't fly in a place like ours, because our people, by and large, are not culture warriors who think society is going to hell in a handbasket. (One sure way to make a pastor crash and burn is to assign a going-to-hell-in-a-handbasket pastor to a parish whose people don't see the world that way.)

      Btw, I would say there were, and I hope still are, some "liberal" faith communities that thrive by being different in a liberal way. Again, it requires the right pastor in the right community. When I was a young adult, I belonged to that kind of a faith community.

      Delete
    4. Jean, I liked Greeley's fiction books. He wrote some good mysteries, and there were some others. There was an interesting quirky one called "The God Game" about an interactive video game, written several years before they became an actual thing.

      Delete
    5. I have a terrible memory of reading a Greeley mystery while buzzed up on opioids after abdominal surgery in 2001. That stuff makes me restless, and the nurse said I was walking around too much. It was the only book Raber could find in the gift shop that he thought I might like. I remember nothing about it except that the protagonist was carrying on an affair with his ex-wife.

      Delete
  2. I agree with all your points. Some Catholic parishes are ahead of the curve in using technology to foster virtual worship. Some (most?) are lagging behind. Ours isn't ahead of the curve but it's somewhere on the curve. Dioceses (ours, at least) are trying to work with parishes to help them get with the times on tech. Some things I've observed:

    * Technology is an investment, and many parishes (read: pastors) simply don't want to spend the money; or, in some cases, genuinely don't have the money

    * Even more important than the financial investment is having the right people in charge. I think a lot of parishes struggle to find the right person/people to oversee and manage the technology.

    * Related to the previous point: pastors and parish staffs are notoriously technophobic. Unless priests have a personal interest in technology (and some certainly do), there is nothing about their formation, background or duties which encourages them to become comfortable with technology. Some are from the "old school" and consider typing a letter to be a job for a parish secretary. And many parish staffs aren't what could be described as young and technically savvy.

    * The parishes that do well with livestreaming, media and technology are leveraging the parish's single greatest asset: the knowledge and enthusiasm of the people in the pews. Parishes which are thinking of creating a staff position to oversee this stuff shouldn't be looking for a technical genius; they should be looking for someone with the gift of inviting and motivating volunteers with the right gifts to be involved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that's right. I will say that the last two priests we had were both under 40 and technically savvy. One spent $15k on landscaping, the idea being that it would make more people want to visit. The other one spent a similar amount on rectory renovations (which were needed) and hymns for the bell tower. I do like the hymns, which I can hear from my house.

      Delete
    2. Re: technology, I'm just enough of a Luddite to not be that impressed with it in church. For me it's on a "need to know" basis. The thing I do think they need to be savvy about are sound systems. We are conscious of that in our music groups. If you can't hear the mics or they are muffled or distorted, it defeats the purpose.

      Delete
  3. As for technology the talent is there in young people, especially in our community colleges where I've taken many courses in photography, graphics, music etc. A lot of them are into music. So, finding a young person or several with a lot of talent that could put together a dynamic parish website full of music, and visual displays might not be that difficult. I suspect you might not have to pay them a lot if you gave them a lot of latitude in how they worked with the parish. In fact, they might make a parish website that would attract a group of talented young people that would be the future of the parish.

    During the summer, my virtual ND course in liturgy had several presentations by Steve Warner who once led the ND folk choir. He has been the music director for the University of Dubin parish. He said the secret to building a new music ministry is when a group of young people fall in love with each other's talents. They may not be particularly religious or do the music for very religious reasons. I think that's true of most great parish ministry.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interesting commentary about music and Jesus. Perhaps next year during Holy Week some of you musicians might suggest the hymn that Jesus is recorded in the gospels as singing with his disciples.

    https://tinyurl.com/yy94yxk4

    ReplyDelete
  5. While we're thinking live streaming Mass and outreach, we might want to think about diversity. About three percent of African-Americans identify as as Catholic, and a large number of those are immigrants, according to Pew in 2018. (Shannon Dee Williams has a story about African-Americans and Catholic schools in C'weal.)

    I am hinky about dragging identity politics into religion, but in the local parish, named for the Holy Family, the statues of Jesus, Mary, and Joseph look positively Scandinavian. There are no people of color in the pews.

    The last priest's attempts to reach the many Hispanic farm and construction laborers in our area was met with the odd response that we could take up a collection for them. These guys earn pretty good wages, which they send home. They live in apartments together. They do speak some English (I chatted with the men fixing the neighbor's roof).

    I saw the collection idea as a function of parishioners assuming that green card workers need soap and socks, and a way to stonewall any idea idea that they should be invited in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm blessed to be in a diverse parish. Of course, mostly white but lots of Hispanic, Filipino, African-American, full ebony African, Polish. There are Polish and Spanish masses though you'll hear both languages spoken as they leave the English masses. And there are "mixed race" marriages (we are so one race) that don't attract any attention. That's how I like my churches and my country as well.

