On Sunday the United States signed the documents of its surrender to he Afghanistan Taliban. The sorta democratic government we sorta whistled up didn’t even have a representative in the building.
We also promised the Taliban that the unrepresented government will release Taliban prisoners it is holding. The government found out what we promised from them from rumors and social media.
The sorta democratic government we whistled up is mildly upset out loud and furious everyplace else. They fear offending the President of the United States, who is verbally scarier than the Taliban. The government depends on U.S. good will. And money.
Throwing allies under the bus is part of the Art of the Deal. As Mick Mulvaney would slay, "Get used to it."
In October, the POTUS abandoned the Kurds — three times our allies and now three times screwed — and dropped the checkered flag for the Turks to have at them.
Nothing good for Afghans can come from our surrender after 18 years of war. The ones who worked for our armed forces and diplomats, as interpreters, drivers and facilitators, expected — because they were told — that they will be protected. But the Art of the Deal does not include taking more suspicious foreigners into the Zone of the Interior. Iraqis who had the same promises also are being stiffed.
So: Broken promises. Untrustworthiness. Cruelty. Large demonstrations of incompetence.
The rest of the world looks on appalled and wonders if the United States of America should be allowed out without a minder.
Now, normally the party out of power in this country would flail a government that failed in its international duties and surrendered to a dusty bunch of thugs. If this had happened during the Obama administration, the Wrath of Fox would roar throughout the land.
That won’t happen this time.
For one thing, if Americans ever find out about the surrender — and how will they with Super Tuesday and Covid 19 dominating the news cycles? -- it will never get as much attention as the true meaning of the cabalisltic word “confeve.” The Democrats are not likely to complain because all that will stick with the voters is that Potus is Bringing the Troops Home.
Polls show he American public will like that. This is a surrender he can run on. And his opponents will continue to stand mute.
If the arc of history still bends toward justice both parties and the nation they pretend to represent will pay for this shameful event some day. Big time.
AGREE.
ReplyDeleteAnd backing both of us, Tom, is a piece from Saturday's NYTimes by a former CIA officer and father of a son now fighting there. CIA, you say! Can you trust him? He points out some obvious, and not so obvious, reasons that this "peace" agreement will not work:
1. The Taliban who signed the treaty don't really control the fighters.
2. The Taliban who are fighting think they're winning.
3. The Taliban are not the only fighters on the street.
4. Zalmay Khalizad, the U.S. negotiator is aiming for Secretary of State in the second Trump administration.
5. The Afghan government did not participate in the talks and did not sign the agreement.
Plus much, much more.
Trump will claim he made peace in Afghanistan and brought the troops home...Does this sound familiar? Vietnam?
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/27/opinion/afghanistan-war-taliban.html
Anybody who considers entering into a deal with this welcher president should talk to Trump's previous unpaid contractors. Of course, it's nothing new for this country. Ask any Native American.
ReplyDeleteI agree that Trump has no appetite for foreign ventures and entanglements. To him, a bad deal is better than no deal because he doesn't give a flying can of Shinola about Afghanistan and quite likely would struggle to find it on a map. Of course, the same can be said about most of the American people, at least until another airplane crashes into a skyscraper.
ReplyDeleteIn this particular case, given the history during our lifetimes, it seems unlikely that Russia would try to fill whatever vacuum would be left by our exit. But there surely will be unintended consequences; will be interesting to see what they are.
I was gob-smacked when I heard about this "deal." We have no power to effect the release of prisoners being held by the Afghan government. What a joke.
ReplyDeleteAlso please stop referring to those who renege on deals as "welchers." Thank you, the PC Police.
Enlighten me about "welchers."
DeleteThe Welsh were maligned as cheats, crooks, necromancers, and thieves from the Venerable Bede forward. Hence "welshing" or "welching" on a bet. It's an ethnic slur. Like "jewing" or "gyping" someone.
DeleteI guess I can now only use the word "reneger". Doesn't have the same oomph, somehow. Does this mean I can't use the word for "whose" when speaking German?
DeleteI never associated the ch welch with the sh Welsh. Whaddayaknow.
DeleteDoesn't surprise me. Damn miners.
DeleteMy mother-in-law 's maiden name was Welch. Don't know if that meant family roots from Wales.
DeleteWalsh, Welsh, and Welch are Anglo-Saxon surnames that indicate someone was of Welsh origin. Ironically, it means "outsider," even though the Anglo-Saxons were the invaders and outsiders.
DeleteYah, miners. Big Welsh mining population in Pennsylvania. Dad's Welsh ancestors were dairy farmers in upstate New York. They all went back to Wales except for their youngest son, my great-great grandfather, a decorated Union Civil War vet.
Raber is 100 percent German, so I gave The Boy a Welsh middle name to trip over (Gryffydd) to remind him of his Celtic roots on my side.
So would that be pronounced Griffith?
DeleteYup!
Delete