Sunday, November 10, 2019

Homily 2 - life after death


You might describe the marriage between my wife Therese and me as a love match.  We got married because we dated, and then fell in love, and then decided that we wanted to be married – and then we got married. 

That story obviously is important to Therese and me, but it may not sound that interesting to you, because there is nothing that is particularly unusual about it.  Marrying for love, by mutual consent, is our culture’s ideal – you might call it our culture’s norm.

But that hasn’t been the way that marriage has worked in all places and times. 

I once worked with a woman who is in an arranged marriage.  She is of Indian heritage, although she is not from India herself.  Her parents had immigrated to the UK, and this co-worker grew up in London.  But her family still had strong ties to the old country, and so when she reached the age to marry, her family arranged with another family in India for her to marry a young man from that other family.  I asked her, “Were you allowed to have any say in the matter?”  “Yes,” she replied.  The families set up a time for the couple to meet, and they were given a great deal of time to spend together to determine whether it would work for them.  They both agreed to go forward with the marriage, and as of the last time I spoke with her, she was happily married with several children.

Arranged marriages have been the norm in many times, places and cultures.  If you have ever seen the great musical, “Fiddler on the Roof”, you know that the conflict between arranged marriage and marriage for love is one of the major themes of the play.  Tevye and his wife sing a poignant duet called, “Do You Love Me?”  They are in an arranged marriage, and they come to realize, 25 years after their wedding day, that they have grown to love one another.

There was a financial and transactional aspect about these arranged marriages; and they were of high social importance, because they brought about the alliance between two families.  This was true of marriages among kings and nobles, and it was true of marriages among the poor dairymen, butchers and tailors in the shtetls of Russia and Ukraine.

I mention these items about arranged marriages because such marriages would have been common in biblical times.  It gives us a context for understanding Jesus’s words today, that those deemed worthy to attain to the coming age “neither marry nor are given in marriage”.  That phrase “given in marriage” may allude to arranged marriages, in which a father exchanged his daughter for a dowry from the groom’s family.  In a sense, he sold her to another family, to be wed to one of the sons of the family.  Love may have had very little to do with it.  It’s possible that there were women who heard Jesus speak that day who, upon hearing that life after the resurrection didn’t include arranged marriages, would have sighed with relief.

I offer these reflections on arranged marriages to help cast a bit of light on these strange and powerful words today from Jesus, teaching us about our life which is to come after we rise from the dead. 

We will rise from the dead.  It’s an important article of our faith, but what does it really mean? What is in store for us?  One way to understand what a thing is like is to contrast it with other things that are different.  This morning, I’d like to contrast our belief in the resurrection of the dead with two other, rival sets of belief: the belief that there is nothing after we die; and the belief that we live over and over again via reincarnation. 

Of course, there are many people, perhaps even some people who are here with us today, who think that our existence ends when we die; that there is nothing that comes afterward; that we won’t rise from the dead someday.  That is what the Sadducees from today’s Gospel reading thought.  It’s why they posed to Jesus that seemingly ridiculous question about the wife who marries seven brothers in succession.  Their question was meant to illustrate the alleged absurdity of rising from the dead.  But their question wouldn’t have sounded ridiculous to someone steeped in Torah, the Law; the book of Deuteronomy, one of the books of the Law, mandates that when a husband dies childless, his brother must marry the widow.  There was a certain wisdom and even kindness in that law, which sounds so strange to us today: it provided for the care of the widow, whose prospects may otherwise have been very precarious without a husband to care for her. 

The same law from Deuteronomy also required that any children who came from the union of the widow and her dead husband’s brother would bear the name, not of the new husband, but of his dead brother.  That way, the dead brother’s name would be perpetuated.  To those who don’t believe in the resurrection from the dead, this is the sort of thing that stands in for our longing for eternal life: that one lives on in the name of one’s descendants, or in the memory of those who remember him.    

But we learn from Jesus’s discourse today that this view that everything ends at our death is not correct: when we die, we live on, not in the names of our descendants, but in reality.   For us who are blessed to be chosen by God, life after death isn’t some just some metaphor of memory or descendants’ names; our life after death is real.  Our life continues, through and after a resurrection brought about by the power and love of God, which even death is not able to overcome.

