Summary
The current decline in
new cases at the rate of 2% per day is not the first decline. The January –February decline at the rate of
2.5% ended in stagnation in March. The
July-August decline at the rate of 1.5% ended in the great spike which began in
mid-September. Can these past declines
help us predict what will happen in the rest of this calendar year?
Prevalence refers to proportion of persons who have a
condition at or during a particular time period, whereas incidence refers to
the proportion or rate of persons who develop a condition during a particular
time period. All rates of new cases per day, both projected and actual, are an
average of the last seven days.
The Current USA Pandemic Incidence Decline which began on April 10
On April 10 the national number of new cases per day began
to decline. About two weeks later I decided the rate of two percent per day
best fitted the decline. So in the following chart the projected estimates are
given, along with the actual incidence for that day, and then the difference. Positive
numbers indicate that the incidence exceeded the projection. As can been seen below the actual incidence on
May 15 (average of preceding seven days) was 302 cases below the projected
number. Typically when there is a smooth
decline the smoothed daily variability has been within about five thousand cases on
either side of the projected figure.
APRIL 10 (CURRENT) PANDEMIC DECLINE |
|||
Pandemic Incidence Decline Projection at Rate of 2% per Day |
|||
Date |
Projected |
Actual |
Difference |
April 10 |
73193 |
73193 |
0 |
May 1 |
47887 |
52747 |
+2835 |
May 15 |
36090 |
35788 |
-302 |
June 1 |
25599 |
|
|
June 15 |
19293 |
|
|
July 4 |
13143 |
|
|
July 15 |
10524 |
|
|
August 1 |
7465 |
|
|
August 15 |
5626 |
|
|
September 5 |
3581 |
|
|
September 15 |
3007 |
|
|
October 1 |
2221 |
|
|
October 15 |
1640 |
|
|
November 1 |
1164 |
|
|
November 15 |
877 |
|
|
The projection would bring incidence down to 25599 on June 1, then
13143 on July 4, then 7465 on August 1 and then 3581 on Labor Day, September 5.
Ultimately it predicts below a thousand new cases a day by
Thanksgiving. So unless we are in a hot
spot or a large gathering, we should be reasonably safe on July 4th, mostly safe by Labor Day and
very safe by Thanksgiving.
How likely is this to happen? Well our last major decline which began in
early January stagnated in early March. Our previous major decline which began
on July 25, 2020 reversed on September 11, 2020 into the largest surge of the
pandemic.
The largest and most rapid decline which began on January 9, 2021
On January 9, 2021 the national incident rate per day was
256954 new cases. A decline began which a few weeks later I estimated would be
at the rate of 2.5 percent per day. The projections worked well until after March
6. There were in fact 61833 cases on that day, 409 cases lower than the predicted
62222. By April 1 the incidence was climbing again
with a new case rate of 63914, more than thirty thousand cases above the
projected 32215 cases for that date. Cases continued to climb erratically until April 10 when the next firm decline
started.
JANUARY FEBRUARY PANDEMIC DECLINE |
|||
Pandemic Decline at Rate of 2.5% per
Day |
|||
Date |
Projected |
Actual |
Difference |
January 9 |
256954 |
256964 |
0 |
February 1 |
143480 |
145073 |
+1592 |
February 15 |
100660 |
85593 |
-15067 |
March 1 |
70619 |
66681 |
-3938 |
March 6 |
62222 |
61833 |
-409 |
March 15 |
49543 |
55030 |
+5487 |
April 1 |
32215 |
63914 |
+31698 |
April 10 |
25651 |
73193 |
+47541 |
May 1 |
14696 |
49765 |
+35068 |
May 15 |
10575 |
35788 |
+25213 |
June 1 |
6876 |
|
|
June 15 |
4824 |
|
|
July 4 |
2982 |
|
|
July 15 |
2257 |
|
|
August 1 |
1468 |
|
|
August 15 |
1030 |
|
|
September 5 |
605 |
|
|
Why did the rate level stagnate with a slow erratic climb? Most likely this was due to new faster
spreading variants. When the decline did resume it was at a 2.0% rate rather than the previous 2.5 % rate. However
other factors (vaccination rate, mask wearing, social distancing, indoor vs.
outdoor activity, and size of gatherings) likely played some role.
