Tuesday, February 16, 2021

Remote Learning Circa 1937


 I just thought this article was interesting. I hadn't been aware that remote learning had been done in the polio outbreak of 1937. Of course the internet hadn't been invented yet; it was done via radio.

From the article:

"...This is not the first time education has been disrupted in the U.S. – nor the first time that educators have harnessed remote learning. In 1937, the Chicago school system used radio to teach children during a polio outbreak, demonstrating how technology can be used in a time of crisis."

"...Responses varied from district to district. During the 1918-19 influenza pandemic, school boards held special meetings to debate the best way to proceed. Chicago, New York and New Haven were among the cities that never closed, using medical inspection and individual quarantine instead, while other schools shuttered for up to 15 weeks."

"...In 1937, a severe polio epidemic hit the U.S. At the time, this contagious virus had no cure, and it crippled or paralyzed some of those it infected. Across the country, playgrounds and pools closed, and children were banned from movie theaters and other public spaces. Chicago had a record 109 cases in August, prompting the Board of Health to postpone the start of school for three weeks."

"...This delay sparked the first large-scale “radio school” experiment through a highly innovative – though largely untested – program. Some 315,000 children in grades 3 through 8 continued their education at home, receiving lessons on the radio.

"By the late 1930s, radio had become a popular source of news and entertainment. Over 80% of U.S. households owned at least one radio, though fewer were found in homes in the southern U.S., in rural areas and among people of color.  In Chicago, teachers collaborated with principals to create on-air lessons for each grade, with oversight from experts in each subject. Seven local radio stations donated air time. September 13 marked the first day of school."

"Local papers printed class schedules each morning. Social studies and science classes were slated for Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays; Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays were devoted to English and math. The on-air school day began with announcements and gym. Classes were short – just 15 minutes – providing simple, broad questions and assigning homework."

"The objective was to be “entertaining yet informative.” Curriculum planners incorporated an engaging commercial broadcasting style into the lessons. Two principals monitored each broadcast, providing feedback to teachers on content, articulation, vocabulary and general performance. When schools reopened, students would submit their work and take tests to show mastery of the material."

"...News stories reporting on this novel radio school approach were mostly positive, but a few articles hinted at the challenges. Some kids were distracted or struggled to follow the lessons. There was no way to ask questions in the moment, and kids needed more parental involvement than usual."

School via radio was apparently a city phenomenon.  My parents never mentioned that their schools had done remote learning during this period.  Maybe the polio outbreak wasn't as widespread in Nebraska.  The 1950s is when I recall worries about it, and it was during that time that the Salk polio vaccine came out.  It required three shots. I believe it is still used for children, since they no longer use the oral Sabin one in the US.

Do any of you recall your parents talking of "radio learning"?

22 comments:

  1. Very interesting! 1937 would have been before my parents' school years (in fact, my mother wasn't born yet), but my dad was infected with polio at that time. My grandmother recalled that he had to walk around with a little cane as a toddler. If he had any long-term effects from polio, I'm not aware of what they would be. He played football all the way through high school, and did his stint in the army, so it didn't seem to affect him physically, at least in a way that would prevent him from those types of activities.

    My grandmother recounted how terrified everyone was of polio. She said one of the theories (or at least bits of folk "wisdom") was that kids got it from sandboxes, so children were forbidden from playing in them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Polio is said to be spread through saliva or fecal contamination. So I suppose sandboxes theoretically could have been a source of spread. Swimming pools were another place that parents were afraid of, though the chlorine would probably have killed the virus.

      I thought it was interesting that the radio classes were short, 15 minutes, and that they tried to make them entertaining. Seems like they knew that kids' attention spans would be short under the circumstances. Maybe radio is still a possibility for remote learning where internet availability is limited.

      Delete
  2. Jim's parents are a lot younger than mine. In 1937, my parents had graduated from college and were married. They didn't have any kids yet then. So, they would not have been impacted.