Another common alternative to our belief in the resurrection is a belief in reincarnation: the idea that, after we die, our spiritual essence unites with another body here on earth; when that new body dies, our spiritual essence does the same thing again, and again, and thus there is a continuing cycle of death and rebirth in this life here on earth. 

As it happens, Jesus speaks words today that correct this misconception of reincarnation.  He tells us that we who die and then rise from the dead do not die again.  Once the chains of death have been broken for us, they are broken for good, and will never be imposed upon us again.

So we hold our Christian belief in life after death over against these false ideas: of no life after death, and of reincarnation. But what will our life after the resurrection be like?  It would be wonderful if the bible contained an essay or a textbook on this topic, because I have many questions about this.  Most of all, I’d like to understand, “Will I be able to be with Therese in some way?  Will I be able to be with my children?”  I think there are quite a few people with questions about these sorts of things.  Throughout the New Testament, there are little hints and glimpses offered here and there, including from today’s Gospel passage, but there is quite a bit that we don’t know for certain.  Our fundamental stance must be that we won’t know all there is to know about it until we get there ourselves. 

But … we also might get an idea about our resurrected life just based on what we already know about God. We know that God has been faithful to us, and that he has given us his Son to save us, so we know he loves us very much, and that our destiny is important to him.  Based on that alone, I think we can be confident that what he has in store for us will be wonderful.  I think it will be wonderful beyond our wildest imaginings.

But there is yet another way we can get a glimpse of life beyond death. And that is that God doesn’t just wait for us to arrive there after our deaths.  Like the father in the parable of the Prodigal Son, rushing out to meet his contrite son, God comes to us, here on earth.  And in doing so, he gives us a foretaste of what is in store for us.  He does this by giving us life in him.  He fills us with his Holy Spirit.  Through his son Jesus, he gives us a sacramental life.  It starts with our baptism and confirmation, and it’s sustained by the bread of life.  Even our marriages reflect in some way the love that God has for us.

So we know that what we have here is not all there is.  Really, this life we’re living now is just our preparation for what is to come.  As we receive the Bread of Life ourselves, let us give thanks that God loves us so much that he has prepared a wonderful life for us, even after we die.

32 comments:

  1. Nice homily, Jim.
    I'm really glad we don't believe in reincarnation. That would just seem like the guy pushing the boulder up the mountain, only to have it roll back down. Those who do believe in it say that you don't remember past lives. Which seems to defeat the purpose, if you were meant to learn from past mistakes.
    As for arranged marriages, I suppose they could work if both parties were in agreement.
    I have mentioned before that my former boss was from India. It is said that it's easier to get forgiveness than permission. His family's plan was for him to get his master's degree in the US, then go home for an arranged marriage. That didn't happen. He met someone here, and got a job here. He and his wife were married in a private court house ceremony. He didn't tell his parents until it was a done deal. Of course they weren't well pleased. But they came around when the children were born.
    My husband and I were talking about the Gospel reading. We both hoped we'd be able to hang out together even if we weren't "given in marriage" anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Eternal Life may not mean Eternal Joy, ya know. Some of us will likely end up where Eternal Agony will make us envy poor Sisyphus mentioned above.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sensitive to these fears (indeed I'm afflicted by them from time to time myself). I'd encourage anyone who is beset by such fears to meet with a priest, and/or some wise and holy person like a spiritual director.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, the standard advice. In reality, priests have no time, and spiritual directors cost money and travel time.

      I think you have to follow your own good impulses, unceasingly ask for mercy, and accept that it's in God's hands no matter what you do.

      Delete
    3. Jean, sure. I'd add one more item to your list: if you're not baptized, get baptized.

      Delete
    4. Jim: Jean, sure. I'd add one more item to your list: if you're not baptized, get baptized.

      I hope you're not saying that only baptized christians are eligible for heaven. No salvation outside the church?

      Delete
    5. Anne - no, I am not saying that.