What would have happened if the 2.5 percent
per day downward trend had continued? Cases would have
been at 25651 instead of 73193 on April 10, then reached 15073
per day on May 1, and 6876 on June 1, and finally 2982 on July 4. In other words the whole downward trend got
moved back by two to three months during the stagnation period.
The Decline that began on July 25, 2020
Back on July 25, 2020 there were 67567 cases per day.
Then a decline started at the rate of 1.5 percent per day that continued until
September 11th when the predicted number of new cases was to be at
32709. It was actually 31799 cases, almost a thousand lower. What happened after that day is that
everything reversed and new cases began to climb rapidly upward.
AUGUST 2020 PANDEMIC DECLINE |
|||
Pandemic Decline at Rate of 1.5% per
Day |
|||
Date |
Projected |
Actual |
Difference |
July 25 |
67567 |
67567 |
0 |
August 15 |
49192 |
52901 |
+3709 |
Sept 1 |
38046 |
41231 |
+3184 |
September 11 |
32709 |
31799 |
-911 |
October 1 |
24177 |
41500 |
+17323 |
October 15 |
19566 |
53066 |
+33500 |
November 2 |
14906 |
87168 |
+72262 |
What would have happened had the downward trend at the rate
of 1.5 percent continued? It would have
reach 24177 by October 1, and then 14906 by election eve. Trump would have been
saying all during October that the virus was going away even without the
vaccine. I think he would have been
re-elected. Shortly afterward all the
announcements of the vaccines would have been made. He would have said, “Look not only is the virus
going away, but we have the vaccines to keep it away.” If the Republicans had won the House and
Senate Trump would be talking about “president for life.”
CONCLUSIONS
It is interesting that a downward trend of 1.5 percent
occurred without a vaccine. The downward trend accelerated to 2.5 percent with
the vaccine, but came back to 2.0 percent with the change in variants. Behavior,
vaccines, and virus variants are each important in controlling the virus.
We should wary of attributing the 2.5 percent decline to the
vaccine alone; up to 1.5 percent of that may have been due to behavior. Similarly the plateau between the 2.5 percent
decline and the 2.0 percent decline may have been because of behavioral changes
as much as new variants.
Our predictions for what is next should include both the
extreme cases of a continued 2.0 percent decline due mostly to continued
vaccine rollout, and another flat plateau due to relaxation of behavioral
control. Mostly likely it will be
something in between. I have calculated three additional scenarios at 1.5
percent, 1.0 percent, and 0.5 percent depending on the relative mix of vaccine
rollout, variants, and behavioral control.
PROJECTIONS
In the chart below there are five projections: The April 10
base at two percent, the May 15 base at 1.5 percent, the May 15 base at one
percent, the May 15 base at 0.5 percent and the May 15 base at zero percent
(i.e. a plateau).
FUTURE PANDEMIC DECLINE PROJECTIONS |
|||||
Pandemic Incidence Decline Projection
at Rate of |
|||||
Date |
April 10 2% |
May 15 1.5% |
May 15 1% |
May 15 0.5% |
May 15 0% |
May 15 |
36090 |
35788 |
35788 |
35788 |
35788 |
June 1 |
25599 |
27679 |
30167 |
32865 |
35788 |
June 15 |
19293 |
22401 |
26208 |
30637 |
35788 |
July 4 |
13143 |
16809 |
21652 |
27854 |
35788 |
July 15 |
10524 |
14235 |
19386 |
26360 |
35788 |
August 1 |
7465 |
11009 |
16341 |
24207 |
35788 |
August 15 |
5626 |
8910 |
14196 |
22566 |
35788 |
September 5 |
3607 |
6891 |
11380 |
20723 |
35788 |
September 15 |
3007 |
5577 |
10396 |
19319 |
35788 |
October 1 |
2221 |
4379 |
8852 |
17830 |
35788 |
October 15 |
1640 |
3544 |
7690 |
16621 |
35788 |
November 1 |
1164 |
2741 |
6482 |
15264 |
35788 |
November 15 |
877 |
2218 |
5631 |
14229 |
35788 |
PREDICTIONS
The extreme projections are unlikely to happen. We will not likely be able to maintain the
present two percent per day decline as restrictions vanish, and it is unlikely
that the virus will be able to maintain its rate of infection as vaccinations
increase even if the rate of vaccination is slow. Since it is unlikely that
behavioral restrictions will be increased, the rate of decline will likely
depend upon the rate of vaccinations. If
we make a strong effort to vaccinate people as soon as possible we will be
closer to the two percent column, but if vaccinations stagnate we will be
closer to the zero percent column. We
should try to be under ten thousand new cases a day before September. We certainly don’t want the rate to be above
ten thousand new cases when we get into the Thanksgiving and Christmas
holidays.
