Tuesday, July 1, 2025

Archbishop Wester: the Big Beautiful Bill a "Moral Failure"

Earlier today, Senate Republicans passed a version of the GOP's massive budget-reconciliation legislation, dubbed The Big Beautiful Bill in homage to President Trump.  

The bill represents Trump's signature legislative achievement for this term in office.  It adds or subtracts funding for many areas of public life: taxation, border policy and immigration, military spending, Medicaid, food assistance, clean energy programs, the debt ceiling, and more.

The House had passed its own version of the bill on May 22nd.  The two chambers will now need to cooperate to come up with a reconciled piece of legislation for President Trump to sign.  It's quite possible that Republicans won't meet the July 4th artificial deadline imposed by their leadership, but in my view it is a virtual certainty that they will meet somewhere in the middle, and President Trump will sign whatever they come up with.

In America Magazine, in an article written before today's passage of the Senate version, and the all-night session that preceded it, Archbishop John Wester of Santa Fe, NM characterizes the legislation as a "moral failure".  The article's headline: "Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill’ betrays the poor. The church must oppose it."

Monday, June 30, 2025

The Senate Parliamentarian

I previously did not know who Elizabeth MacDonough was.  That isn't a name which often pops up in political news. Except that now part of her job is to apply the brakes to parts of the Trump Administration's "Big beautiful bill".

Read on from this article on MSN which explains her duties, and why she is drawing heat from the administration: Why the Senate Parliamentarian is at the center of a fierce debate over Trump’s agenda bill  

Friday, June 27, 2025

Diagnoses: Autism, Aspergers, Spectrum Disorders

The NYTimes has published a guest essay by Allen Francis on the expanding rates of Autism. You can read it on my WEAL website. 


SUMMARY


Third edition of the D.S.M., 1980, autism was tightly defined and considered extremely rare. Criteria for the diagnosis required a very early onset (before age 3) of severe cognitive, interpersonal, emotional and behavioral problems.

Fourth edition of D.S.M included a new diagnosis, Asperger’s disorder, which is much milder in severity than classic autism and much more common. Based on careful studies, our task force predicted that the addition of Asperger’s disorder would modestly increase the rate of children given an autism-related diagnosis. 

Instead, the rate increased more than 16-fold, to one in 150 from an estimated one in 2,500 in the span of a decade and is one in 31 today. 

The enormous unintended consequences of adding the new diagnosis.

!) many instances of overdiagnosis — children labeled with a serious condition for challenges better be viewed as a variation of normal. 

2) Many school systems provide much more intensive services to children with the diagnosis of autism. Whenever having a diagnosis carries a benefit, it will be overused. 

3) Overdiagnosis can happen whenever there’s a blurry line between normal behavior and disorder, or when symptoms overlap with other conditions. Asperger’s was easily confused with other mental disorders or with common social avoidance and eccentricity.

In 2013, the D.S.M.-V, eliminated Asperger’s disorder as a stand-alone diagnosis and folded it into the newly introduced concept of autism spectrum disorder. This change further increased the rate of autism by obscuring the already fuzzy boundary between autism and social awkwardness.

It is difficult to accurately diagnose autism spectrum disorder. There is no biological test; symptoms vary greatly in nature and severity; clinicians don’t always agree; different diagnostic tests may come up with different conclusions; and the diagnosis is not always stable over time.

Social networking has been a powerful force in increasing autism diagnoses. Online communities can promote inaccurate self-diagnosis. As more people with mild symptoms get labeled autistic, it has lost its dire connotations. Some people turn to the diagnosis as a way to feel less shame and guilt around social awkwardness or difficulties in juggling tasks.

The explosion in autism rates has become fodder for Mr. Kennedy’s conspiracy theories. Mr. Kennedy’s statements that people suffering from autism don’t pay taxes, implying they are useless, has created outrage among patients and families. His proposed autism registry is a scary invasion of privacy.

My Comments

The expansion of diagnoses by the American Psychiatric Association has been the bases for much discussion of gender dysphoria in our past posts.  Soon I will be posting an article from Commonweal on the grief as a medical disorder, another case of diagnosis expansion.

In all these cases there seem to be a group of physicians along with a group of consumers who are advocating for expansion, accompanied by our drug industry eager to promote new drugs. Many people may benefit from the expansion of these definitions. But the potential for abuse appears to be there.

Diagnoses have become an important part of how we regulate medical, drug, economic and social benefits.

Diagnoses have become an important part of popular culture by which people interpret their own identities as well as those of others.  












 





Sunday, June 22, 2025

We Love You, God, and We Love Our Great Military

"And I want to just thank everybody. And, in particular, God. I want to just say, we love you, God, and we love our great military. Protect them. God bless the Middle East. God bless Israel and God bless America. Thank you very much. Thank you." 

Thursday, June 19, 2025

Therapy Culture: Blaming One's Parent

The  NYTimes recently had an opinion piece in which the author claims that one of the reasons that young people are not marrying and having children is because they have too high expectations of parenting, that many of them feel their parents have failed them, and therefore they believe they will fail their children. 

I am not interested in the author's thesis, but I am interested in the existence of a therapy culture on the internet which seems to have hooked many young people into blaming everything upon their parents.  I have placed that portion of the article on my website; it has a link to the full article.



1. There is no doubt in my mind that the presence of Alcohol Abuse, Drug Abuse, Physical Abuse and Sexual Abuse in a person's history causes very high mental health costs. I did a study in our system in which I compared persons for each major diagnosis (depression, schizophrenia, etc.) comparing the cost of people within each diagnosis who did or did not have these various problems. Taking the conservative assumption that people who had these problems would have had depression, etc. without these problems, the problems were responsible for much of the costs of our system.  Therefore, figuring out how to deal with these problems is just as important as dealing with depression, schizophrenia, etc.

2. There is no doubt in my mind that parents in many cases are the abusers, and that children of abusers become abusers themselves.  But children do have exposure to persons other than their parents, who are often abusers. So, we can't blame it all on the parents.

3. There is no doubt in my mind that parents often set unrealistically high goals for themselves and their children. One of my psychology professors in graduate school said he was a convinced behaviorist until he had children. One of them was simply a bundle of energy from day one; the other was calm and placid from day one. He said a managed to calm the first down a little and liven the second up a little bit over the years.  In other words parenting 101 should say don't think that your children will be like you because they have your genes or because you raised them. Rather start with the assumption that a random number has assigned you a child, and deal with it in the same way as if a random number had assigned you a coworker. 

4. My discipline of social psychology says that the social environment determines our behavior far more that any internal traits, values, etc.  Therefore when you want to change the behavior of anyone (child, spouse, coworker) think about how you might change their environment rather than their personalities.  I have found it surprising easy to change environments, even large organizational environments, in comparison to trying to change personal behaviors, beliefs, values, etc.

5. Finally, to what extent do you think internet subculture environments such as therapy cultures exist and have a large influence over internet users.   







Sunday, June 15, 2025

The Holy Trinity and families

This is my homily for Sunday, June 15, 2025, the Solemnity of the Most Holy Trinity, Cycle C (and also Father's Day).  The readings for this Sunday are here.

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

Immigration law enforcement protests in Los Angeles

Los Angeles experienced a long weekend of spirited, raucous and occasionally violent protests against the Trump adminstration's aggressive enforcement of its policies against illegal immigrants.   Our Catholic leaders have an opportunity, and perhaps a moral obligation, to weigh in on the still-developing events.