      I'd suggest that there are two erroneous ways of thinking about this:

      * Baptism has nothing whatever to do with our salvation

      * Baptism is the only way to salvation for everyone, which implies that those who never have heard the Good News are damned to Hell for eternity.

      Here is what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says, under a section entitled "THE NECESSITY OF BAPTISM":

      "1257 The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation.60 He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them.61 Baptism is necessary for salvation for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament.62 The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude; this is why she takes care not to neglect the mission she has received from the Lord to see that all who can be baptized are "reborn of water and the Spirit." God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism, but he himself is not bound by his sacraments."

      I'd say that's pretty strongly worded in favor of baptism. But, expanding on the final sentence of that quote, a couple of paragraphs later we read:

      "1260 "Since Christ died for all, and since all men are in fact called to one and the same destiny, which is divine, we must hold that the Holy Spirit offers to all the possibility of being made partakers, in a way known to God, of the Paschal mystery."63 Every man who is ignorant of the Gospel of Christ and of his Church, but seeks the truth and does the will of God in accordance with his understanding of it, can be saved. It may be supposed that such persons would have desired Baptism explicitly if they had known its necessity."

      Because "the Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry to eternal beatitude", I consider "get baptized" to be good advice.

      Delete
    6. I was taught that there is also the "Baptism of desire" which would be the desire to do good and shun evil. Not all Christian churches have Baptism as a formal ritual, including the Salvation Army, whose members surely have the desire to do good.

      Delete
    7. So much of Church teaching boils down to "we don't know for sure, but it couldn't hurt."

      My baptism was important to me, and as more than just fire insurance. Even RCIA remains an meaningful to me for all the bitching I do about.it.

      Delete
    8. Part of Baptism is the spiritual ID card it gives the baptized for the community. As a wise Sister once said, "I don't care if the baby is crying in church. If he is baptized, he has as much right to be there as you do." (I am not as cavalier as she was, but I do remember her words and find them calming when confronted by a screaming fellow child of God.)

      We used to do baptism during Mass. I approve. I'd even suggest the baptismal hymn be, "Hail, Hail, the Gang's All Here," but I wouldn't insist. My point is, whatever spiritual effects the sacrament has, it also means the receiver is the equivalent of a made man.

      Delete
    9. Like Katherine, I too was taught about "baptism of desire".

      "Every man who is ignorant of the Gospel of Christ and of his Church, but seeks the truth and does the will of God in accordance with his understanding of it, can be saved. It may be supposed that such persons would have desired Baptism explicitly if they had known its necessity."

      Fortunately, they were wise enough to include a loophole with vague enough language that one can assume that the God who is Love did not deliberately create billions of human beings who would not be "saved" simply because God chose to have them born into a Hindu family in India. Or to a Buddhist family in Japan, or a Muslim family in Iraq, or to an atheist family in China or Korea. Most of these people, at least in the modern era, would have heard of Jesus Christ, been exposed to christianity, and yet remained Hindu or Buddhist or Muslim or atheist.

      So, while we don't know the fate of Hitler's soul, it seems likely that his baptism as a Roman Catholic might not have been enough to get him into heaven right away.

      And it may be that Gandhi, who was certainly acquainted with Christianity and the gospel, might make it to the head of the line in purgatory faster than Hitler, even though never baptized.

      Apparently Gandhi was attracted by the gospels - but not by those who claimed to follow Christ. He had a most unpleasant experience when trying to attend a mass at a Catholic church in Calcutta (see story link below)

      According to numerous sources, he once said “I’d be a Christian if it were not for the Christians.’”

      Read more here: https://www.kansascity.com/living/religion/article18756585.html#storylink=cpy

      Something to keep in mind when evangelizing.

      A whole lot of baptized christians have turned their backs on formal religion. Trying to attract new members when unable to keep those baptized into the christian faith seems a bit questionable. Maybe figure out why so many have left (by LISTENING to them) and if you fix that, the new members might just show up of their own volition.

      In addition, millions of Christians reject the necessity of baptism by water and don't practice it routinely. They believe that the necessary baptism is the baptism in the Spirit.

