Sixtus II, Pope and Martyr, whose martyrdom is celebrated on August 7th
A few days ago, Katherine pointed us to a Commonweal article by B.D. McClay which suggested that Maria Goretti's death, originally presented to the faithful as a sort of heroic sacrifice in defense of virginal purity, has the potential to take on new and unexpected meaning in the wake of the scandals of the sexual abuse of children. Could the communion of martyrs do the same regarding the death penalty?
Unless you go to daily mass or pray the Liturgy of the Hours, or happen to have an interest in the topic, the church's veneration of its martyrs can slip under your personal radar. Martyrs pop up on the Roman Calendar throughout the year, but never on Sundays. If you are old enough to remember the days when the Roman Canon was the only Eucharistic Prayer used in the Roman Catholic mass, you know that it contains two canons of martyrs; when I was a kid, the truncated versions of those lists usually were prayed, leaving the martyrs between the brackets remembered only in the print of our missalettes. And now that other, shorter and allegedly more form-correct Eucharistic Prayers are available, the Roman Canon, now known as Eucharist Prayer I, is rarely if ever prayed at Sunday mass, at least in the places where I worship.
But the cycle of martyrs marches on year by year. They watch over us, even when we don't acknowledge them. In some cases, including most of the martyrs in the Roman Canon, not much of their lives is even remembered or known except that they died - or to be more precise, were put to death.
Based on my extremely brief, perfunctory and inexhaustive survey of the list of martyrs, there are two major sets of circumstances in which martyrs have been killed:
- They are killed by mobs: this would apply to St. Stephen, the first martyr (and traditionally remembered as a deacon). As it happens, that mob was lead by Saul, later known as St. Paul, whose remark in Romans 13:4 frequently is cited by Christian death penalty proponents (although, to be fair, that remark is in support of the other main category, death by civil authorities). If we use a definition of martyrdom that is expansive enough to encompass someone like Abraham Lincoln or Martin Luther King, then we might also expand our notion of mob action to include assassinations by a mob of one who took the law into his own hands
- They are killed by civil or religious authorities. This, it seems to me, is by far the more common method of martyrdom. In the New Testament, all of the other deaths I can think of (John the Baptist, Jesus, the two thieves to the left and right of Jesus, the Holy Innocents, James) were ordered by civil or religious authorities. The same is true, we're told, of St. Paul, the other martyrs in the Roman Canon, including today's martyrs - Pope Sixtus and his deacon companions - and other martyrs as various as Thomas More, Paul Miki and Charles Luanga
Martyrs traditionally are remembered for their heroic deaths: for choosing to die rather than renounce their faith. They are exemplars of the Christian view that our faith is the pearl which we should be willing to give up all our possessions - even our lives - to possess.
In light of Francis's recent revision of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, it may also be worth reflecting on the fact that most martyrs also are victims of the death penalty: most of them have been put to death by the decree of a ruler or a government. What's more, it seems to me that it's intrinsic to martyrdom that the martyr's death strike us as undeserving. That notion of undeserving is worthy of further exploration: it points to gaps between our intuitive (dare we say natural-law?) notions of justice and the state's definition of justice. But for now, let's leave it that a martyr's death at the hands of civil authorities is an abuse of power.
The development of Catholic teaching on the death penalty has been along the trajectory of human dignity: John Paul saw state-sanctioned executions as further enabling a culture of death; and now Francis has taught that they are a violation of our human dignity, because all humans, even those who commit heinous crimes, have the gift of life, and that gift from God is good. Thinking about the martyrs, whom we might describe as victims of unjust death penalties, might help us appreciate that all humans have a right both to life and to religious freedom. The latter is ordered to helping us to get to know God, neither constrained nor coerced by human governmental power. Violating either right is a gross violation of human dignity. The martyrs may have important lessons to teach us about our contemporary world.
Here is a very fascinating excerpt from a post on Mirror of Justice which raises profound questions (it seems to me) about the execution of Jesus and its place in Christian theology considered in conjunction with the recent "development of doctrine" regarding capital punishment:
ReplyDeleteI return in closing to the theological issue raised at the start: the failure of the encyclical to achieve a clear focus on the resurrection and its tendency to put the cross in its place, central to the salvation history of life but unrelated to the phenomenology of death. Now I can suggest a reason for this. John Paul’s failure, on the side of civil justice, to identify the link between judgment and mortality is reflected in a failure, on the side of death, to link mortality and judgment. Politically we have justice without death, anthropologically death without judgment….