I don't suppose the anti-vaxers can be moved, but I think the ones who are hesitant can be encouraged, bribed, and incentivized.
ReplyDeleteAnd hopefully the rest of the world can also get in a better place with vaccination rates. We should do anything we can as a nation to help that. along
DeWine's giving a million dollars a week for five weeks in a lottery to those who have had at least one shot appears to be working.
ReplyDeleteThere are a couple of other factors that might play into this. One is the season - unsurprisingly, last fall the rate of new infections climbed dramatically, escalating from the Thanksgiving holidays to after the New Year. People were indoors more, and many decided to ignore the advice not to travel and not to gather with friends and family. The virus had spread to parts of America by then also, especially rural America, that had been spared the first round. Since these states were among the mask and lockdown resisters, it may be that the rate of acceleration of new cases there was even faster than in other areas. The late fall and early winter peak is the time period that claimed Tom, and also my sister-in-law's brother. I still am puzzled about Tom, as he was hyperaware of the risks and was taking such care. But I suspect my sister-in-law's brother, a sociable guy, decided that socializing during the holidays would be OK in maskless Arizona. He may have even told himself that his sister and brother-in-law had survived Covid, so if he got sick, he would too. But he didn't.
ReplyDeleteThen there is the herd immunity factor. According to today's numbers, 37% of Americans (adult I assume) have had both doses. An even larger number have had the first, which does offer at least some protection. The decline starting in January was probably due to the expected seasonal factors after the holidays were over. But January also saw the beginning of vaccinations. Add those newly immune numbers of people to those already immune from surviving the virus, and it reinforced the braking of the rate of spread.
Finally, there is the unknown number of covid infections that were never reported. I would not be surprised if the number of known cases (33 million as of today) is only 1/3 or 1/2 of the actual numbers of cases. We never did routine testing, and those with mild symptoms most likely were never motivated to get tested. Nobody knows for sure how long the immunity from being infected lasts, but the info I have is that it is at least six months. So, it could be that another 66 to 75 million Americans have some immunity to the disease in addition to the millions who have been vaccinated. That would reinforce the decline in infections, adding to the slowing of new cases trend caused due to seasonal factors combined with increasing numbers of the vaccinated.
So - perhaps your optimistic scenario will play out. I just hope that we didn't jump the gun on removing the mask mandates and cause a reversal of the very hopeful rate of decline in new cases. I am also guessing that the US will reopen the country to tourism from overseas, especially since the EU is reopening to tourism starting in mid to late June in most EU countries. There will be pressure for the US to reciprocate and allow more international visitors into the country if they are dropping their bans on American visitors.
It's an astute conclusion that vaccines alone can't account for the decline we're experiencing; it's a combination of vaccines and virtuous behavior (social restrictions)
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, the situation now is (1) we've picked the vaccination candidate low-hanging fruit; and (2) we're lifting the social restrictions.
Thanks to this post, I am now a pessimist. We will plateau and get stuck. Possibly very soon.
Jim,
DeleteYou are obviously good at reading charts and numbers.
This is how I used to prepare data for the mental health system. As much as possible I like to let the facts speak for themselves. A mentor told me never to try to sell data. No matter how much people may deny the facts, or question them they will come back to accepting them, and that will be a basis for future action.
I intend to post a revised version of this post plus my recent one Faith and Attitudes to Vaccination and another one coming soon on our Cleveland Commonweal Local Community Blog Site
I intend to send our thirty plus people an e-mail saying that while I expect that we can resume meetings in September (we usually get less than a dozen and we are all likely vaccinated) we need to have parish campaigns this summer to get everyone possible vaccinated. I will be forwarding my posts to pastoral staff that I know, as well as the bishop's office, and I invite them to do likewise.
If you are planning to initiate vaccination campaigns, this article might have useful information for you.
Deletehttps://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/05/18/opinion/covid-19-vaccine-hesitancy.html?referringSource=articleShare
The NYTimes thinks Covid is "on the run" in the US.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/21/briefing/covid-19-us-pandemic-vaccinations.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage