I then subtract the previous days number and get the NATIONAL NEW ACTUAL first column of data. When the new numbers were small, less than 200 they had a bar graph that was easily readable so I was able to get all the new cases back to Thursday March 5 while I do not have the NATIONAL TOTAL ACTUAL FOR THOSE DAYS.
I was then able to fit a curve NATIONAL NEW PREDICTED that closely approximated the NATIONAL NEW ACTUAL. The fit is indicated by the DAYS AHEAD/BEHIND COLUMN. Those numbers are zero for almost two weeks.
By Wednesday March 18th the NATIONAL NEW ACTUAL (2436) exceeded the NATIONAL NEW PREDICTED (1758) so that it slightly exceeded the predicted figure for Thursday March 19th (2312) We were ONE day ahead of prediction.
As you can see the situation became worse. For five days we were TWO days ahead of the curve. We want to be BEHIND not AHEAD of the predictions. HOWEVER, things change on March 25th. I am a little suspicious of the data for this day, but it does mark a consistent change in which THE NATIONAL NEW PREDICTED are either on target OR ONE, TWO, and now THREE days BEHIND target.
The same phenomena is also evident in the relationship between the NATIONAL TOTAL ACTUAL and the NATIONAL TOTAL PREDICTED. Since these are smoothed curves the changes are less pronounced.
Now part of the DAYS AHEAD data might reflect the availability of more tests in some parts of the country which were able to detect more cases. However the total picture is consistent with the hypothesis that social distancing may be beginning to show its effects, which should become even more evident in the days ahead.
By the way the orange color in the NATIONAL TOTAL PREDICTED was near to the number of cases in China at the time the curve was fitted.
National
|
Days
|
National
|
National
|
Days
|
National
|
||
New
|
Ahead
|
New
|
Total
|
Ahead
|
Total
|
||
Actual
|
Behind
|
Predicted
|
Actual
|
Behind
|
Predicted
|
||
March
|
|
||||||
TUE
|
3
|
|
|||||
WED
|
4
|
|
350
|
||||
THR
|
5
|
50
|
|
50
|
400
|
||
FRI
|
6
|
80
|
0
|
66
|
466
|
||
SAT
|
7
|
90
|
0
|
86
|
552
|
||
SUN
|
8
|
110
|
0
|
114
|
666
|
||
MON
|
9
|
150
|
0
|
150
|
815
|
||
TUE
|
10
|
200
|
0
|
197
|
1012
|
||
WED
|
11
|
260
|
0
|
259
|
1269
|
0
|
1271
|
THR
|
12
|
400
|
0
|
340
|
1660
|
0
|
1611
|
FRI
|
13
|
440
|
0
|
447
|
2100
|
0
|
2058
|
SAT
|
14
|
659
|
0
|
588
|
2759
|
0
|
2646
|
SUN
|
15
|
843
|
0
|
773
|
3602
|
0
|
3419
|
MON
|
16
|
880
|
0
|
1017
|
4482
|
0
|
4435
|
TUE
|
17
|
1399
|
0
|
1337
|
5881
|
0
|
5772
|
WED
|
18
|
2436
|
1
|
1758
|
8317
|
0
|
7530
|
THR
|
19
|
4075
|
1
|
2312
|
12392
|
1
|
9842
|
FRI
|
20
|
5570
|
2
|
3040
|
17962
|
1
|
12882
|
SAT
|
21
|
6418
|
2
|
3997
|
24380
|
1
|
16879
|
SUN
|
22
|
8638
|
2
|
5257
|
33018
|
1
|
22136
|
MON
|
23
|
10481
|
2
|
6912
|
43499
|
1
|
29048
|
TUE
|
24
|
15353
|
2
|
9090
|
58852
|
1
|
38138
|
WED
|
25
|
9656
|
-1
|
11953
|
68508
|
1
|
50091
|
THR
|
26
|
16873
|
0
|
15718
|
85381
|
1
|
65810
|
FRI
|
27
|
17255
|
0
|
20670
|
102636
|
1
|
86480
|
SAT
|
28
|
20981
|
-1
|
27181
|
123617
|
1
|
113660
|
SUN
|
29
|
18378
|
-2
|
35743
|
141995
|
0
|
149403
|
MON
|
30
|
21580
|
-3
|
47002
|
163575
|
0
|
196405
|
Jack, Thanks for the dedication. You are clearer than the NYT. If it is even keeping a running score (prediction aside), I haven't been able to find it. We keep passing milestones, but you are answering the question, compared to what? Thanks.
ReplyDeleteAs an empirical aside, that NJ hospital that I mentioned has 70 intubated last week now has 170. Not sure if they have run out yet.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, these things work by putting positive pressure on the lungs. That has to be damaging. I would prefer a hyperbaric oxygenation chamber but those are few and far between and not practical for emergency care.
I was thinking Jean said something in a previous thread about iron lungs being able to be used (apparently they still exist). They don't require intubation and maybe would be less traumatic?
DeleteI think the overpressure from ventilators is needed to increase diffusion over what's natural. An iron lung can keep people breathing and they can be on oxygen but they would still be at only atmospheric pressure. I think intubation and a ventilator would work better.
DeleteYes, they are being used in other parts.of the world more commonly for COPD and where polio has made a comeback.
DeleteIt was my understanding that there is some gizmo on the iron lungs that can adjust pressure. But maybe that's just to accommodate the age of the patient?
One of my correspondents in Australia said iron lungs had been kicked around as an alternative to vents, but that there wasn't a stockpile arounds, so better to build new vents than lungs.
Here's an article about building one out of wood from 1952: http://blog.modernmechanix.com/diy-iron-lung/