      Delete
    2. Jean, I asked Betty what she would suggest with regard to your Hispanics. Betty's home parish for many years is bilingual having both Spanish and Bilingual Masses. She was cantor for the Bilingual Masses.

      She said simply ask them. The younger ones are more likely to speak English than the older ones. The older ones are more likely to be interested in maintaining their Catholicism.

      It might be something very simple in the beginning such as a Rosary and hospitality before or after Mass. They might suggest songs that they would like to sing. For the older ones who do not speak English they will need a bilingual Mass and therefore a priest who speaks Spanish or is willing to learn Spanish.

      Most of the Hispanics that live in Betty's former parish are from the same city in Mexico. They have their own customs, for example this city has a devotion to Mary as a child. They are also into the charismatic movement.

      The parish needs to give them what they want, not try to devise what they think they need such as a handout.

      Delete
    3. My former RC parish has one mass in Spanish every Sunday. It draws a large crowd every week. It seems to be a very vibrant community. The parish also celebrates some of the feast days that are most familiar to this congregation. Since most who attend the Spanish mass are from Central America, not Mexico, I was not familiar with some of them.

      Another parish nearby is a Franciscan parish. It is very diverse. I have attended mass there several times. I admire their work. Besides the large English and Spanish language groups there, they have a small group from Bangladesh and a French speaking community, primarily immigrants from Haiti and Africa. The parish has mass very week in English, Spanish and French. There is also a multi- cultural mass which is in English mostly, but includes prayers and music from the other cultures in the congregation. I’ve gone to it and it’s pretty amazing. Among their direct “services “ are ESL classes twice/ week. Probably a great idea for any parish with an immigrant population. When trump was on his anti- immigrant rampage the parish provided pro bono legal services as well.

      Perhaps you could get ideas from the information on the website. I noticed that the home page is featuring a Building Trades Workers Memorial Mass on Tuesday. Most of the building trade workers around here are recent immigrants.

      https://stcamilluschurch.org/

      Delete
    4. Jack, yes, asking people what they need is kind of a no-brainer, eh? However, Father Bob moved on, and Father Anthony is not focused on attracting the green card workers in the area. There is a huge Hispanic parish in Lansing, and general attitude locally is that "the Mexicans would be happier there."

      The local parish seems to be a way station for young priests to cut their teeth on before being assigned to larger suburban or urban parishes. As far as I can see, the need is for a stable lay group to identify and fulfill local needs without waiting for the priest or the poor ailing deacon to suggest things.

      Delete
    5. As far as I can see, the need is for a stable lay group to identify and fulfill local needs without waiting for the priest or the poor ailing deacon to suggest things.

      A stable group of laity is the post Vatican II definition of a parish. The parish council is obviously the group of people who should be articulating, identifying and evaluating whether local needs are being met.

      However, those councils are identified as pastoral councils who give advice to pastors rather than as parish councils who represent the needs of the parish and the community.

      I think that the parish and diocesan councils should be redesigned so that they relate primarily to people of our parishes and diocese. They should be charged with surfacing ideas, problems, etc. They should focus outwardly on parish members who do not go to church or participate in parish and diocesan programs, on nominal and former Catholics, on the Nones, and all the problems of the community. This is the role that Greenleaf sees for the board of Trustees in an organization. They should relate to the community rather than become involved in organization administration.

      I don't think that a parish board of trustees needs to have the legal power of hiring and firing the pastor in order to be effective. In fact, most boards of nonprofit organizations who have that power think of themselves as merely helping the administration. Greenleaf wanted to change all that. I think Catholics could accomplish what Greenleaf wanted without giving pastoral councils the legal authority of trustees. If we had effective parish and diocesan councils, we would not have the coverup of sexual and financial abuse problems.

      Delete
    6. As the number of priests age and shrink, I think that the lay groups you describe will have to form up if a parish is to survive.

      The down side is that a shrinking number of priests will be (and are even now being) relegated to sacramental functions over many parishes. I fear this could lead to priests becoming more mysticized and removed from "normal" life than they are now. There's a danger of fetishizing (even more than now) the holy oil, the holy water, the holy words, and the holy man.

      The local priest, who is under 40, certainly revels in the accoutrements and mystic functions of his office, and he has made several changes to reduce the participation of lectors and EMs. He sure loves his cassock and biretta.

      This, of course, is only one immature goof in a small combined parish out in the cornfield. But the fact that he has groupies who have followed him from previous parishes and who tell everyone he is "the real deal" (as if there were a lot of fake priests running around) makes me wary that the priesthood is attracting some mighty odd ducks these days.

      Delete
    7. But the fact that he has groupies who have followed him from previous parishes

      Groupies are a real problem, no matter how mediocre or problematic a priest is, he will always have a group of people who delight in him to form a mutual admiration society.

      On the other hand, there is a reluctance of laity who are willing to let their views be known to such pastors, or each other, and especially to take any initiatives on their own. As Greenleaf said, organization really don't encourage leadership and we don't encourage leadership in one another.

      Delete