    But, one of my son's business partners in Australia (he's 35ish) grew up being educated by radio. His parents had a 400,000 acre ranch in the middle of nowhere Australia. All the kids on these huge ranches went to school by radio until about age 12, when they went to a boarding school. There was a district teacher (or probably a few of them) who flew in a Cessna to each ranch on a certain schedule to personally assess the students' progress and set up special help if needed. Otherwise it was just the radio. I think the classes were much longer than 15 minutes and weren't "entertaining".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anne, interesting about radio classes in Australia. Makes me think of "The Thornbirds", that 1980s mini-series that took place in Australia. It was wildly popular and everyone watched it. But looking back there was SO much wrong with the plot line. It wouldn't pass muster nowadays.

      Delete
    2. Anne, that is really interesting. I sort of have an idea of your age; seems your parents had you fairly late in the parenting years? I'm sorry for not remembering: did you have siblings who were considerably older? I was sort of at the other end of that particular spectrum: my parents had five of us in the first 7-8 years of their marriage, and then a couple of others who were more spread out. My youngest sibling was born when I was in high school.

      Did some quick math: 400,000 acres = 625 square miles - if it was a square parcel, each boundary would be 25 miles long. That's pretty amazing. I suppose there were ranches that size when the American West was being settled. Around here, a lot of farms would fit into a section of land that size.

      Delete
    3. Here an average sized one-family cattle ranch would be around 5 sections, which is 640 acres to a section. A section is one square mile. This would be pasture land, irrigated farmland is much different and much more expensive. So the Australian ranch would be 625 sections. I'm just guessing that much of it is quite arid, similar to our southwest, rather than midwestern farm ground, or even our pasture land. Even so that is a LOT of land.

      Delete
    4. Our son's partner is the 5th generation to grow up on that land. It borders his uncle's ranch, which is also 400,000 acres. It was pastureland - for cattle and sheep both. But the drought of 20 or so years has ruined the land. My son and his family have spent Easter there more than once. They would fly 2 hours to Adelaide from Sydney and then drive another 7 hours! The photos he has sent are magnificent - but it is definitely now desert. It looks like red rock country - red dirt, scrub all the way to the mountains in the distance, also part of their ranch. His parents had to throw in the towel. They sold what was left of their herds and have retired to the city. I don't know what is happening to the ranch. Perhaps the uncle is still fighting the battle and will run both ranches. They had started allowing tourists and campers who want to hike - the barracks for their ranch hands (some permanent, some seasonal for shearing season) became simple lodgings for those who didn't want to camp in tents. But with so little rain for so many years, running the big herds is no longer possible in that part of Australia. Not enough food or water. Neither my son's partner nor his brother (and not their wives!) want to take on trying to keep the operation going. Very sad after 5 generations. But, I can understand - not only is it a hard life, it is so remote that I would never want to live that far from other people. All the ranchers fly small planes. It's the only way to get to civilization in a reasonable amount of time.

      My son and his family are moving to Denver in April - it will be wonderful to have them living so close. They have launched their US operation and now will have to see if their technology platform works here too. They opened in the UK about 2 years ago - but the focus is on dairy cattle and sheep there.

      Most of the ranchers they work with in Australia don't have as large of ranches as his partner. But most are bigger than the average US cattle ranch I think. And sheep are not a big industry here, unlike Oz, so the focus will be cattle ranches. They recently attracted a new major investor - a company with HQ in Calgary - which is oil country, but also ranch country in Canada. So the company expansion will include Canada as well. Bill Gates thinks all rich countries should give up beef for vegibeef, and he may be right. But I don't think it's going to happen anytime soon.

      Fortunately my son is a diplomatic type, because in his two years of marketing research trips, he has come to understand that most of his potential clients are Trumpistas. And he can't stand trump! But he will be nice to them. I avoid trump people like the, hmmm, (Covid) plague?

      Delete
    5. Jim, I think I'm somewhere around 15 years older than you are - early 70s. I am the youngest of 5 and my parents were in their late 30s when I was born. My eldest sister is 9 years older than I am.

      Katherine, I remember seeing the Thornbirds. It was was filmed in southern California (except for the Queensland parts, which was filmed in Kauai) but don't remember much about the story line. I recall it was about a priest who fell in love with a woman. Don't remember what happened though to the star-crossed romance.

      We stayed on an island in the Whitsundays - Queensland near the Great Barrier reef when we were there 2 years ago. Unbelievably gorgeous. I felt like I was in the south seas in Fiji or Tahiti or somewhere. Very tropical. Completely different from the desert parts of the country. Just as Kauai is a different world from the plains in Nebraska! But the water was a dozen shades of blue and green, changing with the sun and clouds. Kauai is stunningly beautiful, but the water is dark ocean blue mostly, more than the amazing range of shades of light blues and greens you find in the Whitsunday islands.