      So, if they are only baptized in the Spirit, and not with water, is it all over for them too? Or is that good enough? Like baptism of desire (to do God's will)

      Delete
  3. Very nicely done. We don't hear much about reincarnation from the ambo. And, of course, we have Catholics who know they used to be cup bearer to Charlemagne (but not a rice farmer).

    Our pastor's take on marriage in heaven was that God himself is a family, and when he became man he was born into a family, and when he spoke of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, he was talking about a family line, so there is something about family that is important to him and likely to be reflected in eternal life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tom, I like your pastor's take. And it always has surprised me over the years how many Catholics believe in reincarnation - or, for that matter, astrology. If it's a sin at all, I think it's venial.

      Delete
    2. Tom, yeah I think it's funny that people who believe in reincarnation never think they were some lowly schmo in a previous life. Sometimes I think they don't really believe in it, but feel that their present life is pretty mundane, and imagine some exciting fan fiction for their own story.

      Delete
    3. The way people talk about heaven strikes me as exciting fiction. They're all going to have a big family reunion in some Vegas-like wonderland, and see everyone who did them wrong get theirs in Hell.

      Delete
    4. As far as the people who did me wrong, I'd be happy to beat the crap out of them here on earth and call it even for the afterlife. Otherwise a finite amount of time in Hatlo's Inferno would do.

      Delete
    5. Stanley, I had to look up Hatlo's Inferno. I get the idea it's a little like Hieronymus Bosch's infetno.
      I do remember They'll Do It Every Time and Little Iodine, by Jimmy Hatlo.

      Delete
    6. Yes,Katherine, and I remember the demons having a jolly time dealing out the punishment. Often there'd be a tour bus in the background. A salute to Dante?

      Delete
    7. I found a few Hatlo's Infernos on Google. Some of them still hold up, although they're definitely period pieces. Pretty funny.

      Delete
  4. I have no idea if there is a heaven or hell. I don't know whether there is an afterlife or not - if it’s all over for human beings at death. There is no way to know (there is a difference in believing something to be true and knowing it. Those who believe in heaven have to believe without knowing.)

    Jesus’s prayer includes this “thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven”. Perhaps earth is for human beings and heaven is for the divine and maybe a few angels. I get the feeling that we are supposed to be trying to create the “kingdom” on earth – work towards making earth more like heaven.

    We've got a long way to go.

    For some years I have thought that the concept of reincarnation is not unlike the concept of purgatory. If there is a purgatory, it’s purpose is to purify human beings who have died. Purgatory exists (if it does) to make the dead fully aware of all their many failures and sins and truly repent so that they may be pure enough to spend eternity in God’s presence - whatever that eternity might be and in whatever form we human beings might have taken on in a (very probably) non-material “place” and form.

    I don’t know a lot about reincarnation, but I believe that the cycle of life/death/rebirth of the soul in a new body is meant to be a cycle of purification, of living a more and more virtuous life. If someone messes up, they come back in a lesser state and have to work their way up the ladder again. If they are mostly good then they move up a bit, closer to being released from earthly woes and achieving nirvana.

    Nirvana - ( (in Buddhism) a transcendent state in which there is neither suffering, desire, nor sense of self, and the subject is released from the effects of karma and the cycle of death and rebirth. It represents the final goal of Buddhism. a state of perfect happiness; an ideal or idyllic place
    Similar: paradise, heaven, Eden, the promised land
    Opposite: hell, purgatory


    .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The rustic author of Revelation, who named himself John, promised "a new heaven and a new earth." (21:1) What do you make of that?

      Delete
    2. Tom: The rustic author of Revelation, who named himself John, promised "a new heaven and a new earth." (21:1) What do you make of that?

      Well, since that comment has nothing to do with a comparison of reincarnation and purgatory, I suppose it's a challenge to my not knowing if there is a heaven (or a hell). Not sure why there would be a new heaven anyway - it seems that if there is a heaven, it has an eternal nature, not changing to suit the taste of whatever new entrants it receives in each era of history.