The symbolic links of judgment and execution stand at the heart of what we understand about Christ’s reconciling death. We may be rid of ordinary uses of the death penalty in most Western states; I am glad to live in one where we are. We may one day be rid of it elsewhere, in Third World countries, Muslim societies, and so on. If we can achieve that responsibly, it will be a fine achievement – though we must be on our guard against irresponsible, crusading attitudes which fail to take the context (legal, economic, social, and moral) seriously. But we cannot be rid of the symbolic role that the death penalty plays in relating death to judgment. There will always be a death penalty in the mind – if, that is, we are all to learn to “die with Christ,” understanding our own deaths as a kind of capital punishment.
Dumbing that way down (and probably misunderstanding it), if execution is always unjust, how do we understand atonement by Jesus dying "for our sins"?
"the failure of the encyclical to achieve a clear focus on the resurrection and its tendency to put the cross in its place, central to the salvation history of life but unrelated to the phenomenology of death."
ReplyDeleteIf that means anything, its meaning eludes me. The article cited focuses on an encyclical of Pope St.John Paul II, and I don't think I was able to finish any of his encyclicals. Lack of transition. So maybe it's just me. I was raised to consider, and still consider, passion-death-resurrection as one continual and complete act. So maybe I am closer to the Eastern lung.
Whew! I was feeling some pressure to try to respond like I knew what that meant!
DeleteI guess what he's saying is, 'Hey, gang, don't dismiss the death penalty as unworthy of civilization: it's intrinsic to our salvation. That doesn't mean that we're called to execute prisoners, but it does mean that, at least one time in human history, it had some redemptive value.' Maybe?
Jim, did you include the "bad" thief along with the "good" thief, a/k/a Dismas, as a martyr killed by civil authorities?
ReplyDeleteTom - good question. I guess, depending on which Gospel you read, they both weren't very nice people, although I suppose some martyrs weren't either. But I wasn't claiming they all were martyrs, simply that the New Testament deaths were all (except for Stephen) instances of the death penalty. To best of my knowledge, the bad thief isn't in the choir of martyrs, or if he is be probably sings no better than I.
DeleteCoincidentally I was reading an article about the Carmelite Martyrs of Compiegne today. They were the 17 Carmelite nuns who were guillotined during the Reign of Terror.
ReplyDelete"In six weeks, 1,306 “enemies of the state” were decapitated there before the Terror ended. A place of understandable horror, it was renamed Place de la Nation in 1880."
Like so many of the trials during the Reign of Terror, the proceedings were unfair and the nuns endured mockery of their vocation before being sentenced to death that very day."
"Their deaths were orderly, calm and holy. Each Carmelite paused before their prioress and asked permission to fulfill her vow.
They sang together, chanting the Salve Regina, the Te Deum and Veni, Sancte Spiritus on their way to the guillotine, and then intoned the psalm Laudate Dominum, omnes gentes (“Praise the Lord, all peoples”); each stroke of the guillotine silenced another voice until at last the prioress walked up the steps to die. The usually cheering mob was unusually silent."
This was a time of capital punishment run amock. It is said that the nuns offered their deaths for the end of the Reign of Terror. They were the subject of a play by George Bernanos, "The Song at the Scaffold", which I have not seen. Also a book by William Bush, "To Quell the Terror", which I have read.
As Jim said, "The martyrs may have important lessons to teach us about our contemporary world."
And Bernanos' play was adapted to an opera by Francis Poulenc, "The Dialogues of the Carmelites". I have yet to hear it but I hope to
ReplyDeleteThere are echoes back and forth between the Carmelite martyrs and the martyrdom of the Tibherine Cistercians in 1996 (subject of the film "Of Men and Gods"; the journal of one of them published by Liturgical Press under the title "Born from the Gaze of God"). Both groups knew what was coming and they neither sought it nor ran from it. Both sets died in failed states where it is unclear whether they were killed by the state or the mob, since state and mob had become pretty much the same thing.
Delete