      Delete
  3. My daughter is a teacher who has been doing remote learning, last academic year and this year. The Catholic schools around here have been in-classroom for the year, except for two weeks after the Christmas break - they kept the kids home for that period in case any of them were exposed during the Christmas/New Year's holidays. But families were given the option of having their children attend remotely, and the parents of some 2-3 children in her class took that option, so she's teaching both in-person and remote simultaneously. She says it's very difficult to do.

    She says that when she teaches via Zoom, the longest she can hold the kids' attention is 20-30 minutes. After that, they lose focus, start talking to one another over the Zoom session - the discipline sort of breaks down. So she has to be strategic about how long her lessons are, and how many times per day they come together via Zoom.

    I would think that family structure and stability would make a big difference for kids who are learning remotely. My wife stayed home when our children were young, so had we been in this pandemic during those years, we probably would have coped relatively well. We would have been fortunate. A single parent who also needs to work - I don't see how remote learning could work out for those kids unless there is a good support network: grandparents, aunts, uncles, anyone who can help.

    It was nice to read that the radio networks and newspapers saw themselves as part of the support network. Maybe I'm being too cynical, but it seems difficult to believe that media organizations would embrace that sort of civic responsibility today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought that was nice too, that the media were helping make remote learning possible.

      Delete
    2. Jim, What grade does your daughter teach? How many children?

      My 6 year old grandson has been doing virtual school since last March. Fortunately he is in a very small class - 12 children. The teacher is amazing, but she also only has 12 to monitor on Zoom. He generally has a 40 minute class, 20 minute break, 40 minute class - for reading, spelling, and math. Then a 2 hour lunch break before the afternoon session - it varies - social studies, science, art, music and PE, depending on the day of the week.

      We need to go home for a while, but have spent a lot of time supervising him, helping with homework, and taking care of the baby so that my son and his wife can work. It's been exhausting. My husband is 80 now, and we are getting too old for this! But I do most of the childcare and he has been working on fixing up overdue small maintenance jobs in their house. After we take care of things at home we may fly back to California. We get our second doses of vaccine this weekend. I bought a new car, retiring my 17 year old car at home, so we will be driving again. Waiting for the winter storms to be over though!

      It's not good that our grandson has not been with other kids now for almost a year. There is a lot of stress. I'm grateful they live in Calif because the kids can be outside most of the time. I sit outside in the sun and just monitor what they are doing so they don't get hurt!. The baby will be 1 year in a week. But she started walking at 10 months. She toddles around after her brother and the dog quite happily outside. Inside they get more frustrated and cranky and the patience of the parents who are trying to work runs low after a while. I have no clue how a single parent manages this situation. It's truly awful.

      Delete
    3. She teaches 2nd grade, so right around your grandson's age (guessing he is in first grade?). I think she has 17 in her class this year, which is the biggest she's had so far. She picked up a couple of kids who previously had been in public school, because the public schools around here had not been in-person for the first few months of the academic year, and parents couldn't cope with the home learning. And she picked up one or two because a nearby parish's Catholic school closed after last year. (The Chicago Archdiocese is in the midst of a long-term process to close and consolidate schools and parishes. Our parish starts the process next year sometime. No clue whether they'll let us continue on by ourselves or will seek to consolidate us. All the parishes around here are pretty large; ours, with 3,000 registered families, is about average for this area. Merging parishes this size to create "super parishes" would take this diocese into unexplored territory. But of course, "3,000 families" is a pre-COVID metric; who knows what the actual size and base of financial support will be on that magical day, ever receding into the distance, when we get back to normal?)

      Delete
    4. We're also in a precarious position as far as keeping parishes open. I'm pretty sure we can keep the three in our town, but they each have a school, and those may have to consolidate. Each of the parishes will have to take on a "sister parish", rural small-town ones that the archdiocese can't staff. Some of the parishes that have been consolidated maintain their own "campuses" with shared administration.
      Then there is the additional problem of parishes where the people and the priest don't see eye to eye (*ahem* like the ones that have the priest who attended the capitol insurrection, and is trying to refashion the parish in a raddy traddy mode). But the archdiocese can't switch anyone else in because there isn't anyone else, and besides, where do they put the guy who is there now?
      One thing that will probably happen is deacons doing a lot of Word and Communion services.