      The quote from Revelation casts no real light on it as the sentence can be interpreted in more than one way - only the author knows for sure what he meant. As far as whether or not he meant it to be taken literally or meant it metaphorically, well, only the author knows the answer to that.

      I have said before in comments that I do not read the bible literally. I see it much as Marcus Borg does

      "I see the Bible as a human response to God, Rather than seeing God as Scripture's ultimate author, I see the Bible as the response of these two ancient communities (the Hebrews and the early Christians) to their experience of God."

      Marcus Borg: Reading the Bible Again for the First Time: Taking the Bible Seriously but not Literally"

      Delete
    3. The Jehovah's Witnesses who show up to try and evangelise us say that heaven is going to be right here after the world as we know it is transformed and glorified. Of course I think they also say that we are asleep in the grave until the Eschaton.

      Delete
  5. I have a fascination with near-death experience literature. I take it with a grain of salt (maybe a boulder of salt). But I think some people have had bona fide experiences that way. Common threads seem to be meeting a being of light, who radiates unconditional love; and a life review which happens quickly. And they speak of no longer being afraid of death afterwards, like the guy in this video.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You might want to read about the types of physiological effects resuscitation after an arrest has on the brain.

      Not to say God can't reveal himself to some privileged individuals at the point of death (thinking Julian of Norwich), but only a very small number of people who "come back" have these experiences.

      Researchers are, quite rightly, loath to study this in a big way because it gets pretty grisly. Asphyxiating animals and reviving them to study brain and other organ function seems like a job for a budding Dr. Mengele.

      Dad's hospice nurses told is not to be upset if he hallucinated. Apparently a lot of dying people see dead relatives and what-not.

      My girlfriend's father kept insisting someone from the Nixon administration was sitting in the empty visitor chair. She finally told him that couldn't be so because Nixon had resigned. Her dad got to celebrate that all over again and died happy.

      Delete
    2. "My girlfriend's father kept insisting someone from the Nixon administration was sitting in the empty visitor chair. She finally told him that couldn't be so because Nixon had resigned. Her dad got to celebrate that all over again and died happy."

      That is very funny!

      Delete
    3. Yeah, I've read about the effects of oxygen deprivation and medications on the brain. Which is why I take these accounts with a grain of salt. But some of them do have the ring of authenticity. And there are the last moments of the saints; you mention Julian of Norwich. Therese of Lisieux saw something at the last. Not to mention Stephen the Martyr in Acts.

      Delete
    4. My grandmother kept introducing my dead grandfather to everyone who came into her room at the last. She seemed quite happy to have him there, which made me hope that at one time they had had fun together, and she remembered him that way and not as the sullen drunk he became.

      If seeing him gave Gramma comfort, then it was a gift wherever it came from.

      Delete
    5. Brother of a friend told me that, at the family get together following his father's funeral, he saw his father sitting in one of the chairs smoking his pipe. He told me he said to himself, "This is not supposed to be". His other brother did not see their father but did smell the pipe smoke.
      A lady friend has a daughter who's a nurse. Several years ago, four of her friends, two couples, were killed in a Route 80 car accident. No seat belts. She was getting ready to go to one of the female friend's wakes. She picked out a blouse and put it on. She had this extreme feeling of discomfort. Could not stand the blouse and switched. No problem with the other blouse. A female friend was with her as she experienced this. Later, as they stood in line to pay respects at the casket, her friend, with a shocked expression, told her to look at the deceased. The dead girl was wearing the same blouse that she could not tolerate earlier.
      Stories. Just stories. Too anecdotal and subjective to be science. But interesting.

      Delete
    6. Only once in my life did I have a "Did I just see who I think I saw?" moment. It was my grandmother who had been dead for 12 years. I and other family members were sitting around my mother's hospital bed shortly after her cancer diagnosis. Nana was sitting in an empty chait. I blinked and she was gone. Did it happen? I'll never know, this side of the grave.

      Delete
    7. Every time I look in a mirror, I see my father ...

      Delete
    8. Jim, LOL! That's like me, I know my house is haunted, because whenever I look in the mirror, this old lady is looking back at me.

      Delete