Tuesday, June 6, 2017

Nevada's Bold Healthcare Proposal

Did you see this news story? https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/6/15731622/nevada-medicaid-for-all
"Nevada, with little fanfare or notice, is inching toward a massive health insurance expansion — one that would give the state’s 2.8 million residents access to a public health insurance option.
The Nevada legislature passed a bill Friday that would allow anyone to buy into Medicaid, the public program that covers low-income Americans. It would be the first state to open the government-run program to all residents, regardless of their income or health status."
It's not a done deal yet:
"The bill is currently sitting with Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval, a Republican. His office did not respond to an inquiry about whether he would sign the bill or veto it."
And some providers don't accept Medicaid:
"In Nevada, Medicaid pays 81 percent of Medicare rates. This has the advantage of keeping Medicaid a relatively low-cost program per person — but also the disadvantage of some doctors deciding not to accept Medicaid’s lower rates."
It is likely that this plan would compete in the marketplace with private insurance, which is sure to raise some hackles in that industry.  However, with insurers bailing out in droves, they can't complain too much, and it does open up some options for people.
Since states vary a lot in their Medicaid plans, it isn't a template for national coverage.  But opens the window for individual states to try it:
"As to whether other states might follow the Nevada example, that largely depends on what outcomes it has. If it increases coverage significantly at little cost to the government, state legislators elsewhere would likely take notice. But if it ends up covering few people or increasing government costs, Nevada could become a cautionary tale."

Qatar? Where's That? UPDATE

Big news yesterday: Five Sunni Arab nations (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, Yemen, and the United Arab Emirates) cut their ties with Qatar, a Sunni Arab nation. Is it a big deal? It was a little hard to tell yesterday. The main element in several stories was that the United States has a major military base there and that the embargo and broken relations with Qatar could affect U.S. operations elsewhere in the ME and Africa.

Today Fred Kaplan at Slate reviewed the issues among the 5+1, and also reported what was missing from yesterday's stories (or at least I missed it). Trump was the cause: "tensions between Qatar and the other Arab countries have been simmering for nearly a decade, Trump—perhaps accidentally—triggered this new escalation."

How? "Trump thought he would unify and strengthen the Sunni leaders when he spoke to them in Saudi Arabia last month..... What Trump clearly did not foresee was that his speech would also deepen a wedge among the Sunnis—and, possibly, intensify the conflicts in the region."

Obama kept lines open to all six nations, declining to make the U.S. a party to their many  quarrels. Now Trump stepped in and made the U.S. a party. Why? Was it accidental? If not, who pointed Trump in a direction that is likely to create more Middle East Muddle?

UPDATE: A terrorist attack in Tehran has been claimed by ISIS...the WashPost links it to

More on Just War

Katherine's post brought up the subject and I see that Peter Steinfels has a post about it at Commonweak - The War against Just War.

I didn't grow up, like Peter Steinfels, considering Just War theory, but when I was in high school most of my friends and I were against the war in Vietnam. In college my boyfriend was a conscientious objector. Our ideas were informed by guys like John Kerry (Vietnam Veterans Against the War) ...

And guys like Daniel Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers) ...

When I became a Catholic and learned about Just War theory, I thought it was another disingenuous way for the church to get around being true to what's in the gospels. I still think that.

It's not that I think there are no good reasons to fight but I'm still pretty much a pacifist because war seems like one of the most dehumanizing events in which people can participate, even when fought for the right reasons. I've watched a lot of movies about war, looking for insight, but though almost all of the wars in the films were fought for good reasons, they were all horrific in their way. Here are some I've seen and think are worth a watch ...

- The Killing Fields ..... Alexander Nevsky ..... The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc ..... A Bridge Too Far ..... Das Boot ..... Casualties of War ..... Lawrence of Arabia ..... Enemy at the Gates ..... Black Hawk Down ..... Helen of Troy ..... The Last of the Mohicans

Saturday, June 3, 2017

Unagidon is Back!!

Up at Commonweal:

"A great president once said, “Nobody knew that health care could be so complicated.” Put aside the fact that absolutely everyone knew except him, the statement is pretty good if you change it to: “nobody knew how health care is so complicated.”

Brexit redivivus?

June 8: Britain will got to the polls on Thursday. Prime Minister Theresa May called the election to beef up her Conservative Party members in Parliament (something she said she would not do). It looked like a move that would increase her support in the coming Brexit negotiations (although she was not a keen supporter of Brexit in last year's referendum). How are things going for her?

One consequence of her  turnabouts is the popularity of a song, "Liar, Liar." Another is what looks like a narrowing of poll numbers; the race has tightened. Finally, Labor Party leader Jeremy Corbyn has proven to be a better campaigner than expected.

Anne Applebaum is covering the election in her Wash Post columns. As the election approaches, here is her assessment of the tightening race: "In the end, it may also be that the European referendum last June destabilized the British political scene even more than we thought possible. Suddenly a huge host of questions has been opened up, from the future of Northern Ireland to the future of London’s financial services industry. For nearly a year, nobody in public life has really attempted to answer any of them" (including the Prime Minister).

Will a Conservative Party failure open the Brexit decision to another referendum?

Friday, June 2, 2017

Response to a survey


In which pro-life is pro-Trump. Or vice versa

   Fr. Frank Pavone of Priests for Life, a Catholic anti-abortion organization, sent one of his exhortations asking me to fill out a survey saying how much I like our president's appointment of Justice Gorsuch and how much I hate Planned Parenthood and, BTW how much money I am sending. I can't imagine that any regulars on this blog have never seen one of these "surveys." What set me off is: "The election of President Donald J. Trump provides pro-life movement an historic once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to enact a strong pro-life legislation that will save the lives of millions of  babies."


What he is getting at is defunding Planned Parenthood. And me sending him money. No way. Thus is what I wrote in reply:

Dear Father Pavone,



As a Catholic, active opponent of abortion and the husband of a sidewalk counselor, I can no longer abide your continued enabling of President Trump as a “historic, once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.” Presidents Reagan and W. Bush were called that, too, and where are we? Please stop the “surveys” extolling this one. Since his election (and before), Donald J. Trump has been a consistent affront to what St. Pope John Paul II called solidarity and Pope Francis calls human dignity. Only two of the latest offenses:
more after the break


Thursday, June 1, 2017

The Human Costs of War


The past hundred years have been the most war-ravaged and war-scarred in human history. The human toll has been unbelievable. Not only the millions killed in direct combat, but those killed by resultant disease and starvation. Millions of people in the middle east and other places have been forced to flee their homes and seek refuge in places which are often unwilling to help them.
Four countries in Africa are facing famine:
From the article:  "A potentially historic famine is also threatening Nigeria, Somalia, and Yemen. Far from Western eyes and far from the headlines, an estimated 20 million people in those four countries are at risk of dying due to a lack of food."  
"....these famines weren’t caused by natural disasters like crop failures or droughts. They were man-made — the direct result of the bloody wars and insurgencies raging in all four countries.
The upshot is that the current famines, unlike others in recent history, could have potentially been prevented."
"....But it’s Yemen, where 7 million people are facing starvation, that’s perhaps the clearest illustration of how war is directly causing famine... Yemen has suffered from food shortages for years, but a war between the Saudi-backed government in exile and the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels who control much of the north of the country has brought food shipments into Yemen to a grinding halt.
With US assistance, Saudi warplanes have destroyed bridges, roads, factories, farms, food trucks, animals, water infrastructure, and agricultural banks across the north, while imposing a blockade on the territory. For a country heavily dependent on foreign food aid, that means starving the people."

More after the break...