      Delete
    5. Wow, 3000 families is a lot, especially if they get merged with another large parish. Ours is about 750; the other two in town are larger.

      Delete
    6. Personally, I haven't been through a parish merger (yet), but I can see that it would be particularly demoralizing for the parish staff. A single parish doesn't need two music directors, so one has to go; doesn't need two religious ed teams so those have to be consolidated and trimmed; and so on.

      Professional parish ministry would be a tough field to get into now. I've talked to one or two recent grads from formation programs who are a little demoralized because there are no job openings. The church isn't creating new jobs these days, it's shedding existing jobs.

      Even the priesthood works against new people trying to break into the field: a typical pastor is someone who has been in parish ministry for a couple of decades (or more), and already has a thick network of friends and colleagues from prior parish assignments. If a pastor has an opening, say for a youth minister, and is able to choose between a fresh-out grad without a track record of working in the church, and an old friend whom the pastor already knows, likes and trusts: well, I haven't met a pastor yet who will take the younger, unproven person.

      In my view, this is one of the key reasons that the Catholic church comes across as so suspicious of new ideas. It's run by people whose lengthy careers have been constructed from the same old ideas.

      Delete
    7. If one of my kids had expressed interest in working for the church as a musician or other type of parish ministry, I would have advised him to contribute his talents as a volunteer instead, and get a day job with better pay and benifits.

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jim, yes, he is in first grade. He will be 7 at the end of April. From watching him last fall, early in the school year, when they were at our house, and now, it seems to me that the virtual school experience is now less effective now. It's gotten boring I think, even though the teacher does an amazing job keeping the kids engaged. He blanks out, or wanders away from the computer sometimes. It's gone on so long - almost a whole school year.

    I'm sure it's really tough on your daughter to have to teach in both modes. My grandson's school is private and is open 2 hours each morning for in-person, but few do it, because it's not the full school day. It's not worth the drive (in LA traffic!) to get them there and then turn around to pick them up two hours later. All of the kids in his class are virtual.

    They may be able to open full-time in March. I hope so, because we will be back east by then we assume.

    When they were looking at schools for him, they looked at two Catholic parochial schools(including the one I went to all those many years ago). The class sizes were much larger - about 25/class. I'm surprised at how small your daughter's class is, compared to the Catholic schools around here.

    He is in a Lutheran parochial school, and all of the class sizes are around 12-13. There are two first grades, two all grades actually. It goes through 8th.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anne, right. This particular Catholic school where my daughter works is pretty small - its enrollment barely reaches the archdiocese's minimum enrollment figure. I think it likely that sometime in the next five years, it will have merged with another Catholic school (which is much larger) in that suburb.

      Demographically, the Chicago Archdiocese is not growing. The City of Chicago has a million fewer residents now than it did in 1950. Most of the city's parishes and schools were built for that earlier era's population density. (The same is true of the Chicago Public School system, which also needs to go through consolidation.) The larger metropolitan area continues to grow, but much of that growth is in counties which are in other dioceses.

      I believe the situation in the LA Archdiocese is quite different: still growing by leaps and bounds, and I would guess the average age is younger than the Chicago area - a lot more families with school-age children. That's the picture I have of most of the Southwestern United States.

      Delete
    2. When I was in Catholic elementary school in the 1960s and 70s, in Jean's diocese, my average class size was somewhere in the neighborhood of 30-35 kids. My parents, who attended Catholic schools in the same town (in my dad's case, the very same parish school I attended), tell me that their class size was larger: there could be 40-50 kids in a single class.

      Delete
    3. The 40-something classroom size sounds similar to what it was when I was a kid. The classrooms were two grades, so it was actually 20-something per grade, but the same teacher had both. It was a contrast with my mom's one room country school with 10-12 kids, 6 of whom were Mom and her siblings. It was grades 1-8. I always envied my cousins who went to country school. Seemed like they had a lot more fun than my pretty strict and regimented Catholic school.

      Delete
    4. When I was in parochial school in the 50s, there were 45-50 in every classroom.

      Delete